Top-Rated Free Essay

Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Although the aspirations and goals of states are often motivated by external political pressures, analysis of recent foreign policy decisions demonstrates how internal political forces can play equally crucial roles in the pursuit and execution of these objectives. Thus, it would be invalid to claim that domestic politics and the nature of regimes play minor roles in either the goals a state pursues or the means it employs to reach them. By understanding how the diffusion of power in governments affect policy decisions, one can develop increased awareness of the linkages that exist between the internal pressures of domestic politics and the external forces of foreign politics.
Before discussing the impact of domestic politics on foreign policy objectives and their execution, one must first understand the different types of policies that states pursue. The foreign policy of states can be directed toward the protection and enhancement of valued possessions ("possession goals") or intended to improve the environment in which it operates (milieu goals). More specifically, possession goals pertain to national possessions where states aim to enhance or preserve one or more things they value such as territory, permanent membership in international organizations like the UN Security Council, or access to trade areas. And while milieu goals are different from possession goals in that states that work towards achieving them are not seeking to defend or increase their possessions but instead attempting to shape conditions beyond their national boundaries, milieu goals can be seen as an indirect way of achieving possession goals. A nation that pursues a milieu goal—such as the promotion of peace through the signing of international treaties—provides clear benefits for the international community but ultimately serves to enhance its own national security by creating a safer environment where its national possessions are protected from external threats. But for many states, whether their foreign policy objectives assume the form of possession goals or milieu goals, the pursuit and execution of these goals are often constrained by the powers of domestic politics. And in the case of American foreign policy, the Constitution of the United States as well as recent history provides compelling support to this claim.
American foreign policy is made through a fragmented and fractured process. The United States Constitution states that the president shares power with Congress in the development of foreign policy. As the commander in chief, the president plays a significant role in shaping foreign policy. The president possesses the power to appoint senior cabinet members, commit troops and conduct high level talks with foreign governments. Congress, on the other hand, has the power to ratify treaties, confirm the president's appointees and approve budgetary measures. And while the president has the ability to commit troops, only Congress has the authority to declare war. Despite criticisms of the American policy making process describing it as inefficient and slow moving, the main purpose and thus benefit of the constitutional separation of power is the framework of checks and balances that safeguard against monopolization of foreign policy decision making.
But despite the provisions outlined in the Constitution outlining the separation of power between the executive and legislative branch in the formulation of foreign policy, congressional influence over foreign policy decisions waned after World War II. During the Vietnam War, the Johnson and Nixon administrations became increasingly secretive and monopolized foreign policy decision authority. Ultimately, however, the growing imbalance of influence of the executive branch in foreign policy decisions led to the creation of the War Powers Act. The Act stipulated that the president was required to report to Congress within 48 hours after the beginning of hostilities. The president could continue hostilities for a maximum of sixty days in the absence of congressional authorization and then could take 30 days more to complete withdrawal of US forces. In short, the War Power Act of 1974 allowed congress to stop war at any time by passing a concurrent resolution. US forces could be brought home from a war or any other circumstance involving hostilities by a majority vote of both the house and senate. Despite the problematic issues of enforcement that surround it, the War Powers Act provides an example of how domestic politics—in this case congressional interests—can play a major role in the conduct of foreign policy.
In terms of the prisoner's dilemma, the influence of domestic politics on foreign policy often leads to suboptimal outcomes. The US does not follow a rational actor model in regards to the formation of foreign policy. Instead, competing ideas drive foreign policy and often result in the adoption of suboptimal policies. A recent example of this was the defeat of President Clinton's Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty by the Senate in 1999. While President Clinton and the Senate Democrats viewed the CTBT as a milieu goal intended to reduce the threat of nuclear proliferation in the international environment, Senate Republicans perceived the CTBT as a threat to American possessions—namely the primacy of US nuclear superiority and deterrence capability—and thus sought the defeat of the treaty as a possession goal. The Senate Republicans fought against the treaty because they saw it as an attempt by the US to shape the international environment at the cost of defending against and deterring security threats. Their reasoning was that dishonest states could circumvent international verification systems and conduct nuclear testing secretly or even perform tests with blatant disregard to the treaty since only their signatures and not the fear of military punishment promised their cooperation. But more importantly, the Senate Republicans argued that without the ability to test, the American nuclear arsenal could be potentially less reliable and that advances in weaponry would be stalled, thus diminishing the superior deterrence and defensive capabilities of the US against nuclear threats. Domestic political concerns over the national defense implications of the CBTB led to the eventual defeat of the treaty.
Although there are strong indications that domestic politics play a significant role in the pursuit and achievement of foreign policy goals, some critics continue to argue that the influence of domestic politics and regimes on foreign policy is minimal. According to the Realist Model, the state is viewed as the most important actor rather than the individual, and it discounts the influence of domestic politics when analyzing national interests. Under the lens of the Realist Model, the actions of states can be interpreted without reference to domestic politics or leadership. Realists argue that the interests of states transcend domestic politics and leadership change because that the broad orientation of foreign and defense policies are unchanging. Although the realist model may be most appropriate for analyzing actions when vital interests are at stake such as in times of crises, it seems to have little explanatory power for national security policy making in times without crisis.
Although the aspirations and goals of states are often partially motivated by external pressures, it is important to recognize that internal forces also play equally crucial roles in the pursuit and execution of these objectives. The decisions of foreign policymakers must take into account domestic political considerations. This fact is especially evident in the political landscape of the United States, where the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branch allows Congress to act as a counterweight to the power of the president. All states, whether their governments are democratic or authoritarian, must contend with domestic political considerations when evaluating foreign policy decision.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The primary goal of foreign policymaking is to ensure state survival. Without foreign policy our world will be in chaos. It is our government’s strategy in dealing with other nations. While both President and Congress each has their own role in foreign policymaking, the President’s role is to enforce decisions and the Congress is to approve treaty making powers.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Foreign Public Policy

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stage II Policy Formulation: What policy was formulated to address the issue? Who were the…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foreign/Domestic Policy

    • 1711 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "As the 1900's gave way to the new millennium, it became increasingly clear that a new era in American (and world) history had begun. The old era had been dominated by the Cold War struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. The new era was defined by the rise of a new global economy...the ways in which the world's peoples lived, worked, and governed themselves. Global communication, trade, and capital flow all grew rapidly..." (Griffith, Baker 531). The United States rose to being the most powerful military supremacy nation in the world due to Reagan and Bush's destruction of the Cold War, bridging the 80's into the new 90's. George Bush's CIA and ambassadorial experience provided Americas key to our foreign policy negotiations, aiding in our nations leadership over the world. This defeat and new era caused our domestic and social society within America into a state of confusion and caused Americans to question what role they would play in this new society. "Not only did the Cold War define America's stance in the world, dictating foreign policy choices from southeast Asia to Latin America; it defined the contours of domestic politics as well," (Chafe 549). How can we believe now after September 11, that we still or always have had leadership or supremacy in this world? How could the heart of our country be damaged so much affecting our nation as a whole? This recent tragedy damaged the core of our patriotism changing foreign and domestic policy after the 90's. During the 90's, a time of new cultural expression and power, the US was willing to use any economic, political, or military force necessary to uphold the new global system. After the Reagan legacy, President Bill Clinton created the "New Democrats," which, "sought to replace the party's older industrial and agricultural bases with a new, if unwieldy, coalition of women, minorities, social liberals, and technological progressives," (Griffith/Baker 533). In looking at…

    • 1711 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1790s, the United States was troubled by both domestic and foreign affairs. As the new nation began to develop, relations with France would inspire foreign affairs and the rise of political parties would control domestic affairs. Throughout this time period, the American leaders experienced domestic and foreign affairs that came to be important in the rise of the new nation. Beginning with the election of George Washington to be the first president, domestic affairs played a key role in shaping American. The most important of the foreign affairs is the French Revolution, corresponding with Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation. Both domestic and foreign affairs were very important in shaping America. However, affairs at home were much more significant.…

    • 792 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War Powers Act of 1973

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States of America holds the position in the world as a nation in which foreign policy is focused and debated as a matter of embittered public outrage and controversy. This is the reality not only among the party in office and their equivalent opponents but mainly within the very party themselves. It is much truer within the party that is controlling the executive branch. This criticism thrown at foreign policy is not that evil. It is a well meaning constructive criticism that tells the incoherence of policies passed by the executive branch. However, the fault is not likely coming from a flawed national character or among the attitudes of the leaders but the circumstances that surround it. Such circumstances comprise an increasing external challenge coupled with congressionally mandated restraints on the executive branch. The combination of both provides a dangerous whipsaw that can render American foreign policy as ineffective.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which five presidents did you think were the best with foreign and domestic policies? Have you ever thought about which president did best with this? There is some presidents that contribute more than others to our country. I think the three presidents that contributed the most to domestic and foreign policies of the United States government is Madison, Monroe, and Adams.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Foreign Policy Apush

    • 4368 Words
    • 18 Pages

    THE RISE OF THE USA AS A WORLD POWER (1890 1945) USA Presidents A Chronology 1. George Washington (1789-97)…

    • 4368 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Choose a major US diplomatic crisis to review. After some research, write a 2-page on the crisis. Focus on how the U.S. State Department worked to diffuse the crisis.…

    • 906 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The goal of any nation has and the means it uses to pursue them are influenced by its traditions, core values, ideology, and advantages and limitations imposed by its geographical locations, size, and wealth relative to other nations. Here, American foreign policy terms include Physical Security, Physical Security of neighbors and allies, Economic security, and Extending our sphere of influence.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Foreign Policy

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The U.S Foreign policy goals keep an important function of the U.S. Foreign policy serves many certain features which directly involves to the U.S and the globe such as defeating the terrorist threat within the U.S, reducing the job loss by cooperating foreign trade and attracting foreign investors, achieving energy independence, and creating a balance of power with other countries. Also, foreign policy associates to the globe issues such as enhancing peace in the world, securing the global environment, stopping genocide and trafficking in women and children, ending dictatorships and spreading democratic values, rebuilding alliances to solve international problems. Obviously, foreign policy has a vast effect on the U.S, so making foreign…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    other sovereign states.” () Now, the main component of foreign policy is the display of…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Foreign Policy

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As the world has been increasingly interconnected, every country’s economy and national security depends greatly on those of others and as one of the biggest and most powerful countries in the world, the United States of American always has a great impact on foreign countries with its foreign policy.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the term of each and every presidency, both the President and his staff make several crucial decisions regarding the the United States and its relationship with other nations. On the surface, such decisions may seem simple to make. However, this is not so. Many variables must be taken into account before each accord. Currently, several conflicts exist, ultimately which will need to be dealt with by President Obama and his administration in the coming months. Some notable issues include Afghan security talks, Iranian negotiations, and drone use.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The progressive era of American history encompassed the presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt, Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson. Each president had their own way of dealing with foreign policy. America was entering into a time when it was desirable to participate in and influence world affairs.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays