Preview

Does Morality Depend On Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Morality Depend On Religion
When it comes to religion everyone believes in different things or either have some of the same views. Over time older theories have changed a little or some people believe theories are outdated . Theories in my opinion depend on how you was raised and what your family believes in. Each author in the readings in morality in religion state their opinion on the topic of both morality and religion. The authors use Plato's and Socrates dialogue to get their views across. and how they feel about natural law and divine command theory which deals with religion.
In Rachel’s Does Morality Depend on Religion? In many traditions one being Christianity, God is the the one who makes the laws and has made rules for Christians to go by. Rachel’s explains the divine command theory central features as “It is right if God commands it, wrong if God forbids it”. Euthyphro dilemma is discussed in dialogue between
…show more content…
Aquinas states how The Natural Law is based on the structure of reality that God created things for specific reasons with a purpose in mind. The church's argument for the claim about artificial birth control that it impedes God’s plan for for sex because, if you are taking birth control and having sex it is denying how God is the giver of life and you are not allowing God to be a giver of life if you are taking birth control (Class notes, Module 03, Pg 9). I do think procreation and unity are the only legitimate reason for sexual intercourse, however many people believe having sexual intercourse for many other reasons. Rachel’s argues that the theory of natural law is open to two serious objections. The two objections summarized are, between what “is” the case and what ought to be the case this is also called naturalistic fallacy and the last objection is that the theory rests on an outdated view of science (Class notes, Module 03, Pg

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    This response to the Euthyphro dilemma seems like an atypical response from Christians on the basis that Christians would reject the first option as they do not believe God’s power is an arbitrary function of morality. And rejects the second option as they believe that God is almighty and omniscient and there is no greater power.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Euthyphro dilemma, Socrates questions how Euthyphro can be so certain of what actions are considered pious. Socrates asks Euthyphro the important question if “Gods love piety because it is pious, or is it pious because they love it?” (Timmons 27) Put simply, are God’s commands right because God commanded them or did God command them because they are right? In what follows, I will explain what unrestricted divine command theory tries to accomplish, why Euthyphro’s dilemma poses a few significant problems to its views, and I will argue how embracing a restricted version of divine command theory can help avoid the obstacles the dilemma sets in place.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the “Divine Commands” by Robert M. Adams responds to this dilemma. The theory teaches that moral truth or piety does not exist independently from god and that morality is determined by divine commands, which are gods commands. Therefore what ever god commands is moral because god is all good and good comes from god. This theory assert that gods command is the only reason that a good action is moral. In essence this answers Euthyphro's dilemma in figuring…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    religious ethics can be rigid for moral decision making because if some one has an absolutist approach that means they will only have done answer for a situation there are in for example euthanasia the person might want to die because of the pain they are in and absolutist approach will see that as murder and nothing else, some people will have a relativist approach witch means they think about a decision and all the consequences that factor in to it as well for example, euthanasia my seem right with the person that has the revisits approach. this can link in with situation ethics because you need to use reason based on the christian principle of love to help you make one decision in a situation, which is saying the moral right thing to do in a situation is the most loving witch can be seen as quite rigid because it might be the most loving but is it the right thing to do, in situation ethics choosing the most loving decision may be right or wrong but does it think about the consequences it may hold, because in teleological ethics the morally right or wrong thing to do is based on the consequences therefor it makes moral decision making less rigid because you have to think of the consequences it may have first before making the decision which helps with the impact of that decision because it will have good consequences instead of bad one but you that might only be because you have made morally wrong decision but it has good consequences.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a few different flaws within James Rachels’, “God and Morality Are Incompatible”. Rachels is speaking outside of his own knowledge range when he asserts, “to apply the tittle ‘God’ to a being is to recognize him as one to be obeyed” (Rachels 372). Now, this would usually be a true statement as Rachels brings up the word “’King’” (Rachels 372). A king is a great being and is obeyed by all without question, just like a dictator. This would be an example of the God that Rachels is talking about in the previous statement. Many others would see the Christian God as…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in the Divine Command Theory (DCT) of Moral Wrongness, an act is wrong if and only if it violates a command of God. However, there are many oppositions to this theory, the most famous being the Euthyphro problem. The Euthyphro problem is known as a dilemma argument, meaning the structure is set up as follows; either God’s commands are arbitrary or God’s commands are based simply on his knowledge of right and wrong. This dilemma argument is formulated in such a way that if you believe either statement and its following conclusion to be true, the DCT is then inherently false. For example, if the former is true, then God has no moral authority and if the latter is true, morality is independent of God, both cases dispelling the theory.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter four the issue of whether or not morality is dependant upon religion is analysed with respect to many different religious theories regarding morality. The chapter begins by acknowledging that there is a presumed connection between morality and religion. In the case of Judge Roy Moore, an advocate for religion and morality correlational relationship, he asserted that God’s law was as prevalent as the state’s law in his courtroom. Moore was sued multiple times for violating the separation of church and state but each time the people overwhelmingly supported his actions. As a resident of Alabama, Moore had the luxury of a conservative christian voter majority to place him back in power each time he was relieved of his office. With 92% of Americans claiming that they believe in God Moore is not in the minority in his belief that religion is a central part of religion however, there are many issues with the claim that what is moral is religious or Godly.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Morality, in a descriptive sense, refers to the values, norms and code of conducts that determine right or wrong. Wrong doings are considered to be morally wrong. Evil is known to cause harm and can be triggered by anger or irascibility. Religion and morality are closely intertwined and inseparable. Majority of people who believe in God are likely to have respect and concern people than those who do not. Those who have no religious philosophy usually have different moral viewpoints. Morality does not require religion but religion requires morality. Morality can stand alone without the influence of religion and still have good…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    APOL 104 Worldview

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. The question of morality -What is meant by right and wrong? The Christian worldview cites that morality is derived from the person of God. Specifically God provided mankind with law to establish a baseline for morality (Exodus 20). Morality was not left for man to determine, but was established by God. Mankind has rejected God’s law of morality and so this is in need of salvation from God’s judgment (Romans 3:23)…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthyphro’s third definition has placed itself in a very serious position against the thought that morality somehow dependent upon God which reflects on the…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apol 104 Worldview

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Question of Morality is, what is right or wrong based upon God’s scripture in the biblical worldview? Psalm 4, tells us “lift up the light of your countenance upon us, Lord” implying that what is good and bad will be impressed upon us. Genesis 3, shares with us Adam’s poor moral behavior of eating the forbidden fruit.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Worldview Assignment

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. The Question of Morality- Globally Christian views acknowledge man’s shortcoming and the need for morality and forgiveness in Romans 3:23. Our morality is based on the principle given in John 13:34 when Jesus teaches that we should love one another. The concept of loving one another as Jesus loved us in his willingness to bear the burden of the sin of the world and all that there in lives.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every people have their own beliefs, rules to follow. Examples of those rules are the 10 commandments which created by God and the golden rule who’s came from Confucius. For many people, the terms "morality" and "religion" are vaguely related yet distinctly different ideas. Morality, we like to say, pertains to an individual's conduct and his or her relationships with other people. Morality involves relationships between human beings. Morality is concerned with conduct in the here and now. Religion involves the relationship between human beings and God, or transcendent reality. Religion is concerned with how conduct in the here and now will influence one's standing in the here after. Whereas a "religious" person believes in an afterlife, a "moral" person need not believe there is anything after death except bodily decay. And as a Christian I do believe in God’s words, God’s existing, but as a person who has morality I’ll choose the golden rule.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When something is serving it's purpose it is right, when it is defecting from that purpose it is wrong…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Theory

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Divine Command Theory Religion and ethics are seen to be somehow inseparable in our culture. Religious leaders are usually appealed to in some capacity when dealing with various moral and political problems. Their opinions are given great weight because they are thought to be in some kind of special relationship with God that the common person does not have. The view that God creates the moral law is often called the Divine Command Theory. According to this view, what makes an action right is that God desires it to be done. The divine command theory is the idea that moral actions are those which correspond to God's will. The simplest and most common form of the Divine Command Theory states that the phrase morally right actually means commanded by God. Similarly, morally wrong means forbidden by God. Accepted, this explanation of Divine Command Theory does not consume all possible expressions, but it is the simple is used to introduce the theory and it is its common form. A slightly more sophisticated form of the Divine Command Theory would be that something is right if and only if God commands it, and this form should be kept in mind. However, if goodness is not an essential property of God, then there is no guarantee that what he wills will be good. Even if God is all-powerful and all knowing, it does not follow that he is all-good. One can be powerful and intelligent without being good. Thus, the Divine Command Theory faces a dilemma: if goodness is a defining attribute of God, the theory is circular, but if it is not a defining distinction, the theory is false. In either case, the Divine Command Theory cannot be considered a potential theory of morality. The preceding considerations indicate that it is unreasonable to believe that an action is right because God wills it to be done. One can probably believe that God wills an action to be done because it is right, but to believe this is to believe that the rightness of an action is independent of God. In any…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays