Donovan v. Dial America Marketing, Inc.

Topics: Supreme Court of the United States, Employment, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Pages: 5 (1478 words) Published: October 30, 2014
Donovan v. Dial America Marketing, Inc.
757 F.2d 1376 (3d Cir.) (1985)
I.Facts
1.DialAmerica Marketing, Inc. is a telephone-marketing firm that operates in twenty states and maintains its principal place of business in Teaneck, New Jersey. A major aspect of DialAmerica's business is the sale of magazine renewal subscriptions by telephone to persons whose subscriptions have expired or ready to run out. They located subscribers' phone numbers by employing in-house researchers who would find numbers by consulting telephone books and calling directory-assistance or operators. The researcher would travel to DialAmerica's office in Teaneck and pick up cards, which contained the name and address of a subscriber whose telephone number was needed. They would write the numbers on the cards in a specified manner, and then return the completed cards to DialAmerica's office. After properly completing the magazine expire cards, and the researcher were asked to sign a document labeled an "Independent Contractor's Agreement. Upon signing the agreement to do home-research work, a worker was given a box of 500 cards to be researched. The worker was expected to set up an appointment to return the cards one week later. DialAmerica did not; require the home researchers to keep records of the hours that they worked. During the course of this program, six or seven of the home researchers acted as distributors for DialAmerica, picking up and delivering the cards of other home researchers. In some cases, the distributors recruited new distributes and instructed them as to the proper method of completing the cards. Originally, DialAmerica instructed the distributors to require each of their researchers to sign the same independent contractor's agreement that was given to the other home researchers and retained copies of these signed agreements. DialAmerica paid its home researchers five cents for every completed telephone-number card. At the same time, DialAmerica was paying its in-house researchers the minimum-wage hourly rate. The piece rate paid to home researchers was eventually raised to seven cents and then to ten cents per card. Usually, one week after a home researcher had returned a group of cards; DialAmerica would make payment to that researcher of a check equal to the piece rate times the number of cards completed. They made no deductions from these checks. Distributors were paid a lump sum equivalent to one cent more than the going piece rate for every completed card they returned to DialAmerica, regardless of whether the card had been completed by them or their distributes. Initially, DialAmerica instructed the distributors to pay distributes the going piece rate and to keep the remaining one cent per card for themselves. Later, however, DialAmerica gave no instructions as to the amount to be paid to distributes, allowing the distributors to negotiate their own piece rates. II.PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Secretary of Labor filed the complaint in this action in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on December 30, 1981. Alleging that DialAmerica was willfully compensating the home researchers and distributors at a rate below the minimum wage, in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 215(a)(2), and that DialAmerica had willfully failed to keep adequate records of its employees' wages, hours, and other conditions of employment, in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 211, 215(a)(5). The Secretary requires DialAmerica from additional violation of the FLSA. By asking for the appropriate relief, including the payment of wages found to be due and owing. DialAmerica denied the Secretary's allegations, contending that its home researchers and distributors were not "employees" under the FLSA . III.Issue s

1)First, the court would determine whether the workers in question were "employees" under the FLSA. 2)Second, if they were held to be "employees," the court would then consider whether they were entitled to back pay or other...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • selling v/s marketing Essay
  • marketing Essay
  • Marketing Essay
  • Essay on Marketing
  • Essay on Marketing
  • Marketing Essay
  • Marketing Essay
  • Marketing Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free