Preview

Document Based Questions: Hamilton Vs. Jefferson

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1015 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Document Based Questions: Hamilton Vs. Jefferson
Document Based Question: Hamilton v. Jefferson The argument that ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists might have ended many years ago, but their philosophical ideals shaped the foundation of our beliefs as a country. These beliefs can be whittled down to two men named Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Both men fought assertively for a government based on their ideas, believing that their respective ideals would create an outstanding government. Hamilton, like the Federalists, valued a stronger national government, opposite of that which Jefferson believed in. Hamilton also spent many years of his life advocating for the Constitution and for federalism. He even favored the creation of a national bank that would control the U.S. currency, …show more content…
Alexander Hamilton was in favor of a strong national government that was able to run under a very flexible Constitution. Thomas Jefferson was quite the opposite, believing that a government should be limited and that it should be run by the people of the country. With this weak and limited government proposed by the Anti-Federalists, came a very strict interpretation of the Constitution. What Hamilton and the Federalists wanted was a system of checks and balances that equally spread power between three branches of government, which they believed protected the rights of the people. “By so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places (DOC. G).” This excerpt from NO. 51 of the Federalist Papers discusses the support of checks and balances and the separation of powers, all part of the idea of federalism. Hamilton argued that this system would ensure that the government would not be able to abuse the rights of the people and each branch would be able to control the others. This also can be seen in James Madison’s writings under the alias

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton thought that having one single president was the most ideal way to govern a nation. He believed that if you had a strong executive branch that kept the president in line that the problem of a dictatorship would never be a problem. Hamilton then discusses how to keep a strong executive by keeping its members united and supportive of each other so they keep their efficiency and control. Hamilton supported his ideas with roman history and how they tried to kept things in order with only one leader, he just made minor corrections to the flaws in their system. Hamilton also gave reasons why the government would fail with two leaders just like it did in Rome. In conclusion the federalist #70 discussed that one leader was the way Hamilton thought would make a strong united government that worked together and runs smoothly.…

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government can be a complicated system to understand, but one thing I have come to notice is it either you are for something or you are against something. One that is known to many is either the Federalist or the Anti-Federalist. To be considered a Federalist, they want a strong national government and were all for the approval of the Constitution to aid the debt and tensions. To be consider an Anti- Federalist, they were people who opposed a strong federal government and were for the Article of Confederation instead. They preferred for the power to remain in the state and local governments. Some major points of disagreement between the Federalist and Antifederalist visions of the United States were central government and important documents.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, had disparate visions about how the country should be administered, which would cause a complication with our founding fathers, who formulated a way to run the country. Federalists assumed to have a forceful central government, central bank. Federalists presumed that in a government, checks and balance works out, so there is no tension between individuals. With Federalists, they remained with the strong central governments, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted to remain with the British government. In the Anti- Federalists, they always thought that the army would cause great destruction. Centinel No 1, states that "The Congress may construe every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes,…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one side of the political party was Alexander Hamilton, who led a group known as the Federalist. The Federalists were a group who were willing to stretch the Constitution by interpretation. They supported a strong government, and were made up of mostly an elite class. Hamilton became the spokesperson for this elite group - which consisted mainly of bankers, traders, and manufactures. He believed in a strong nation with a profitable economy based on trade and agriculture. According to him, the major flaw of the U.S. Constitution was the inability to raise money. He also thought that only the wealthy and educated individuals should have a say in government. He felt the lower class society was foolish, uneducated, and incapable of making decisions affecting the government.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prolonging the life of the young country required contributions from both founding fathers. Despite an undying possibility of the federal government becoming far too powerful Hamilton’s ideas by themselves would of done far better than Jefferson’s. Hamilton’s want for industrial power and a much stronger central authority derived from his experiences during revolutionary wartime. Hamilton saw then, the extent the country would be able to function without a source of revenue and with very limited congressional power. Jefferson’s attempts to enact laws to allow states to maintain their former rights, and his support of agriculture in the U.S. created a successful balance as his ideas contradicted Hamilton’s. However if themselves had put Jefferson’s plans into action, an extremely weak government would have led to further great crises potentially leading to the destruction of the young nation.…

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton understood that a strong central government would be needed to keep the fledgling country alive. In order to keep a strong government that understood the problems at hand, it needed to be run by first class, educated men. Hamilton also makes a good point in saying that, though Jeffersonians thought the rich would corrupt the government in order to profit for themselves, the rich had nothing to gain as they were already at the top of the social ladder. Whiele Hamilton was a realist, Jefferson was a romantic. He lagged…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although they were very different, Hamilton and Jefferson shared a few similarities. They both had the same views for the new American country: a free country ran by its own people, as well as, restoring the national debt. They saw that America needed a government to lead the country, but disagreed on where the power should be located. Hamilton believed in a strong central government as Jefferson wanted the states to have all the power. The complication of national…

    • 646 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson’s differences in social philosophy over the interpretation of the Constitution and the establishment of a national bank…

    • 1350 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton, as a Federalist, believed primarily in a strong central government run mainly by upper-class citizens and the commerce of the nation. He characterized the general public as "selfish, unreasonable, and violent." He idealized that the federal government should encourage the development of American industries. Hamilton proposed a plan to manage the countries debts and to establish a national banking system. Hamilton also proposed to pay off the foreign…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian, Lieutenant- colonel, First U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of State and spent his time devoted to the rich and wealthy individuals of Virginia. Though I have little knowledge on today’s congress, senate, and military. What I do remember is that what we have in common with Hamilton is,” Strong central government, order and organization, Industrial development, Helped establish a financial credit for the U.S. government. Hamilton had a firm belief that the rich, powerful and well educated should have the control on the government. Which in all honesty looking at today modern times, I can fully agree that the much upper class controlling the government, why? To be blunt money talks in future and I’m sure during 1780s and 90s it did as well, the rich and well educated people would rather spend his or her tax money on what they believe is right each upper class individual have a grasp on politics. Hamilton’s strong belief is still going strong today and being applied through the Senate Congress…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton played a role in the constitutional convention. He wrote 51 out of 85 Federalist paper. His main problem was the national debt. Were he thought the government assume on the entire debt in the federal government and states. The speculators bought bond from the Revolutionary War veterans for 10 or 15 cents in dollars. He also debt a program that was remarkable to success. Hamilton economic vision was most closely predicted. By the way , Hamilton believed that the common people usually act foolishly. He believed the rich should be educated. Also the people that should be rule are the wellborn.Hamilton also wanted to raise the voting qualification higher. Hamilton established a national bank but wanted to maintain the internal taxes. He believed that the American could be a model on the British system. Hamilton will support the lost of…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was feared that a weak nation could easily be swept up by grasping foreign power stating, “A nation despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral. (No.11, Page 51) This is one of the reason why the federalist would conduct a better central government that would be strong. Not like the Article of Confederation. Some antifederalist had argued that America could not be governed by a single republican government because it was too big to handle by one. James Madison responded, “It is, than in a democracy the people meet and exercise the government in person. In a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents. A democracy, consequently must be confined to a small spot. A republic may extend over a large region.” This statement was to make the democracy confused and make them take decisions on public matter to be decided on by elected…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to Hamilton and Jefferson disagreeing on who should govern the country, they disputed on the structure of the actual government itself. The structure of the government played a role in the formation of political parties. Hamilton favored a strong central government and thought that the American government should be modeled on the British system. In addition, he wanted to increase the number of federal employees and happened to support a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Lastly, he thought that individual liberties, such as freedom of speech, should sometimes be restricted. Of course Jefferson thought extremely differently about it. He favored a weak central government, but strong state governments. He preferred a more democratic government. He wanted to reduce the number of federal employees and favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Also, he believed that laws, rather than being restricted must protect individual liberties. The structure of government was clearly another part as to why political parties were…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalism- Alexander Hamilton wanted to form a strong union with the states and federal government. He sought an increase in the power/control of the federal government over the individual states. Hamilton also wanted a bank of the State so that loans could be put out to manufacturers and commercial enterprises. He felt like it was necessary to create a large national debt so that the government's credit would be built up over time. Finally, he wanted to place/raise tariffs on foreign goods to promote American manufacturing and the affordability of the products.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays