Preview

Does Being An American Mean To Be An American Or A Nonconformist?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Being An American Mean To Be An American Or A Nonconformist?
Lastly, being an American mean to be a nonconformist with a rational mind. Basically this means, people should not be conformed to what they have, and always think of improving their life. constantly, rational people start emerging in the enlightenment because a lot of people need to improve their life. Furthermore, there was a nonconformist and with a great rational mind that change the path of early America; additionally, he was an nonconformist with a great rational thinking mind his name was Martin Luther king jr. king was a African American that live in the segregation of the early state of American being judged by his color and not being equal like the rest of the people, he decides to start the civil right movement to make a difference …show more content…
he was a brilliant, rational thinker, he uses his speech and his non violence skill to prove that he was fighting for all the people that were mistreated using the law. According to king’s letter when he was in jail, he wrote “ One may well ask, ‘ How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?’ The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just and there are unjust laws”(245-246). In other word King is trying to say how people is going to follow the laws, if the person responsible insuring the law does not follow the law himself, and he says there is two types of law the just and the unjust. The just law follows the moral law of God this means being equal and have the same right and the unjust law is corrupt because it take the right of the minority people. We wasn't conform with people who was ruling America so he decide to change the American system to only follow the just law, so he starts using his rational mind to make this happen. In conclusion, King would say the meaning of being an American is to be a nonconformist with a rational thinking mind and use your knowledge to prove a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King views emphasizes the points of all these great people. First, let’s take Plato for instance, Plato teaches people to doubt and ask questions in order to justify the claim. If there are no concrete evidence then there is a reason to doubt. Also if there is one reason to doubt a claim, then it can be doubted as a whole too. Therefore with that said, king at some point in the “Letter from Birmingham jail” says that he was disappointed when the leaders of the church said that freedom will definitely come at some point eventually. Meaning they really did not take their bible studies as they should, in the bible there is no type of racial segregation. Therefore no believing man or woman should be part of an injustice. However, the church members should be the ones that doubt the laws of the nation, if they are true believers. That is the disappointment King spoke about. The he said he hope that one day there will be true…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King said that before anyone takes direct action, the protester first needs to “purify” (567) their soul so that he or she will have no regrets going forward. Taking direct action is the right path but, it needs to be understood that there will be consequences for those actions. Taking a stand has never been easy and can be extremely difficult, but for the future progress of the African American, it was necessary. The protester needed to possess a firm moral conviction that their cause was a righteous and just cause. By combining nonviolent resistance, direct action, and a firm conviction of their cause, King was confident that the oppressors would come to join him in the quest for equality. All other issues would fade away and the only thing left to see would be the true issue, a "good versus evil"…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King, however, didn’t advocate citizens transcending the law, but rather, Dr. King believed that in order to remedy injustice in society, people must openly break the unjust law and accept punishment in showing “highest respect for the law”(King p.23). In a rather interesting yet extreme example, King relates civil disobedience to the Holocaust: “It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws”(King p.23). King cites such an example to bring out the visceral reaction of the audience, given the Holocaust’s widespread negative publicity and condemnation. Thus, King manipulates the reader’s emotions to bring them on board with the idea of civil disobedience. No one would dare question the rectitude of aiding a helpless Jew. King attempts direct the same negative connotation of the Holocaust to segregation in the U.S. to fight injustice in…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King was influenced by the works of Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau. He studied his work while at Morehouse, and was impressed with his concept of civil disobedience (McElrath & Andrews, 2007). King was intrigued by the possibilities of Thoreau’s method. Thoreau stated that it was better to “break the law than to participate in the injustice toward another person” (McElrath & Andrews, 2007).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King states that he broke the law because he believed that “one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” as stated in paragraph 12. King later adds that “any law that degrades human personality is unjust.” The laws that King protested were just that; they separated and degraded all African-Americans. While I cannot relate directly to this, I can imagine the anger sparked in all of the African-Americans. They knew the term “separate but equal” was a flat-out lie to make the white people feel better about themselves. I believe King and his followers had every right to be angry and disobey the laws posed against…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King states the ways the protests were handled emphasizing the unfairness of the monitoring. For example, he mentions the angry violent dogs that aggressively bite and attack six unarmed, nonviolent negroes. Secondly, the claim that the supposedly “break” such laws is emphasized by King claiming the reasons for this action. He declares that there are two types of laws. The ones that should be followed and the ones that are to morally wrong that they should not be followed; the just laws and the unjust laws. the segregation laws, for example, are unjust laws.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the peak of the Civil Rights Movement, King had already been arrested numerous times, along with his supporters. Many government officials, including the President John F. Kennedy, either did not know what to do with him, or resented him for disrupting the hierarchy that America had worked so hard to achieve. One source of opposition came from a letter sent from the eight clergymen of Alabama. The letter stated how much they did not want King to come to Alabama because he would cause social unrest among the people. It states in the letter, “We are confronted by a series of demonstrations by some of our Negro citizens, directed and led in part by outsiders…. We believe this kind of facing of our issues can best be accomplished by citizens of our own metropolitan area” meaning that the Clergymen believed that King had no right to interfere with their business because he was not from the area. They go on further to say that his peaceful demonstrations can result in violence and hatred. King replied to this letter in his “from Letter from Birmingham Jail”. In this he says, “Actually we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive.” This shows that King disagreed with their idea that peaceful demonstrations brought unrest but rather a light for humanity. He goes onto say “In your statement you assert that our actions, even though peaceful, must be condemned because they precipitate violence. But is this a logical assertion? Isn’t this like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act of robbery?” Which makes their argument…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King uses syntax when he scribes his thoughts about just and unjust laws. In particular, he describes unjust laws as codes that are out of harmony with the moral law and not rooted with eternal law, and a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey, but does not make it binding on itself. Since he describes a just law as a man-made code that squares with the moral law or law of God and uplifts human personality, Dr. King is saying that a just law is much more preferable to our society (742). After telling about the difference between just and unjust laws, he explains to his audience, in his opinion, a way to break unjust laws. One way to do this is to bring awareness to the law and how it is unjust without breaking the law. Also a group of people can stand up against the unjust law by talking before a group of legislators or some form of court. He also tells us that some laws may be both just and unjust. He writes “Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application” (743). Laws like no parading without a permit, seems like a just law on the outside, but also tends to include peaceful protesting and boycotting. Another example is the inability to vote or segregation of schools and public places. Although African Americans have been affected by multiple unjust and just laws, they continued on their journey to gain equal rights in…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King calls upon the African American with phrases like, “Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred” to emphasize the fact that he understands how simple it is to be filled with “bitterness” and “hatred.” Also, he doesn’t want others to suffer from hatred and be sucked in with the non-supporters of the civil rights. Another viewpoint is he doesn’t want people to take the shorter road out to get freedom. He wants both blacks and whites to be able to hold hands together and greet each other without malevolence and…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To be an American is to have freedom to do or to believe whatever you want. America itself was founded on the principle of religious freedom, and that still stands today. The "melting pot" of cultures and beliefs from all around the world create a new culture in itself, one that makes America and Americans unique. Every American can write and publish any opinions they feel need sharing. Information, and the wide and unrestricted access of it, make Americans who we…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From his letter, I agree with Kings’ argument and ideas in civil disobedience, as a method to eradicate injustice. He elaborates his point of view on the issues that matter most to the community at large. Kings philosophy entails to having a common ground for peace among the diverse races in our current society, and freedom of speech, in order to express ourselves without fear of prosecution. King’s memorable quote, Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere, shows the significance of having the same level of authority everywhere, for the sake of equality. King actions made everyone realize the need of having fair treatment without discrimination, and abolishing racism which was, and is still challenge to the minorities. Since the goal of philosophy is autonomy, individuals have the freedom to decide on themselves on what they believe in and use their own reasoning to act and do the right thing that would benefit the society at large. This enables a society to choose what is right for the majority and no to benefit the people in…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chicago Gun Policy

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    More importantly, how would he respond? King is synonymous with the idea that we should only judge people by the context of their character, not by the color of their skin, people always fall victim to stereotyping whether on purpose or not certain events eventually shape someone’s perspective on a certain topic. For example, if someone would go to Chicago knowing the situation it’s experiencing, people would think before going there as they would associate Chicago as gang territory. As a response to this stereotype, King would use a line from his paper titled “Facing The Challenge Of A New Age “ saying the following:” "Freedom and Justice through Love." Not through violence; not through hate; no, not even through boycotts; but through love. It is true that as we struggle for freedom in America we will have to boycott at times. But we must remember as we boycott that a boycott is not an end in itself; it is merely a means to awaken a sense of shame within the oppressor ”(33). What King is implying in this passage is that history shows multiple times that many a path to a more prosperous land, we must follow the original goal of gaining peace and freedom for the community with acts of love and compassion rather than alienating ourselves from such a goal by inciting acts violence that only deters progress. In terms of today’s society, King’s approach may seem futile, as the…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also their personal views are considered contradicting issues. When Marx introduce the Marxism idea it was aim to improve human society and to challenge Capitalism. Therefore, Marxists and Capitalists went into numerous conflicts one of the example would be the Chinese revolution. (Harkin par. 9) Also King and his people gain no civil rights with all the non violence protest, because of the unjust laws. In the Letter From a Birmingham Jail King states: “An unjust law is a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself.”(King par. 18) Despite the fact that King in his letter point the unnecessary of unjust law, the government still ignores the issue and continuous to practice unjust laws. In result, King and the government officials have some major…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think to be an American it means that you were born in the United States( or if your parents are American) and if you were born in a different country but your parents are Americans and you come back to live here then you're an American too. If you're an immigrant and you have went through the whole legal process not just sneak across the any of the American boarders.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part three: The author defines exactly what it means to be an American. According to his definition an American is a European or a descendent of an European. Therefore, America is the only place in the world where a person may have parents and grandparents all from different cultural backgrounds. The author then goes on to say that an American is one who has given up the old for the new and is motivated by hard work and opportunity to improve his…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays