Preview

Dresden Bombing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dresden Bombing
Between February 13th and February 15th 1945, combined American and British forces bombed Dresden, the capital of the German state of Saxony. Dresden was reported as an industrial target because it was a major rail transportation center. However, during the bombing raid over thirty five thousand civilians were killed.(1) Due to this devastation, many people believe that the bombing was unnecessary and unethical and should not have been carried out even though it further weakened Germany’s war efforts in World War II.

To begin with, many people argue that the bombing of Dresden was not only unethical because of the large number of casualties, but also unjustified due to the military’s failure to target many of the important railways and bridges in the city.(2) Also, according to historian Sonke Neitzle, even though Dresden was an industrial target, the bombing had no significant role in ending the war because by 1945 the Allies had already gained enough momentum to end the war.(3)

Another issue many people have with the dresden bombing was the type of bomb used. The Allies used incendiary bombs, which created huge fires.(1) In all, over three waves of attacks, 3,300 tons of bombs were dropped on the city. This created so much fire that a firestorm developed. The more the city burned, the more oxygen was sucked in – and the greater the firestorm became. It is thought that the temperature peaked at 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit.(1) The surface of roads melted and fleeing people found that their feet were burned as they ran.

However, after the war had ended, the Marshall Inquiry was conducted at the request of General George C. Marshall to examine the need of the bombing raid. The inquiry ended up stating that the bombing of Dresden was necessary because the city of Dresden was seen as a possible place the Germans could use to reinforce their troops on the Eastern Front or to retreat and use Dresden as a base of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the significance of the Reichstag Fire was an important event in German history. Hitler effectively used this event to his advantage, and persuaded the Reichstag and the German public that he was the solution to the current problems of the government at the time. Hitler’s cleverly strategic plan catapulted his profile into popularity and won favours with his voters to execute his…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The presence of rail yards and important hubs made an ideal target for the Allies to attack the city. The strategic and industrial base for Germany needed to be destroyed to shorten the war. The comparison with other bombings and the sense for revenge gives a compelling…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Bombing of Dresden is a major point in European history. It has devastated innocent lives and had the president in a paranormal of mind.(“One day in History.”) This was a foolish act from the united states and the British government. I believe from my research that it was a war crime, senseless with no intended…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    WWII is still the most horrific war in the history of human existence. With over 50 million dead in just 6 short years, every single chapter of the war has been eternally marked in world history. Two particular incidents that will last over the years would be the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Now being considered in hindsight, the nuclear attacks have become very controversial topics. In my personal opinion, I believe that the bombings were absolutely atrocious, but I also think that the bombings were needed for WWII to truly end.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blanket Bombing Myth

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The RAF Commander who ordered controversial firebombing of Dresden which killed an estimated 25,000 civilians during World War II said he would do it again if he had to. The attack was widely criticized because of “Blanket bombing” which hit civilian areas as well as military targets, killing thousands of innocents. In his interview he countered the myth that area bombing was his idea claiming it would steady a Government policy. It was initially claimed that up to 250,000 civilians lost their lives in Dresden bombings but an official report released after the war showed the casualty figure was in fact closer to 25,000. These quickly became hopelessly overcrowded with people who could no longer find shelter in their own burning buildings as…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicts between certain groups of people and nations have threatened the peace of numerous countries, regions, and people. The bombing of Nagasaki, and Hiroshima are one of those events. The decision for the dropping of the bomb was the resolution to one of the many conflicts in history.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the seven long decades since the decision was made to bomb Hiroshima, much has been written both defending and attacking it. With all the information given, this paper should present an argument that the atomic bombings of Japan were wrong. The “wrongness” of the bombing of Hiroshima can be approached from a few different ways. One reason why I am against it is because I feel there were other things that could have been done that were less intrusive than an atomic bomb. Secondly, I argue that it was pragmatically wrong because the Japanese were about to surrender, anyway. Finally, the suffering on the human level was shockingly dreadful. I can’t imagine the pain that was endured during that time. Even…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..." Admiral William D. Leahy (Alperovitz,The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, date of publication unknown) There have been many issues involved with the use of the atomic bomb because of the high cost of lives, and that it was considered to be immoral and unethical. However it has also been considered necessary for the war to have ended, avoiding further casualties on both sides.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people say that the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was unjustified because the U.S. targeted…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 6th of August 1945 was a day that people will always remember with terror. On this day, an atomic bomb was used by the U.S. against Japan, in the city of Hiroshima. This was the first time in world history. Before this sad event, Japan and the U.S. were having conflicts with each other because Japan tried to invade parts of Europe and the Pacific. In an attempt stop Japanese aggressions, the U.S. decided to stop the sale of war materials, such as iron and oil, to Japan. This angered the Japanese, and after peacetalks failed, the Japanese made a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. After this attack, the U.S. declared war on Japan. The two nations fought until after both Atom bombs were dropped (Ellis, 381-382). Through the orders of U.S. President Harry Truman, 13 sq. km were deserted, 70, 000 of 76, 000 buildings were destroyed, more than 70, 000 people were instantly killed, 122, 000 died later, due to the effects of the bombings, and 246, 000 more were severely injured (Söhr, 2). In this essay I want to explain why I would not have bombed Hiroshima like Harry Truman did, although there might have been several reasons to justify his decision.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some people believe the bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary. They claim that Japan was on the edge of surrendering, therefore the United States had no right to bomb the Japanese. Many feel that the bombing was unjust due to the amount of civilians that were either killed or injured. One year after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the death toll stood at 70,000 from those that died instantly and as a result of the radiation (Takaki 47). Also, 30,524 people were considered severely injured and 48,606 people were considered slightly injured…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forgotten War Crimes

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    biased by those who write it, and should not be taken as the whole truth; after…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may feel that the United States was justified in using atomic bombs against Japan. The US was obligated to use the atomic bomb, because, after the Potsdam Conference in July, US asked the Japanese to surrender in early August. Japanese said “no” and that they would never surrender. This left Truman with two very difficult decisions; one: keep fighting or two: use the atomic bomb to end the war. Truman chose the usage of atomic bomb on Japan to end the war quickly, by doing this, he saved tenth of thousands of American soldiers lives. According the Truman’s Decision to Drop the Bomb; four cities were recommended as targets: Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, because of fewer populations. The atomic barely got the Japanese to surrender. Us dropped two, then only with the intervention of the Emperor and even then, there was an attempted coup to prevent surrender. If US have hadn’t used the bomb, the war could have lasted for decades.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays