Preview

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Analysis
I. THE POLITICS OF EQUALITY A. Guarantees of Civil Rights (Table 15-1, pg. 542)
III. SLAVERY, SEGREGATION AND THE CONSTITUTION A. Slavery and the Constitution 1. Compromises in Article I (3/5, slave trade) 2. Article IV - Guaranteed return of escaped slaves to their owners 3. Slaves referred to as "person held to Service or Labour" in the Constitution 4. Dred Scott vs. Sandford (1857) - See pg. 543 Peter Blow -Dr. Emerson dies while they are in free state - Mrs. Emerson now owns Scott - Mrs.Emerson gets married and gives Scott to Mr. Sandford(brother)-since he was in another state they could take it to federal court-Chief Justice Taney ruled that he was not free-filed using
…show more content…
Title VII B. Civil Rights Act of 1968 ("Fair Housing Law") - Prohibited discrimination in the sale or rental of a dwelling to any person on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin
V. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE COURTS - Any program, whether enacted by a government or by a private organization, whose goal is to overcome the results of past unequal treatment of minorities and/or women by giving members of these groups preferential treatment in admissions, hiring, promotions or other aspects of life A. University of California Regents vs. Bakke (1978) wanted to go to grad school at uc davis-cali regents didn't have minorities and made a goal to have more diverse student body-uc davis set aside 15/100 for minorities-Alen Bakke files suit uses 14th amendment EP clause-Supreme court ruled in favor of Bakke-said you can't have quota for minorities-can consider race for one part of admission but not the only reason B. United Steelworkers of America vs. Weber (1979) Weber worked for kaiser aluminum who was under united steelworkers of merica-set up special training program for minorities-weber wanted to get in but couldn't filed using 1964 Civil Rights Act title 7-ruled in favor of court because making up for past

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mr. President, and Gentlemen of the Convention. If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could then better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifth year since a policy was initiated, with the avowed object, and confident promise, of putting an end to slavery agitation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only, not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this Government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new -- North as well as South. Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination-piece of machinery, so as to speak-compounded of the Nebraska doctrine and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the ma- chinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted, but also let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidence of design and concert of action among its chief architects, from the beginning. The new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State constitutions, and from most of the national territory by congressional prohibition. Four days later commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that congressional prohibition. This opened all the national territory to slavery, and was the first…

    • 3215 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present case, the question is whether Joe Smith parent can file a lawsuit because he was discriminated against due to his race, sex, national origin, religion, and/or financial means. Like in the Yick Wo case, Smith is discriminated due to his national origin. Even though, his origin is white and the admissions policy might appear neutral to some, but it is applied unequally to whites. In DeFunis v Odegaard, this case was ruled moot because Defunis was in his last year of law school, so the courts would have to wait for a later case to set a precedent. In Bakke v. UC Board of Regents, the court would decide that at place of higher education can use race in their admission policy, but it cannot be the lone deciding factor. When the university…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott was born a slave approximately around 1795 in Virgina and was owned by the Blow family. The Blow’s are a family of farmers that moved to Missouri from Virginia. This is where Scott was sold to a Dr. John Emerson which was the United States Army Surgeon. Shortly after being sold to the Emerson family, is when all these lawsuit conflicts arose. However, Dred Scott was able to marry Harriet Robinson and have his first daughter with her, Eliza Scott, in 1838 in a free territory. Once Dr. Emerson passed away, the Scott family was under Eliza Emerson’s—wife of John Emerson— ownership. The case that was later entitled Scott V. Sanford first went to trial in 1847. The Dred Scott Case was one of the most important events that happened in history…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9. Which Supreme Court decision ruled that a state law school have to admit qualified African American applicants even if parallel black law schools existed? Sweat vs. Painter…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court Decision ruled on a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with a vote of 8 to 1 ruling bona fide occupational…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education is an example of one Supreme Court case overruling a prior Supreme Court case to promote justice.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott V Sanford

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dread Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. After returning to Missouri, Scott sued unsuccessfully in the Missouri courts for his freedom, claiming that his residence in free territory made him a free man. Scott then brought a new suit in federal court. Scott's master maintained that no pure-blooded Negro of African descent and the descendant of slaves could be a citizen in the sense of Article III of the Constitution.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tkam Essay

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    civil rights cases from state courts with segregationist judges and all-white juries to federal court.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time Line 2

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) The evolution of the institution of slavery from the Colonial Period to the 1860s.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    V. What legal precedent did this case set? What was the significance of this decision for the U.S. at the time of the decision?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative action programs have made differences and communities have benefited in a myriad of ways. These programs are governed by a number of overlapping laws, but opponents have claim Affirmative Action produces reverse discrimination against Caucasians. In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Affirmative Action has occurred in several cases throughout the Americans history and the case that I will be referring to is Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. This case presents a challenge to the special admissions program of the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, which is designed to assure the admission of a specified number of students from certain minority groups (253). In 1973 and 1974, Allan Bakke, a white male, who applied twice to the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, was rejected even though his grade point average and MCAT scores were higher than most of the applicants. With the fact that applicants that were admitted with the special admissions program had lower scores, Bakke alleged that the Medical School's special admissions program operated to exclude him from the school on the basis of his race (258). This, he stated, violates his rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause states that "No State shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    African American History

    • 3538 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Goodman, D. (2010). The fourteenth amendment 's effect on article IV, section 2, clause 1 of the…

    • 3538 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays