Domestic Violence - Why Women Stay

Topics: Domestic violence, Violence, Abuse Pages: 8 (2831 words) Published: May 9, 2005
Why Do Women Stay?
Domestic violence is a serious and complex plague of society that affects all, but women make up the largest number of victims in most case studies. In the United States alone, "1.5 million women are raped or physically assaulted by an intimate partner each year. More than 500,000 women victims require medical treatment, and 324,000 victims are pregnant at the time of assault" (Berlinger, "Taking" 42). Numbers like these show how intense the situation of domestic violence truly is. "Two women a week are killed by a current or former partner and domestic violence accounts for 22% of all recorded violent crimes" (Jamil 70). Domestic violence takes such a large number in percentages regarding violent crimes, yet often is dismissed by many with the idea that "this won't happen to me". Somehow, somewhere, domestic violence will touch everyone whether by someone they know or by televised publication. Though domestic violence affects men as well, the female subject is more often the victim. Domestic violence has a continuous cycle that has been influenced since birth and can be stopped with intervention but each victim's reason for staying will vary.

Researchers are still trying to understand domestic violence, what causes it and how far back psychologically does it go. A Scottish psychoanalyst, W. Ronald D. Fairbairn, conducted studies such as these. These studies had a grand influence on British object relations and he founded the "Object Relations Theory" and the "Dynamic Structure of the mind" (Stringer). Similarly to Sigmund Freud's "id", Fairbairn has levels of the internal unified ego that will split as a self defense mechanism in relation to the emotional pain a child is feeling (Celani 62). This unconscious strategy is necessary. The internal unified ego is composed of the self-esteem of humans and is divided into three parts according to Fairbairn, the libidinal, the anti-libidinal, and the central ego. In the 1940's Fairbairn states, "The first psychological consequence of deprivation on the infant is fixation on the maternal object," where the infant will focus its attention on the non-gratifying object and over time develops a huge backlog of neglectful thoughts and resentment (Celani 63). Fairbairn's reference to an "object" is referring to the mother or father in charge of taking care of the child at hand. In this quote he comments on the mother because at the time of this theory it was primarily the mother's responsibility to care for the children. As the child grows, the needs for fulfillment will be displaced from the parent to a future lover (63). This psychological damage can be devastating and the child will eventually have to deal with her internal pain. She will take the depiction of the parent that has hurt her and internalize it, turning that image into an idea that she can treasure and count on as her happy place in times of need (63). The depth of internalization depends on the level of neglect. It is difficult for a child to stay attached to a parent that she fears and hates the most (64). Splitting of the unified ego allows the child to "protect its hope for love by objects in the future," similarly to a person with split personalities, only internalized (65). "The child's sub ego that relates exclusively to the frustrating and rejecting object was called the anti-libidinal ego," by Fairbairn, if the child looses her mother in reality a substitute figure is needed, but if "the father or any substitute is missing, the personality creates one imaginatively," which relates to the internalizing image that the child has made to be good to her (65). When this imagination gives promise of love, it is referred to as the exciting object and the sub ego that relates to this exciting object is called the libidinal ego (65). "Defensive splitting is not found in children who have parents who gratify their legitimate needs and celebrate them as persons in their own right," (66). These children...

Cited: Berlinger, June. "Domestic Violence." Nursing Aug. 2001: 58-63.
Berlinger, June. "Taking an Intimate Look at Domestic Violence." Nursing Oct. 2004: 42-46.
Berlinger, June. "Why Don 't You Just Leave Him?" Nursing Apr. 1998: 34-40.
Busch, Noel Bridget. "Comparisons of Moral Reasoning Levels Between Battered and Non-battered Women." Journal of Social Work Education 40 (2004): 57-71.
Celani, David P. "Applying Fairbairn 's Object Relations Theory to the Dynamics of the Battered Woman." American Journal of Psychotherapy 53 (1999):60-73.
Hadley, Susan M. "Linking the Orthopedic Patient with Community Family Violence Resources." Orthopedic Nursing 21 (2002): 19-24.
Jamil, Tanvir. "Domestic Violence." Pulse 4 Oct. 2004: 70.
Marvin, Douglas R. "The Dynamics of Domestic Abuse." FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 66 (1997): 13-18.
Oeltjen, Holly. "Stop the Beating." Women in Business 44 (1992): 20-23.
Starsoneck, Leslie, and Sharon Friedman. "Taking Exception to Asymmetrical Role-Taking: Comparing Battered and Non-battered Women." Social Work 42 (1997): 113-115.
Stringer, Kathie
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Why Does She Stay? Domestic Violence Essay
  • domestic violence Essay
  • Abuse and Violence Domestic Violence Essay
  • Essay on Domestic Violence Against Women
  • Domestic Violence Against Women Research Paper
  • Essay about Domestic Violence Against Women
  • Domestic Violence Against Women Essay
  • Domestic Violence on Women in Society Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free