Preview

Donald Trump's Freakonomics Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Donald Trump's Freakonomics Essay
Early in his race to become a Presidential Candidate, Donald Trump make a erratic statement of banning all immigration of people of Islamic faith. An extreme statement directed at restricting the flow of Radical Islam. His statement made the general American public question his intelligence, as any intelligent man knows that there are extremists in every aspect of society. Freakonomics was written by Steven Levitt and offers some unique stances on American economic issues. For someone to buy into Levitt’s ideas, Levitt may want to consider presenting his information in a significantly less blount format as well as adding more definition to his arguments. Using his views on abortion and production driving incentives, it be can proved that his ideas need revision. Sometimes the best way to take off a band aid isn’t to rip it off quickly. Such a rigid shock can cause excessive discomfort. He argues that crime has dropped in that past 20 years because of the legalization of abortion. Abortion is an extremely sensitive topic and debating it, in the USA, has essentially become taboo. Families that tend to practice abortion, using that phrase loosely, are more likely to raise children that become criminals. They aren’t able to raise the children well in their economic struggle. …show more content…
When writing a book or rather developing any argument, the only way you can convince someone of something is by making them believe in what you believe. Otherwise they will refuse to change, and you have wasted your efforts. An additional argument can be made about his claim on incentives. The idea seems logical, but it lacks statistical validity. Within the book Levitt has some unique views. However he does not offer the strongest claim, and could use some improvements. Whether it be arguing the effects of abortion or the way incentives motivate people. His book is written sloppy. People don’t buy into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Freakonomics, Steven Levitt & Stephen Dubner use the the rhetorical strategy of juxtaposition, putting two groups who are connected by some unseen trend or attribute. They do this to give the reader a wider conception and a more vivid explanation to why they are similar or different. They compare Nature vs Nurture, Higher Class Names vs Lower Class Names, Crack gang vs Mcdonalds, and Black names vs White Names.…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Esteemed economists and writers, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, wrote the book Freakonomics to delve into the inner workings of economics. Freakonomics discloses the unpredictable effects of incentives beneath ordinary situations. Levitt and Dubner sail on an informal tone by asking questions and breaking up their writing, in order to maintain a witty connection with the audience.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, while watching the documentary, I was interested in how the ban of abortion impacted the national crime rates in the 1990’s and 2000’s. It was found that the cohort of children born between 1967 and 1969 had lower crime rates than those born prior to 1976. Meanwhile, the cohort of children born after 1970 had higher crime rates than those born prior to the ban of abortion. However, the degree of change of crime rates between these cohorts is minimal. However, Pop-Eleches does admit that there exist a variety of factors that contribute to the country’s crime rates, and that his findings are not dependent on the banning of abortion (Pop-Eleches 2006:767).…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Levitt and Dubner begin an argument with a murder crime of a woman called Kitty Genovese. Genovese was attacked by a man in a residential area and died because of the bystander effect. As New York newspaper reported, 38 people saw the murder but no one called the police or stop the assailant. This murder case astonished so many people and some people blamed the 38 residents, thought they're indifferent. Then, writers mention the rise of crime in the USA and analyze three reasons of this situation: the policy of releasing prisoners, post-war baby boom and violent TV show. (98-99) When I read this case, I feel angry about the 38 residents and think they're indifferent. At the same time, I also wonder why the residents are so apathetic. Maybe they thought other people will help Genovese; maybe they didn't…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book Freakonomics is generally a very informative with little bias in the work. Both sides of the argument would be presented in almost in all situations. Levitt did assume that social incentives would mostly be undermined by economic or moral incentives. The nonlinear development of the book does make it somewhat difficult to understand for individuals with little prior knowledge on the…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Levitt's Freakonomics

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    The central thesis and argument of this segment of Freakonomics are the reasons why the rates of crime in the United States rapidly reduce in recent years. I think this argument that Steven Levitt reasonably explains about decreasing American criminal rates in possible points. As Levitt’s explanations, he is arguing that an increase in the reliance on prisons, innovative policing strategies, changes in the crack market, lawful enforcements including to increase in police nationwide and gun-control laws, and a legalization of abortion. I personally also think that all of these reasons are definitely…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pretend we are still in the early 2000s. Could you have ever imagined the day where Donald Trump, a businessman and television personality, would be in the running for the 2016 Presidential Nomination? If you did not, you are probably thinking how did he get as far as to become the Republican Party nominee. Was it just for laughs at the beginning or are people voting for him because they actually do believe he can “make America great again”? Could there be one soul reason as to why people are voting for him? Many people think that it is because of the economy that Trump is getting votes. Author, Jennifer Rubin wrote an article on her blog, The Right Turn, for The Post, “Trump’s Entire Economic Narrative is a Hooey” where she elaborates her opinion on whether or not the economy collapsing is one the main reasons Trump is getting votes. Rubin…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freakonomics

