Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Don't Ask Don't Tell

Better Essays
1177 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Don't Ask Don't Tell
Ciara Loughnane
Period 3
Basom
CBA Research Paper
Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is not a joking matter. It is the only law that enforces shame” (Lt. Dan Choi). In 1993 Congress passed the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy. The policy mandated discharging any openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual members of the army. The Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy was removed on December 18th 2010, (huffingtonpost.com). Was it the correct choice to remove the U.S army’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy? Yes, it was. The Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy was removed because it violated many rights such as the first, fifth, ninth, and fourteenth Amendments in the Constitution, the outcome of the court case of Air Force Lt. Col. Victor Fehrenbach, and the reasons the policy was put into place were not as strong as the reasons for taking it away. The Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy did not follow the rights given to every citizen such as freedom of speech and expression, right to pursuit of happiness, and right to due process. Serving in the military is a right that should not be denied to any minority, including those that are gay, lesbian, and bisexual. But this wasn’t the case, for 17 years the U.S army discharged any openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual member without a trial. “The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network reports that since 1993 more than 13,000 gay and lesbian troops have been fired with no trial or chance to defend themselves” (ajc.com). This violated four of the Amendments made in the Bill of Rights. The first Amendment, right to freedom of speech and expression. The “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy stopped gay’s, lesbians, and bisexual members from being open about their sexuality. This is a violation of their freedom of speech, (The Constitution). The freedom of speech is compromised as well as the danger of combining church and state. The fifth Amendment is violated because when a troop becomes openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual they are discharged from the army without a trial, violating their right to due process as it says in the fifth Amendment, (The Constitution). The ninth Amendment is right to pursuit of happiness. This is violated because the gay, lesbian, and bisexual troops can not be truly happy when they have to lie to everyone around them, (The Constitution). The fourteenth is then also violated because it says that all U.S citizens have the right to have all the rights listed in the Constitution, (The Constitution). Violated amendments are not the only things wrong with the U.S military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. In May 2008 a court case was brought to the U.S military attention, when a civilian from Idaho accused an U.S Air Force Lt of sexually assaulting him. The Lt in question was Victor Fehrenbach. He was a celebrated Air Force Lt. Fehrenbach has served in the army for 19 years, and if he was disbanded before serving for 20 years, then he would lose many benefit’s provided only to 20 year service men, (sldn.org). The accusation was dismissed as it had been proved false, but Fehrenbach told police during an interrogation that he did have consensual sex with the man in the privacy of his home, 60 miles from the base, (sldn.org). He did not know that military investigators were listening to his confession and obtained a recording of it. Fehrenbach’s lawyers argue he has never publicly said he 's gay and kept his sexuality private as required under "don 't ask, don 't tell." They also argue Fehrenbach 's conduct with a civilian in the privacy of his own home does not harm "morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion" in the military and that the government is unable to prove anything. The ruling in this court case was that Fehrenbach was innocent seeing as the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy was removed, (sldn.org). 72% of Americans supported the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t tell policy, (CNN.com). Why? Because the many cons of the policy outweigh the very few if any benefits. Disbanding the policy was the right thing to do given America’s struggle for equality. With the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy in place, not all soldiers were treated equally. They were denied their right to legal and social equality. This was because any openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual army member was disbanded from the military with no formal court hearing or chance to defend themselves. They were denied social equality by having to lie about their sexuality to all of those around them. Also, many U.S allies have laws that allow homosexuals to serve in their military’s. 25 countries allow gays, lesbians, and bisexual’s to serve openly, such as Canada, England, and Israel, (time.com). In Russia, homosexuals are only allowed to serve in the military during times of war. It can cost up to $50,000 to train one U.S solider. This money comes from taxpayers, and to have it just thrown away if the troop is found to be gay, lesbian, or bisexual is a horrible thing to do. It wastes money that could be used to help communities or other important situations. The reason’s for keeping the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy around for so long was that having open homosexuals in the army would decrease the moral of other soldiers, it goes against all religions and that would cause fighting between the troops, and many soldiers might get offended and leave the army. Now that the policy has been removed, these problems have been almost non-existent. In retrospect, the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy was a harmful law. This policy allowed the immediate deportation out of the army for any homosexual member. This violated many rights given in the United States Constitution, it violated the ruling in the court case of Lt Col Fehrenbach, and there were more things wrong with the policy than right things. These arguments proved that the policy was a bad idea and it was then repealed on December 18th 2010. The removal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy is the first step to every person in the United States becoming treated equally.

Work Cited
“About “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” www.sldn.org. Web 9th Apr. 2011. http://www.sldn.org/pages/about-dadt.
Ask, Ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Passes Senate 65-31.” Breaking News And Opinion on The Huffington Post. 18 Dec. 2010. Web 10 Apr. 2011 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/18/don’t-ask-don’t-tell- repeal_5_n_798636.html.
“Decorated Aviator Files Suit to Block “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Discharge.” Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. Web, 15. Apr. 2011. http://www.sldn.org/pages/icnw7oxy2malqe.
Hulse, Carl. “Senate Repeals Ban Against Openly Gay Military Personnel.” www.nytimes.com. 18 Dec. 2010. Web 10 Apr. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/us/politics/19cong.html.
“The Constitution of the United States” Amendment 1, Amendment 5, Amendment 9, and Amendment 14.

Loughnane

Cited: “About “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” www.sldn.org. Web 9th Apr. 2011. Ask, Ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Passes Senate 65-31.” Breaking News And Opinion on The Huffington Post. 18 Dec. 2010. Web 10 Apr. 2011 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/18/don’t-ask-don’t-tell- repeal_5_n_798636.html. “Decorated Aviator Files Suit to Block “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Discharge.” Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. Web, 15. Apr. 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Regulations implementing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell called for the mandatory discharge of all servicemembers who engaged in homosexual conduct, attempted to form a same-sex marriage, or indicated a “propensity” to engage in such acts or relationships, for instance, by making a “homosexual statement” indicating their sexual orientation.[27] Under these regulations, discharge was mandatory for all servicemembers in all of these circumstances except where the servicemember could demonstrate a predominantly heterosexual orientation.[28] Major Witt could not and did not attempt to deny her orientation or same-sex…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Don T Ask Dont Tell Essay

    • 2106 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Report of the Comprehensive Review of the Issues Associated with a Repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”…

    • 2106 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Sexual Orientation added to military's non-discrimination policy,” Patricia Kime is explaining how sexual orientation is added to the military's policy.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each American president has had to deal with controversial issues and sometimes scandals during their administration terms in office. How they address, or avert the issue impacts the perception to their leadership capability for our republic. Their policies are sculpted often by public opinion and historical context. President William Clinton is no exception and his handling of the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” controversy indicates that his policies, openly excluded gay and bisexual people from military service, and this shaped how America treated people of difference.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boy Scouts Case Summary

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is hard case to deal with because there are not many laws that will protect the LGBT group. There are tricky ways in which the law can be walked around it. In this case of homosexual discrimination the law looked on the discrimination part, but they took a turn where they made it seem as if the Boys Scout organization was having their right of free expression and association violated and this made them get out of the trouble they were in before. After doing this research I have learned more about the LGBT society and the amount of discrimination they are going through. More than that I am surprised how can the law be manipulated to make it seem as if the LGBT society is not being discriminated but organizations have the right to decide who do they let in or not without considering the person. This is extremely hard to analyze but I am glad that I took a chance to go in depth and draw my own conclusions and learn how laws are put in…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the controversial topic of homosexuality in the military there are two extremely fascinating sides to the story. Although there are many strong arguments in regard to this subject, I have chosen the ones which I find most compelling. If forming a fair opinion is what one seeks, it is absolutely imperative that every angle of each argument is carefully examined. Currently in place is the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that our legislature has implemented as a guideline for the military concerning who may or may not serve in our military. It is my personal belief that all men and women that are citizens of the United States are entitled to serve in the armed forces. Anything to the contrary to this notion would violate our constitution and basic human rights.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Homosexuals would present logistical problems. In the interest of heterosexuals, gays would have to be separated into their own barracks. And masses of gay men in a confined area = problem solved? The military would rather have social policies that resemble the likes of North Korea, Syria, and Iran, not Israel, Canada, and the UK. Repeal would infringe on heterosexual solders’ privacy. Social ostracism isn’t reason enough to practice mutual gaze aversion in the showers. The military shouldn’t use for social experiments. Truman’s desegregation of the military, which occurred before desegregation of the rest of American society, is certainly something to be frowned upon in…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sb1062 Research Paper

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They believe that laws like this would allow discriminatory actions by businesses. For example, because In N Out is a religious based company, they can refuse to give services to anyone that claims they are gay if In N Out believes that is against their religion to serve them. Similar laws like this will also allow individuals to discriminate against whomever they want as long as they believe is required by their religion. This reasons stands because the constitution was created to protect people from discrimination on the basis of race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity,…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was on December 21, 1993, that “Don’t ask, don’t tell” became the official United States policy on homosexuals who wanted to serve in the United States Military. This was just another step toward the direction of “change” that Clinton had promised the American people and accomplished.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1993 President William Clinton signed into law a policy that effectively bans gay, lesbian, and bisexual service in the military. This policy, Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT), gave the armed forces the right to discharge a soldier based on their sexual preferences. There are two main parts to the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. In the Don’t Ask section of the policy, a commander is not allowed to ask, and service members are not required to disclose their sexual orientation. The other part, Don’t Tell, claims a basis for discharge exists if "the member has said that he or she is a homosexual or bisexual, or made some other statement that indicates a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts." This act is seen as unconstitutional by many Americans and is currently hurting our military when we need it the most.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equality for soldiers of different sexual orientations has come slowly. In 1993 President Clinton enacted a policy which is known as “Don’t ask, don’t tell”. This rule allowed soldiers who did not openly discuss their homosexuality to legally serve in the military. Before that just being discovered as being gay was enough to get you an immediate dishonorable discharge. Some people were very worried that gay soldiers would pursue unwanted romantic relationships with their straight fellow soldiers and cause lots of discomfort in the barracks and in combat situations. Others worried that gay soldiers would be targets of harassment by straight soldiers. Both of these worries turned out to be unfounded and in 2010 soldiers of all sexual orientations…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It does seem logical to send home the homosexual soldier in order to prevent this unit cohesion. However this appearance of credibility changes when the other side of the argument is given. It is more logical to send home the “soldier who has prejudice in his heart, in this space where the military asks him to hold our core American values, [..]” (Gaga). When the logic is actually on the repealing side, this means that DADT has to be based off of morality. Former President Bill Clinton decided to make a compromise, but Gaga claims he did not make the decision that portrayed what America stands for. She believes he made the decision that had more morality and not more logic, and the reasons she and many others give for this accusation, outweighs the reasons given to say…

    • 2067 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dont Ask Dont Tell Policy

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gates, Gary J. (2007). Effects of "Don 't Ask, Don 't Tell" on Retention Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Military Personnel. UC Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0xt6v6tn…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1940s through 1960s, many LGBT struggle through their lifestyle, they were eventually seen as threat to the American security,Homosexuality was not condoned in the military, that homosexual soldiers were dishonorably discharged.However small group began stepping forward by expanding the cultural knowledge of the gay world, exposing people who may have never known of its existence.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The DOD will need to revise the Uniform Code of Military Justice and lay out crime and punishments for this class, and clarify what constitutes sexual harassment and discrimination. I’m not sure such undertakings can be considered “simple administrative changes.” Granted, there were similar concerns with the repeal of DADT, but that was a 20 year process. Gates and Herman (2015) estimate that approximately 15,500 TSM serve in the military. The Department of Defense has never queried the force or actually tried to quantify real numbers of possible TSM in the military, so this number is more of a guesstimate at most. There could indeed be 15,500 TSM, or there could be 50. Harrison-Quintana and Herman (2013) estimate that of the purported 15,500 TSM, approximately 90 percent of TSM are male to female (MTF). Therefore, any policy changes will affect female Soldiers significantly and disproportionately more than…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays