Don't Waste Your Time with Trivial Things
There are some people saying that the language is sexist. Generally, considering the words that are mostly used for both genders such as man, mankind, chairman, or the word history, especially feminist women see this issue as a big problem. Those people may present the famous philosopher Aristotle's utterance "Man is a rational animal" as evidence. However; when looked at the etymology of the word "man", it is easily seen that the original meaning of "man" was "human being". If it was used to mean "human being" in the past, what is wrong with its usage in the present? In addition, "history" might seem as a compound word composed of "his" and "story" at first look, but it is wrong to claim that "history" is a sexist word. Humour writer Josh L. says in one of his articles that: "History is not a sexist word. The word historia' was created in a time/language that did not have gender specific prefixes". So, "history" is not a compound word composed of "his" and "story" as it seems. Now, forget about all I have said. What I mean is that if people insist on and go on worrying about sexist language, they are doomed to pay much less attention to other more important kinds of sexism like custom violence, domestic violence and sexual exploitation of women.
To begin with, the matter of "custom violence" is one of those important sexism types. Perhaps, the most obvious one in Turkey is polygamy. Specially, the eastern people maintain the belief that the right of a man is four women as if they are their property or workers. Men of that region see no inconvenience in making their wife give birth to as many children as they can do. Sometimes, one of those people shows up in the news and tells the number of his children proudly even if he doesn't know the names; by the way, they don't feel any discomfort about not knowing. Also, in some parts of Africa, women have no right of inheritance on her husband's property after his death....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document