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the novel Freakonomics, Levit and Dubner try to take a unique approach to analyzing reasons behind why things occur in our society. Essentially, “What this book is about is stripping a layer or two from the surface of modern life and seeing what is happening underneath.” (10) A perfect example of this is how they discovered that the legalization of abortion was the cause of crime dropping to its lowest level in thirty-five years. While most expert economists simply attributed the drop to the wellness of the economy, the increase in gun control laws and the new policing strategies, Levit and Dubner searched for other possibilities where no one else thought to look. That is when they realized that approximately twenty years before the drastic drop in crime, abortion was legalized. Studies have shown that “… a child born into an adverse family environment is far more likely than other children to become a criminal.” (4) Thus, this theory was proven further by the fact that around the time when these children would have begun committing crimes, there was significantly less crime.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She agrees with Lykken that parents do have a impact on their children's outcome (i.e. Children that were not abused tend to make friends more easily than children that have been abused.) Harris states other causes for the rise in crime such as increase in violence in the media, and the lack of unity against an enemy since the Cold War. Harris uses or disproves specific examples; however, she also uses many reference to herself, and what she got out of certain statistics. This is an informative piece written for scholars. Since she makes references to herself it is important that the reading have a well rounded knowledge of the topic in order to form their own opinions based on Harris'…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    b. Thesis ­ There has been a new spread across United States that increases youth crime: its ruthless…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freakonomics Essay

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most interesting excerpt of “Freakonomics” was the connection made between crime rates and abortions. This passage was fascinating for a few reasons. The first reason being that it makes absolute and complete sense, so much so that it should be common sense. This correlation between the legalization of abortion and the rate of crime going down is so simple, yet so incredibly profound. This piece of information, if used correctly, can totally obliterate the argument that pro-choice is a negative thing for society. On a more personal note, I found the concept that the crime rate really is not as high as it was in the 90’s to be encouraging. One thing I really do not enjoy is when an adult says something along the lines of, “The world really isn’t what it used to be,” when referring to safety. As much as I do understand that “back in the day” things were much more relaxed and safer, all I can do is accept how the world is now and not let it get in the way of my life. With the decline of the crime rate in the 90’s due to abortion, it is a great feeling to think that where our world is, safety-wise, is not at its lowest point, and therefore we know that it can be handled.…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article states that Messrs Donohue and Steven D. Levitt “did not run the test they thought they had—an ‘inadvertent but serious computer programming error’” (Oops-onomics). Economists Christopher Foote and Christopher Goetz looked into the facts and test of Donohue and Levitt in order to recognize if their conclusion was correct. Their evidence and tests were not run correctly, which reduces the number of abortions that lowered crime rates by almost one-half. Furthermore, the article also states that Donohue and Levitt “seek to explain arrest totals (e.g., the 465 Alabamians of 18 years of age arrested for violent crime in 1989), not arrest rates per head (i.e., 6.6 arrests per 100,000)” (Oops-onomics), which helps support the claim there is less crime taking place, because “a smaller cohort will obviously commit fewer crimes in total” (Oops-onomics). Additionally, when Foote and Goetz used arrest rates per head for their research, the amount of crime rose, disproving Donohue and Levitt’s claim that abortions help stop crime. That being said, Levitt and Dubner’s inferences drawn from an insufficient amount of evidence, leads many critics to accuse them of hasty…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fewer Americans are going to prison. The first thing causing that, is a lower crime rate. According to the text, “… crime rates actually decreased leading up to 2012…” Next, the citizens and the government started to change their thinking on imprisonment. The text states, “Many would argue Americans- politicians and lawmakers as well as the general public – had begun to understand that locking people up did not necessarily result in a reduction in crime.” Finally, there were better things to spend the money on. The author wrote, “Americans were more interested in spending money in education and healthcare than locking people…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The norms of society are infectiously pervasive. Sometimes it’s these norms, which don’t let the society appreciate the potential it has causing the innocent victims of society to turn into criminals. It is not just the society which plays a role in creating criminals in fact family and home life is quite influential as well. We notice this when Mayella a nineteen-year-old commits the unspeakable crime of accusing a black man of a rape- who is completely innocent. Even though this event may portray Mayella as a criminal and a racist being, but Mayella herself is a victim of society’s prejudice thinking, her family, and, loneliness.…

    • 641 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernard Madoff Essay

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page

    I think Bernard Madoff was able to woo the wealthiest and most intelligent clients because he had a flawless reputation on Wall Street. He also served as chairmen on the NASDAQ stock exchange and his investment company was ranked as “one of the top market makers in NASDAQ traded stocks” (Gregoriou & Lhabitant, 2009). Due to Madoff’s investment company being very successful, he was able to build close friendships with wealthy influences businessmen in New York as well as other parts of the world and due to his investors receiving nice returns, Madoff’s investors would recommend others, which helped in getting more elite investors. When Madoff was recommended to others, he was very selective, because he only wanted people that were very wealthy.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays