Preview

Does The Concept Of De-Individuation Explain Group Behavior?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1080 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does The Concept Of De-Individuation Explain Group Behavior?
Annie Stevenson
Foundations of Social Psychology
9th October 2014

To what extent, if any, does the concept of de-individuation explain group behaviour?

Group behaviour is inevitably a challenging element of social psychology to be explained. Although many theories and ideas exist surrounding group behaviour, the focus of this particular essay will be to explain the behaviour of groups through the concept of de-individuation. According to Diener in ‘The Psychology of Group influence’ (edited by Paul B Paulus) “A deindividuated person is prevented by situational factors in a group from becoming self aware. Deindividuated persons are blocked from awareness of themselves as separate individuals and from managing their own behaviour”. This definition
…show more content…
Each group arrived at one of a number of homes where an experimenter was waiting. In this research, three proposed antecedents to deindividuation were manipulated. These included anonymity, group presence and altered responsibility. The anonymity manipulation included either identifying each child by asking their name and where they live or leaving them anonymous. The group presence antecedent was simply whether the children arrived at the house alone or in a naturally occurring group. Finally, the altered responsibility was manipulated by appointing the smallest child as the group leader (as they had the least influence). This child was to be responsible for the whole groups actions. In the house, a bowl of candy and a bowl of money were laid out on the table. The children were instructed to take one candy only. This was termed the ‘Stated norm” and de-individuation was measured by how many times this norm was exceeded in each condition (e.g. taking more candy or taking money from the …show more content…
The first key finding that Diener et al (1976) noted was that across all of the anonymous/altered responsibility conditions, the norms being exceeded, (taking extra candy or money or both) were

However, as with any psychological research, there are always criticisms to be noted. Diener et al (1976) state, “The groups were self selected”. As the children arrived in possible friendship groups or with relatives, this could have a significant effect on de-individuation. Diener et al specifically noted this as a problem in the altered responsibility condition as if a friend or relative was appointed the role of group leader, the others may have resisted the urge to display antisocial behaviour in fear of getting their leader ‘into trouble’.

Another important point to make is that Diener et al (1976) appreciate that the manipulated variables (Anonymity, group presence and altered responsibility) may depend on each other. For example, they suggest that, “A loss of self awareness may occur because of group presence and anonymity”. This theory implies that the actual cause of de-individuation is still uncertain, a clear indication for further research. However, it is evident that Diener et al (1976) take the viewpoint that the group is responsible for de-individuation rather than the individual, constructing a clear argument for the concept of de-individuation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The intent of this paper is to discuss the dynamics of a group of coworkers and peers form the perspective of social psychology. The group will be analyzed in relation to the formation of norms, roles, hierarchy, potential groupthink, and any communication patterns as observed.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group display in humans has been studied by a variety of psychologists both classic and contemporary. Psychologists such as Le Bon believe that crowd behaviour is explained through the individual taking on the ‘psychology’ of the crowd’. Essentially, the actions of a crowd can be explained through situational factors, such as convergence in one location, or the result of normless situations where people look to others to see how to act when norms of behaviour are unavailable.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As we grow we will have many social identities which influence the groups we belong to. These groups can range from friends to family and further out to groups like nationality and ethnicity. Within these groups we have different roles to play which influence our behaviour.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    deindividuation include being in a large crowd, anonymity due to wearing a uniform and altered consciousness due to drugs or alcohol. Deindividuation leads to reduced inner restraints and therefore an increase in behaviours that are usually inhibited and also reduces the fear of negative evaluation from others. This leads to an increase in aggressive behaviours. Recent changes to this theory focus on the importance of private self-awareness rather than public self-awareness. Prentice-Dunn and Rogers suggested that being in a crowd makes people less self-focused, so less able to regulate their behaviour according to their internalised attitudes and moral standards.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is PSY 301 Week 5 Final Paper Social Psychology Bringing It All Together in this pack…

    • 632 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand, Zimbardo’s theory of Deindividuation suggests that aggressive behaviour occurs in groups as a person’s normal constraints become weakened…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deindividuation theory is a social psychological explanation of aggression. It explains how rational individuals can become aggressive hooligans in a mob or crowd as it suggests that losing their sense of identity and self awareness deindividuates people. Individuals in groups fail to see the consequences of their actions, and the social norms they would normally follow are forgotten and this is when aggressive behaviour occurs. Deindividuation causes people unquestioningly to follow group norms instead of personal norms and sometimes these group norms lead to aggression. According to Zimbardo, in a crowd we feel anonymous and unaccountable and thus are less concerned about negative evaluations by…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bioethics In Concussion

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To do what is “right” even when others try to convince you to turn a blind eye, that exemplifies what it means to be an ethical person. In the film Concussion, neuropathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu is forced to choose between speaking for the dead and being professionally destroyed by a multibillion dollar organization. While there is no bioethics genre within filmography, Concussion depicts issues of bioethics concern. The purpose of this essay is to present main themes raised within the film, determine which issues within these themes contain bioethical questions and describe the features that make these issues aspects of bioethics concern.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The value of the study in relation to social psychology was the demonstration on how social roles can have a negative effect on a person’s behavior. It showed that putting an individual in a bad situation can potentially change their behavior or basic personal characteristic. I opened the path to further examining how situations individuals are placed in can drastically their behavior. The experiment showed that with random assignment, the social class of individuals before the experiment did not matter. It also showed that when told to do what is necessary to maintain order in the makeshift prison, the guards took actions that they probably would never have done in their life. It showed how easily people can change in order to maintain control and authority.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deindividuation - loss of sense of individual identity, loss of public and private self awareness e.g football crowds…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This in turn leads to impulsive and deviant behaviour and a less concern over negative evaluation from others. Being anonymous in a crowd has the psychological consequence of reducing restraints and increasing behaviours that are usually inhibited. Prentice- Dunn and Rogers (1982) suggested that an increase in aggressive behaviour following deindividuation might be caused by the reduced privacy rather than public self- awareness, i.e. becoming less self-aware rather than being anonymous to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The effects groups of people can have an impact on behaviour because when we are in group we may act differently in order for us to be accepted within the group, but deep down we may feel that we are not ourselves and therefore we ignore our own beliefs. From this we can either take away with us positive or negative behaviours. This was demonstrated by Solomon Asch, he was a social psychologist in the 1950s. He mainly studied majority influence. This is basically when groups of…

    • 2895 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the principle of functional antagonism introduced by Turner (1985), members will tend to de-emphasize their unique qualities to integrate to the group. Members who align themselves to the group’s attitudes, behavior and perceptions usually undergo a change in order to sign on to group…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CHAPTER 7: Social Control Theory 1. Explain what social control theory. 2. Discuss the four social bonds that Hirschi posited that promote socialization and conformity. 3. Explain Matza’s concept of drift. 4. Compare and contrast the inner and outer containment mechanisms as set forth in Reckless’ containment theory. 5. Explain the evolving forms and roles of social control in developmental theory.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been suggested that de-individualisation theories can explain the link between anonymity and unacceptable behaviour online. Social Identity Theory of De-individuation (SIDE) is a social psychological theory that is concerned with the behaviour of individuals lost amidst crowds. The essence of the theory is that inner restraints are lost when people are no longer seen or considered as individuals. Philip Zimbardo’s research showed that people were more likely to administer a stronger electric shock when they were hooded and therefore unknown.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays