Preview

Donald Trump's Immigration Reform

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Donald Trump's Immigration Reform
While Donald Trump was campaigning for his presidency, one of the platforms that he ran on was immigration reform. His immigration reform included extreme vetting of refugees and immigrants to protect the United States from terrorist attacks. On January 27, 2017 President Trump signed an Executive order that instantly imposed a 3-month ban on immigrants from seven major Muslim countries. The countries were Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The order also suspended the U.S. refugee assistance program for 4 months and placed an indefinite ban on refugees from Syria. The Executive order also included anyone with a visa, green card or work permit from the seven countries listed. This action was taken to give the new government …show more content…
Gaetz explains in "The Pros and Cons of the President's Immigrant Travel Ban", “I wish so much that President Trump’s Executive order were unnecessary. I wish that we lived in a world that was more stable and secure, where America could welcome with open arms anyone from anywhere for whatever reason at whatever cost. But the reality is that American taxpayers can’t pay for everything, and American families cannot shoulder the risks of insecurity for the consequences of terrible foreign policy decisions that have been made over the last eight years” (14). Gaetz believes that much of the frenzy surrounding the travel ban is being created by the media and is convoluting the actual purpose of the travel ban. The travel ban is not exclusively about banning all Muslims, but to take a closer look at immigrants who are coming from countries that breed terror, discontent and anti-Americanism. The United States need to do a better job of screening those immigrants to keep our citizens safe from …show more content…
Aaron David Miller, who is currently a Global Affairs Analyst for CNN, explained in “Why travel ban could backfire”, “Looking at the data since 9/11 leads one to the inescapable conclusion that the real threat to the US homeland comes not as a result of those recently admitted into the US as refugees, or with immigrant or nonimmigrant visas, but from home grown jihadis who have been radicalized here, and are either US citizens or legal permanent residents (paragraph 8). While it may seem that President Trump is trying to look out for the American people, it does not seem that we need to worry about those escaping war zones. The ones we need to be cautious with are those radicalized by the Islamic State, these individuals can be born in America or naturalized citizens. We do not have a test that can determine the true patronage of those that live in this country. The travel ban is targeting Muslims which could isolate and stigmatize American Muslims, which in turn could cause resentment towards the government. Banning an individual from freedom and safety based on the country of origin, is not what America is about and should not be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Trump's presidential campaign which was fueled by immigration, he has followed through with his promises, and has changed the strategies of how deporting illegal immigrants is carried out. That include ICE has been performing raids throughout the country raiding homes and deporting illegal immigrants back to…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shock, disbelief and terror were just enough for a country to be flipped upside down. The attacks on the United States of America on September 11, 2001 sent the country into a frenzy about the safety of civilians. Both the elected leaders and average citizens were faced to answer the question of who, in their eyes, could be trusted. After the attack, not only were Muslim- Americans suddenly seen as evil by the American people, but a program was initiated which required immigrants from specific countries to register with the government in order to screen for any risks to the nation.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. immigration policy changed drastically with the “Homeland Security Act” and “the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act”. It became hard for tourists, foreign students. “The Bush Administration created the Department of Homeland Security in 2002, The Immigration, Naturalization Service and the U.S. Customs Service — both formerly part of the Department of Justice — were consolidated into the newly formed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE. The agency has overseen a massive increase in deportations, which have nearly doubled since 9/11.” From How 9/11 Changed America: Four Major Lasting Impacts (With Lesson plans) by Matthew Green. The Homeland Security Act is reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism, and minimize damage and assist in recovery for terrorist attacks that occur in the United States. To prevent anything from attack…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The TRO restricts the enforcement of President Trump's executive order widely known as the "Travel Ban" or "Muslim Ban". The executive order bans individuals from seven countries entry to the U.S.A. for 90 days, suspends the refugee program for 120 days and suspends Syrian refugees indefinitely. The order also states that exceptions may be made in some cases "when in the national interest". However, it does not provide any explanation as to what qualifies as being in the national interest, or who evaluates the cases. The order goes on to direct that when the refugee program resumes operation, refugees of certain religions would have prioritized applications. The government insisted that the bans were a matter of protecting the nation from terrorism. The bans were put into place immediately, causing a widespread and very controversial effect.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 27, 2017. The order bans citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for at least 90 days. The order also suspended refugee admission program of the US for 120 days. US officials added that the order is only a first step toward a wider ban, which is aimed at protecting the US from terrorist attacks. The executive order is in line with President Trump’s campaign pledge. He promised a total and complete shutdown of Muslim immigration during his presidential campaign.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the beginning of Trump's campaign, he has boldly said his beliefs on illegal immigration and deportation. This has caused an increase of white extremist groups to come to the surface. Before, many of these groups were thought of as having very exaggerated views on immigration, but now that their views have been talked about so often by Trump, this is not the case. Many of the white supremacist groups believe that they have been getting more support and attention since Trump's candidacy. He has given people who seemed to be drowned out from the political system a drive to stand up for the issues they believe need to be changed. The organizations believe that Trump has shown the world that we should be talking about things that are often…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Trump recently carried out an executive order which blocked refugees and Muslims from the countries of Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Iran, Iraq, Yemen and Libya from entering the U.S. Though many of the government's officials, along with U.S. representatives, thought that this action would help in protecting the United States borders, and ensuring a safe environment, it only worsened it. “Since its signing, the measure has led to the detention of more than 100 people who…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Extreme vetting is a positive addition to the United States current immigration laws, it is evident undocumented refugees need to be have background checks to keep our citizens safe. Extreme vetting is not a new idea, plans for it were made directly after 9/11 but President Bush never followed through with the plan. The plan only affects 7 countries, Iran, Iraq,Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. The extreme vetting plan is going to be temporary, its is planned to be in use for 120 days. According to the United State’s Records in 2016 it was the year with the most admitted Muslim Refugees, (46% of the 85,000 refugees entered into the US were muslim).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive orders enable the President of the United States of America to enact a pseudo-law without the need of approval from Congress. Some presidents make more use of them than others. For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in the early 30's, took the most advantage of them due to the Great Depression. Similar to FDR, President Trump is making the most of his privilege in the White House, but in contrast to FDR's helping initiative, one of President Trump's executive orders were instituted on a discriminatory basis that benefits his many business ties.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vetting System

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people opposed Trump’s travel ban stating that none of the countries on the list proposed a threat to our national security. In many ways they are right. Trump claims that the countries on the list were responsible for 9/11. The original order also stated that green card holders and people with valid visas to work in the United States could not travel between our country and theirs until a more effective and efficient vetting system was put in place. In many ways, Trump is right. Our vetting system does take an extraordinarily long time and many immigrants find themselves waiting decades before their citizenship is granted. A more efficient system would prompt a quicker and easier entry to our country. However, constitutionally, you are not allowed to discriminate against any human regardless of religion, race or ethnicity. We can corroborate with the court cases like Korematsu’s that the detention or removal of a group of people from an entire country should never be allowed and that regardless of the war we are fighting. Citizens from those countries, unless under federal watch, should not have their rights infringed upon them due to scapegoating. Many great people from around the world come to work in the United States due to it’s endless opportunity and also many times because of the rights granted to each individual. A personal example is with my father. As a director at Google, he spends his time with people of every race, religion, sex for the majority of his day. Trump’s travel ban would prevent many people like the men and women my father works with from continuing to support their families, and would also prevent them from trying to build a life for themselves. In times of war, in many ways the President should take executive action to ensure the safety of our…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Donald Trump’s first days in office could be considered well spent in terms of issuing several executive orders. On his second full working day, he signed an order that gave green light to two controversial pipeline constructions, the Keystone XL and Dakota Access, and was immediately followed by an order countering several provisions of Obamacare. On Tuesday, he reinstated the ban on international counselling, froze federal government hiring, and withdrew from the trans-Pacific Partnership.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, the State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly screening and evaluating the visa applications of several of the nineteen foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly three thousand Americans in the September 11 attacks, which is another reason as to why this order is crucial. This bill has both positively and negatively affected the United States of America. It has positively impacted the U.S.A by making the screening process of new immigrants/tourists more in-depth and lengthy. Due to this executive order, numerous foreign-born individuals have been caught and charged in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001, including foreign nationals who entered the United States after receiving student, visitor, employment visas, or who entered through the United States refugee resettlement program. However, just like with anything new, there is backlash and negative reactions to it. The main negative feelings towards the order are because travel has been banned from seven Muslim-majority countries. Now while this is quite an extreme action for both innocent and potentially dangerous people, it is not…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is an immigration ban? An immigration ban is an executive order that is being enforced by the US president, Donald Trump. This ban has been around for many years but has been very lenient and has allowed many illegal Muslims, Mexicans, and other nationalities into the country that have killed US citizens or have destroyed cities or jobs of the hard working Americans. “You now have a president who really takes seriously the tremendous threat of international terrorism and is prepared to take steps that are very tough-minded and that are going to inconvenience some people,” former Speaker Newt Gingrich said. I think that an immigration ban is one of the best things that Donald Trump could do for this country in order to make America great…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This strongly limited access to the United States of America is, in my opinion, a social injustice. The number of individuals forced to abscond because of conflict in the Middle East (where all of the countries affected by the travel ban are located) was more than 4.3…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Richard Posner, a writer for The Atlantic, claims, “They [civil liberties] should be curtailed, to the extent that the benefits in greater security outweigh the costs in reduced liberty” (Posner). Posner claims that civil liberties should be outweighed by national security, but he does not think about the weight of these laws. In the Bill of Rights, the right to religious freedom is clearly defined. If the government kept thousands of people out of this country, it would be in complete defiance of our constitution by not letting the people practice their religion in our country. If these people were kept out of this country, it would be completely nonbeneficial. This is because the people of the Islamic religion bring rich culture and diversity to our country. The people as a whole aren’t dangerous or bad, so it would be absolutely absurd to keep them out. In a separate article, Huffington Post writer Jesse Andreozzi questions the decision to keep out the Syrian refugees in saying, “If we turn away refugees, doesn't that add to ISIS' propaganda that perpetuates the distortion that Americans are intolerant and jingoistic?” (Andreozzi). Andreozzi’s question is a very thought-provoking one. The idea of keeping thousands of Syrian refugees out just because the majority is Muslim is very maddening. Imagine being a Syrian refugee and being shut out of a country just because of the religion your people practices. The Syrians would be infuriated and more likely to resort to violence out of their frustration. People are being tortured and degraded halfway across the globe and for the United States to ignore that would completely go against the country’s morals and laws. Despite the fact that national security is very important, our civil and religious liberties should not be sacrificed in place of…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays