Preview

Does Alexander Deserve The Title The Great?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
961 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Alexander Deserve The Title The Great?
After Alexander the great died, he was given the title "the great" due to his success in conquering Europe. People thought he made many great to change Europe. Was that really the reason he was given the title the great? What goals do you have to achieve in order you can receive the tile of "the great"? Someone great should be a leader that contributed to the society greatly and made a significant achievement to change the world and make the way we live today better. He should be someone who is respected by others and also pays respect to others. One should be also kind hearted. Alexander did succeed those goals therefore, should not receive the title "the great".

What makes Alexander great? He had conquered all the civilizations that were
…show more content…
An example of an achievement will be establishing an empire and find the best way to improve it which was what Herod the great did to earn his title. He initiated construction at Jerusalem, Jericho, and Caesarea of theaters, amphitheaters, and hippodromes . Alexander's actions may have made significant changes to the world back then and today, but his goals were not too different from Hitler's which was to conquer the world. Hitler today was not respected by anyone and definitely not today. Although he killed many people in a much more cruel way than Alexander, but their purpose was similar, to dominate land. It is not worth the lives he had killed. It was not only the army of who he was fighting against that was killed and injured, more than half of Alexander's army died at the journey through the desert of Gedrosia. No one considers a murderer "great". Alexander sympathizes for those people that he killed? It does not mention anywhere that Alexander did anything in memory those people and not even his own people that were killed. Many people say it was because of him uniting all those cities that initiated development in Europe. It is true that after the unification, economical and cultural development did boast. Alexander should

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In history its not just about the great things that were achieved and what was accomplished, its also about who did it and why.?.. Throughout history several wars were fought, one well known leader who fought these wars was Alexander The “Great” Even though Alexander had achieved a lot in his life as a leader did he deserve the “Great” at the end of his name.? To be great as a person and as a leader it means to be Honorable, Brave, Ambitious and Virtuous. Did he have those qualities of being great.? Was he a good enough leader?…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander had done many “great” things throughout his lifetime. But behind all of that, he was a vicious, cruel, soulless and murderous villain. He was a greedy, horrible leader. Alexander the Great was not great at all; he was a voracious and hardhearted less than a human being. He did a great deal of things that would be frowned upon today. For example, Alexander slaughtered innocent and holy men. He also treated his troops with disrespect and disregard. Furthermore, he was a reckless and negligent typical military leader.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great was a powerful and wise military leader. His knowledge of the battle field led him to many victories; yet many of his battles ended very bloody for both sides. However, he did this for the good of his people and empire. Alexander the Great is the “great” king and military leader that many people perceive him as because he is wise, merciful, and willing to learn about different cultures.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greatness is an umbrella term that can hold several different meanings and interpretations. In the case of Alexander the Great, it has a very specific meaning that reflects upon the achievements and success of his life time, despite the many character flaws and failings he undoubtedly possessed. Alexander the Great definitely deserves this appellation for three main reasons. Firstly, he conquered an incredibly vast area for his young age and lack of experience; secondly he left his mark on society which has lasted till contemporary day; and thirdly he completely revolutionized military techniques and styles.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great was a hero because he did great things for many people. Alexander the Great built new cities where others had been destroyed (You Decide, pg 181). This statement shows how he tried to do good for society. Alexander wanted people to have homes and live a happy and healthy life. People liked Alexander and what he did. Making sure the lives of people were satisfied was a feeling that he felt was right. This shows how he did great things for many people. Another example of this is with his great leadership skills, he and his army won the war against the Persian Empire (Teacher Created Materials, pg 133). Because he was a good leader he defeated the Persian Empire and this helped the Macedonians. He defeated them and now the…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question: What do you think was the single greatest accomplishment of Alexander and why? Does he deserve the appellation of "Great?" Why or why not?…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was a king and conqueror. He is commonly referred to as “the most powerful leader of all time.” What is it that makes him such a powerful leader? What has he accomplished that has made him so significant? Were his accomplishments positive or negative? These are all questions that when combined as one create a debate that has been going on for decades. There are those who admire Alexander’s military achievements and ability to carve out the largest empire the world has seen. Then there are those who perceive him as a selfish, cruel madman with drinking problems. This paper will outline the different sides taken on Alexander and the question as to what his significance/influence was and whether it was good or bad.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His country was in danger and he felt threatened to take action. He gained power by uniting his country which is a key factor that distinguishes him from Alexander III. With an already united country and several tactics in place, Alexander seemed to have all of the hard work already done for him. Even though Philip lost several battles and did not expand his sieges outside Greece, he is still considered a great warrior and leader. What made him great wasn 't the amount of land he conquered; it wasn 't a never lose personality and record; it was the effect he had on his nation and the unification of his people. How can you not admire someone who brought a nation of farmers and sheep herders and turned them into one of the most dangerous and successful militia in the entire world in only two decades? (5). Without these developments, Alexander 's crusades and accomplishments would not have been…

    • 2377 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In our past, we have had many leaders. Some were better than others, but what must a leader do to acquire the label “great”? Of course, one could simply go by the definition of the word and deem the leader “above average”. Did the great ones of ancient times exceed these standards or were they just above average like a standard dictionary would have us believe. Let us focus on two “great” leaders of our past by the names of Alexander and Cyrus. Both of these kings were famous for the way they ran their empires but were they both, so called, great?…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that Alexander the Great,was a villain when his dad was alive,but when his dad died he became a hero.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Does Alexander the Great Deserve the Title? Alexander the Great, King of Macedon, deserves the title because he was a very powerful man who conquered throughout his life. One of his greatest accomplishments was he spread the Greek culture and language throughout many parts of the world. He took on the position of the King after his father passed away and was able to also accomplish the expansion of his father's empire.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be quite honest before this lesson I had always held the assumption that Alexander The Great was similar to that of Caesar; mainly in the sense that he was a general who gained power through conquest. Yet, to my surprise, I now know that Alexander was infact the son of a king, Phillip the second. Knowing this, I now view this discussion question a bit differently. There is no doubt that Alexander The Great was infact an influence character in history, but I wager his father deserves more credit than what common history gives him. The empire Alexander created both militarily and politically would, in my opinion, never occurred with the earlier conquest, and alliances his father set up. Simply put, the military and resources Alexander needed to begin his trek across the known world to the Greeks would have never happened without the alliances with the other powers Philip the second secured through political married and then latter conquest. Alexander very well could have amassed a military through the ways his father did, but the point is he did not have to do that in the beginning. Naturally, he would recruit new members to the military with ever conquest, but I believe saying this to answer a question on how Alexander created his empire’s army would be trival. However, the question itself is dually worded. The empire's military, as least for the beginning part of its creation would have been allotted to Alexander through what his father archived.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recently, in class, we have been learning about Alexander the great, specifically whether he was a villain, or a hero. I lean more towards the side of villain to most, except for Macedon, because the land was all for them. He could be thought of as a villain because he enslaved 30,000 and killed 6,000 in Thebes, attempted to force all people into one culture and strip them of their own, and he also treated those who tried to escape horrendously.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you set your mind to something than anything could happen. Alexander the great was a very accomplished person. He is remembered by many people still to this day. A lot of people today tend to give up on things when they become difficult and challenging. I think this quote written by Alexander shows that he doesn’t want people to be giving up on themselves because times get hard, he wanted people to try their very hardest and by doing that they can overcome anything that they wanted or needed to overcome…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays