Preview

Does the implementation of ‘Socialism with Chinese Characteristics’ for the post 1978 China really change the Chinese lifestyle and consumption behavior?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does the implementation of ‘Socialism with Chinese Characteristics’ for the post 1978 China really change the Chinese lifestyle and consumption behavior?
In the 18th National CPC Congress, the general secretary Hu JinTao (2012) had said: “We should place high importance on systemic building, give full play to the strength of the socialist political systems... However, we will never copy a Western political system.” “Taking the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics means we must… take economic development as the central task... and the policy of reform and opening up. It means we must release and develop the productive forces, develop the socialist market economy…The system of theories of socialism with Chinese characteristics is a system of scientific theories that includes Deng Xiaoping Theory…”

Socialism with Chinese characteristics is to introduce capitalism into China’s economic reform, so that China can rises the GDP and improve living standard of Chinese people. However, according to party theorists, the introduction and existence of private ownership does not mean the existence of capitalism in China. (Robert, 1992, p.65)

Under CCP’s interpretation, socialism also has same meaning with ‘socialist political system’ and has presented socialism in terms of economic targets. (Mackerras et al., 1998)Thus, it implies that the political reform made under the socialist system is helping the implementation of socialist economy in China.

After the reform and opening-up policy had been advocated in the 11th CCP Congress, Deng had insisted “socialism must destroy poverty… The superiority of socialism lies in the gradual development of productive forces and the gradual amelioration of people’s material and cultural life.” (Lam, 1987, p.16)

By the 13th National Congress, the theory of ‘initial stage of socialism’ had been presented, in which the first point of the theory is must preserve socialist society so that China can have a socialist economic system, with the public ownership of the means of production. Secondly is China’s socialism is necessarily in the ‘initial’ stage only. It is necessary for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    China’s reform is a 2 stage process, with the first stage spanning form 1978 to 1993 and the second stage spanning from 1994 to the present day. While the reform has be ongoing for nearly 35 years, the bulk of major events occurred in the earlier stages. China kept it’s basic institutional framework but dramatically changed resource allocation and the relationship between government and business. With a change in resource distribution, the nations GDP, and living standards all dramatically improved. Qian and Wu (2000) say that:…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mao Zedong Dbq

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. A) According to source A, Mao Zedong along with the Party Central Committee were able to efficiently construct a socialist system in China, within a very short period of time. Mao and the PCC were able to analyze the economy of China and develop a system called the Great Leap Forward, which would fix the problems that they had discovered. That system quickly transformed China into a self-sufficient country, which were able to function under a socialist system.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How accurate is it to say that the communist governments social and agricultural reforms brought wide spread benefits to the Chinese people in the years 1949-57?…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The CCP or Chinese Communist Party was the only party in power from 1933 till now. Its views and policies have, in many aspects led china to become an economical super power in only a matter of years whereas it took many other western countries centuries to become as industrial as china has become in less than 100 years. Many youths living in a Chinese city may say that Mao and the CCP are heroes and extremely beneficial for the county as they have brought prosperity and peace to the county, through things like political stability, Industrial change, Land Reform and Unification. But many older people in the countryside may remember the horrors of Mao’s policy and how much destruction it brought upon the people. For example if we look at negative events during the rule of the CCP than we may start to question whether the social and economical success of china today was worth the deaths of nearly 40,000,000 Women Children and Men which we saw during Mao’s Great Leap forward.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open competition and privately owned property are the key elements of , whereas, public ownership by the government and the elimination of competition to the state are key elements of . a. b. c. d. 2. That the U.S. capitalistic economy limits some areas of competition, and China’s socialist economy allows some free enterprise, indicates that a. b. c. d. 3. capitalism does not work. socialism does not work.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over the superior socioeconomic system has gone on for over 100 years, and there seems to never be any consensus. In fact, the debate has become so heated that wars have been fought in order to prove supremacy—i.e. the Cold War fought primarily between the USA and the USSR. On one end of this debate lies the communist party that’s goal is to eliminate the gap between the rich and the poor by creating social and economic equality between classes. The opposing party is the capitalists, who strive to for free market economy and individual enterprise. Socialism is the middle ground as it is a mix of both private corporations and government run facilities.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socialism is the means of all aspects of the economy and owned and is regulated by the community. The founder of this theory, Karl Marx, is usually associated with Communism. While Socialism is considered a lower stage of communism, it is actually the middle of the economic systems (Capitalism, Communism, and Socialism). Communism has more of an underlying political effect, whereas Socialism and Communism do not. By Socialism controlling the means of production, this diminishes the idea or private businesses.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socialism is a political and economic social organization that the means of exchange, production and distribution should be owned by the community. Socialism is a collective ownership by all the people of the factories, mines, railroads and all other instruments of production. Direct control and management of the industries and services by the workers through a democratic government based on their economic organization. All authority will originate from the workers. This congress will plan and coordinate in all areas of the economy.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capitalism versus Socialism Capitalism: a term to denote an economic system that has helped build up the United States to be the superpower that it is today. Capitalism is an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are not controlled by the state, but by private owners for profit. This political economy came into prominence in the nineteenth century and continues to be practiced every day. Although the United States follows a capitalist structure, there are plenty of socialists that live their lives promoting socialism. Socialism is an economic and political theory of social organization that advocates means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Communist Manifesto is an important historical document written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles. It’s a political pamphlet advocating for the implementation of communism and the cessation of capitalism. The authors believe that a communist government will help lower the wage gap between classes, lifting families out of subsistence living and ensuring that the wealthier classes pay a fair amount of taxes. Although communism has proven to be detrimental to our society, this pamphlet still has relevance today, can be used to analyze capitalism as a system, and should not be denounced to the “Trash Heap” of history.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communist Manifesto

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848 is noted as one of the most influential political documents in the world. The publication of the book earned Marx the reputation of a prominent sociologist and political theorist. Despite his renown, there are many controversies concerning the ideas and concepts of communism formulated in the papers that are still heatedly debated even today. Marx opened the book with, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (p.4). He scrutinized the class differences and social inequality between the Proletariats and Bourgeoisies, two terms he coined to represent social classes that do not own the means of production and social classes that do own the means of production respectively. Since The Communist Manifesto was produced in an era of great social distress, it was the result of Marx’s desire to eliminate the gap between the two classes in order to ameliorate the social, political, and economic conditions of the Proletarians. To achieve equality, Marx encouraged the Proletarians to conspire against the Bourgeoisies to end the exploitation of lower social classes and set up a communistic society where class distinction is a leap of imagination. However, his ideal required changes that a society cannot successfully adapt to and do not ultimately provide equality. Marx’s theories were established upon only class stratification and ignored the many other factors that contribute to the foundation of a society. The entire list of demands that outlines the rules and regulations of communism do not fundamentally offer fairness. Communism disrupts the whole social exchange system which will eventually corrupt the economy of a society. Thus, the theories introduced in The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx are not relevant in modern industrialized societies primarily because they focus only on the issue of class…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of history of humanity, many civilizations have thrived, failed, and disappeared. All governments have contemplated and searched ages for the ideal form of the economic system, to provide the most secure, the most stable, and the most consistent lifestyle for the citizens. All economic systems can be largely separated into two categories. One, socialism, the other, capitalism. Socialism is frequently associated with “communism,” a form of economy where the government is centralized within the economy.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    China Social Structure

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This essay will focus in on and look at contemporary China’s social stratification and social class make up and structure during the post reform era, (post 1978) and what affects it has on today’s social make up. It will outline the different class’s that make up contemporary China’s social structure and give a detailed outlook and perspective on each class, and show what change they have undergone since the opening of China’s economy in the late 1970’s and introduction to a market based economy. The greatest outcome will see how the transfer of the class’s from a socialist dictated economy and society during the Mao era, rapidly changed and fused into the modern market based economy of today’s China. This essay should also indict who has benefited most from such a quick and bold move to a market economy, and those who have lost out and not been so lucky as others due to the open door policy of China which was introduced in 1978, by then Chinese Premier Deng Xiao Ping (邓小平). This essay will take each class individually and contrast them to other class’s, both those that existed during the Maoist era of pre-1978 and the class’s that have emerged as a result of the economic reforms pursued by China since the opening of its economy and internal reforms where introduced. Lastly it will look at if China’s communist party has steered away from the founding ethics of a socialist economy to that of a capitalist one due to social class division and what effect this can have on China in the near distant future.…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Labour Party Socialism

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    During this period, the definition of socialism has changed along with the changing face of society (Clore, 2008). In order to avoid confusion whilst answering this paper’s title question, a traditional definition is offered thus, socialism…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The more than 80 million-member Communist Party of China (CPC) continues to dominate government. In periods of relative liberalization, the influence of people and organizations outside the formal party structure has tended to increase, particularly in the economic realm. Under the command economy system, every state owned enterprise was required to have a party committee. The introduction of the market economy means that economic institutions now exist in which the party has limited or no power.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics