Preview

Double Helix

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Double Helix
Double Helix Report #3

Processes and Methods:

One of the processes and methods I found was when Watson said Franklins X-ray patterns are getting better and better. Watson described them as getting more beautiful. You could see it as someone cooking, they start to get better at it after practice. Another analogy could be playing the piano, in the beginning you are not very good and you do not know much, but later on after you practice you start to get better. As the X-ray patterns kept improving, it helped Watson and Crick create the first DNA model. It helped them because the details of the X-ray got better so Watson and Crick was able to examine the hard to see stuff with ease. Also through the X-ray patterns it showed that the structure of DNA was helical. Watson was the one to see it was helical. This showed the cooperation of scientists.

The other method I found was when Watson and Crick immediately knew that Paulings model was wrong and they did not tell Pauling. The problem Pauling had was that it was simply impossible because the hydrogen bonds that formed would have to attach to a phosphate group and they can not do that because the hydrogen atoms should have dissociated. In my opinion I thought it was really smart of Watson and Crick to not tell Pauling because that gave them much more time to make the first DNA model. When they found it was wrong, they knew they were right back in this race. This showed the competitive sides of the scientists. The fact that Watson and Crick did not tell Pauling just to discover it first is kind of selfish, but it was sort of a competition.

Character Sketch:

James Watson was a biologists. He is mostly known for discovering the structure of DNA with Francis Crick. Watson was awarded a Nobel prize in psychology. Watson occupation was at the University of Cambridge. There he met his friend and future collaborator Francis Crick. Watson was working at Harvard University from 1956 to 1976. In 1968 Watson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. What role did James Watson & Francis Crick play in our understanding of DNA’s structure? They discovered the 3D structure.…

    • 2542 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rosalind Franklin was a chemist who made the first DNA structure in 1953. A DNA model is a model of someone's DNA. DNA stands for Deoxyribonucleic Acid.A DNA strand is used to figure out a person’s physical and mental information. There are two forms of DNA an “A” form and a “B” form. (Franklin 2015) Franklin found this out by putting a DNA fiber under a x-ray machine Franklin refined herself. Franklin and Maurice Wilkins used Franklin’s x-ray photo called photograph 51 and Wilkins published first and so he got a nobel peace prize in 1962. (Franklin 2015) Franklin was then given some of the credit and was written about in the article of the newspaper.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a wet one Pauling wanted gis model to be the first accurate model of DNA so he printed it quickly. Another scientist named Rosalind Franklin looked at a wet sample of DNA and realized it had two strands. Watson and crick Two students from Cambridge University looked at Pauling's paper and recognized it. They had made a similar model with a triple helix and knew Pauling was wrong,Watson and Crick looked over Franklin's work and made a new model with a double helix.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5 Dna Worksheet

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * There has been a major effort in the history of science to figure out the structure of DNA. Having a double standard helix DNA has a uniform a diameter in its entire length. The helixes fit within a defined three dimensional space because they are both right handed. Polynucleotide chains are held together by the bases in the (center) hydrogen bonding with the bases on the opposite polynucleotide. Two polynucleotides are form around the outside of the helix with the bases extending into the center. Known as complementary base pairing; hydrogen bonding is a very specific process. Scientist had identified all the atoms and knew how they were bound together. What was not understood was the capacity to store genetic information, copy it and pass it from generation to generation, and the specific three dimensional arrangements of atoms that gave DNA its unique proprieties.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rudolph Virchow was very talented. He was a scientist and a teacher as well as an editor/writer, politician, and anthropologist. Virchow made several important scientific discoveries. One that he is most famous for, is that cells come from other cells. He also discovered that diseases come from malfunctioning cells.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick introduced an elegant double-helical model for the structure of DNA.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pauling had stumbled when he was perceiving DNA to have three interwoven strands instead of two. I find it very interesting that if Watson and Crick had not also been working to discover the structure and Pauling had not caught that he made an error, then people might have thought that he was correct and we might have been learning in class about a whole different type of DNA. The structure would not be known as a double-helix because everyone would have thought it had three strands, and base pairing between nitrogen bases would look much different and I imagine probably more complex, as would the process of protein synthesis and DNA replication. In translation during protein synthesis, it would be much more complex to code for amino acids because more than one anticodon and tRNA molecule would be needed. Base pairing rules would be much more complex because there would need to be combinations of three complementary nitrogen bases instead of combinations of…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Franklin, s. (2003, April 24). BBC News. Retrieved from My aunt, the DNA pioneer: http://www.physics.org/explorelink.asp?id=3131&q=DNA&currentpage=1&age=0&knowledge=0&item=3…

    • 3692 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * O.T. Avery – important because their research on DNA/protein after Griffiths experiment on the transforming factor, was decisive enough for Watson to believe that DNA was the genetic material (not protein as was believed)…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dna Synthesis

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1) Watson and Crick elucidated the structure of DNA in 1953. Their research built on and helped explain the findings of other scientists, including ________.…

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He did not stumble upon his discoveries as some might have, instead he worked meticulously for decades on end to make his great discoveries. Pauling was a genius, he even stumped Albert Einstein in an interview. Einstein said, “‘I am a bit rusty on all this… I’ll have to brush up a bit’” (“A Thirty-Year-Old Prize Winner”). This proves that Pauling’s theories and ideas are complicated but they are also the foundations of chemistry and continue to influence humanity to this day. Therefore, Pauling's discoveries could not have been “oversimplified” because they are major keys to chemistry and without them it would be impossible to unlock the secrets that the future of science holds. Pauling’s work is used in chemistry classes all over the world, and his research on the chemical bond will further help us to understand the molecular…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because Watson and Crick were the ones who lead the research to answer the DNA problem, they were awarded credit for the discovery even though there were many other scientists who contributed their skills and findings to the discovery. After Maurice and Rosalind Franklin, another scientist at Maurice's lab, read the paper that was to be sent to Nature, they objected that a scientist in their lab, referred to as Fraser, needed to be referenced because he "had considered hydrogen-bonded bases prior to [their] work." (128) Even if a scientist did not get equal credit for a discovery, they were given credit as far as the information that they contributed goes. A big exception in the case of giving out due recognition in the history of The Double Helix is that Rosalind's contribution to the discovery was not acknowledged nearly as much as it should have been, most likely because of the fact that she was a woman and science was a boy's club at the…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He was a very successful chemist and Physician. He is remembered as one of the fathers of modern physical science.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide on Genes

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    • James Watson and Francis Crick were the first to solve the structure (structure=function) of DNA.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I was about thirteen years old, I learned about the scientific method. I was taught that in order to prove something you must experiment and one simple, organized way to do it, was using the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics