Do you agree: Australian media representatives of Asian society are biased? Give reasons by way of examples.
Mired in debt in Europe together with North America being under the background of weak economic recovery, the Australian government would link the future development and boom of Asia closely and it is undoubtedly wise and far-sighted. In fact, the "look Asian" and "embrace" in Asian policy had been proposed by politicians decades ago. As the financial turmoil sweeps the world, Australia finally realized that Asia is the best ally for its future. Melbourne's newspaper the Age had done a survey, asking which career were the most worthy of trust and which careers were the most untrustworthy. The result was that the most trusted professionals were doctors, nurses, colleges and universities and primary and secondary school teachers, while the least trusted was media (newspapers, radio and television journalist), real estate developers, and car dealers. The reason was very simple, the media is similar with merchandising, and they thrive only on the basis of money. Since Australian education commercialized, international relations were an integral part of Australian educational institutions. It is of no exaggeration to say that, if there were no education internationalization with tens of thousands of overseas students to pay the high tuition fees, Australian universities would have shut down at least one-third. Although overseas students has been supporting the preserver of Australian higher education institutions since the middle 20th century, and even led to important dynamic development of Australian cities’ real estate and retail industry. However, these overseas students, especially students from Asia are always looked upon with prejudice. The media is always full of negative reports about international students, and international students in Australia suffered from unfair treatment from the mass media (Thomas, 2000). For example, a few years ago, a researcher in Monash University’s education institute published that, a mainland China’s student’s knowledge of English is very poor. Australia's state-funded broadcaster ABC was also interested in some mainland Chinese students whose English were very poor and advertised them on television and radio. Media even deliberately found some students grades as an example, suggesting that these Chinese students robbed from Australia their places in the field of higher education. In terms of international relations, the few Australian media negative roles, especially in year 2009, were the tipping point of the relations in the diplomatic history of two countries. A well-known separatist and a business queen, Rebiya Kadeer, was once part of the many Uygurs who were based in Xinjiang, China. The Uyghurs were under the Chinese communist rule for over six decades and Rebiya was the voice for the Uyghurs, and fought against China for her people’s human rights, gaining the reputation of a terrorist. Rebiya Kadeer was a very bold and influential figure during late 19th century. The Chinese government once put pressure on Australia's national press club in Canberra, getting them to cancel the broadcast to the nation, a speech by the Uyghur leader Rebiya Kadeer which was scheduled on August 11, 2009. But the club refused the request and Rebiya Kadeer’s speech was televised as per scheduled. This media release further contributed to the tense relationship between Australia and China. Australian radio and television media still continued with the attention on Rebiya Kadeer. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation website had even put the news of Rebiya Kadeer arriving in Australia on international headlines. On contrast, The Australian published that Rebiya Kadeer’s visit to Australia at this time would aggravate the existent friction between the two countries, Australia and China. This tension was further demonstrated by the decline of many Chinese mainland business investments, and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document