Preview

Do the Wealthy Have an Obligation to Help the Poor?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do the Wealthy Have an Obligation to Help the Poor?
We live in a world of 6 billion people. Unfortunately about thirteen percent of them are defined as lower class. Whereas one percent is considered upper class. Should one percent of the population be responsible for thirteen percent? The answer is no, the wealthy should not have to be responsible for the poor.
The wealthy should not be obligated to help the poor because they, in most cases, have earned what they received. The poor don’t deserve to live in the conditions they do, but it is all about opportunities. The wealthy took advantage of their opportunities and got a lot out of it. The poor cannot expect the wealthy to give them a certain percentage of their income because they will become dependent on that money. Therefore the poor just need to apply themselves, and they won’t need the help of the wealthy. The government should show the poor that they can make money themselves, and that way they will be able to become independent. Although in a different perspective, the wealthy have the opportunity to reach out to the poor. It is their decision though, because their money is rightfully theirs.
There is no reason for the wealthy to be obliged to help the poor. The wealthy should only help the poor if they feel compelled to do so. It is not a law that they must do so, rather a social obligation and even with that they do not have to. We need to show the poor how to help themselves, rather than being dependent on other people in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Recently with the Presidential election campaign, a lot was said about the difference between the middle class and the rich. Especially with the tax cuts issue where tax cuts are being wanted for the middle class and the wealthy shall not be given any cuts. Any household that is earning anything more than $1 million per year should not be paying lesser income tax than what a middle class family does.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I am not saying that giving to the less fortunate is wrong or those who are at disadvantages because of uncontrollable circumstances should not be given an opportunity to help themselves, I am stating my beliefs that the so-called “Great Society” has not been effective in the reduction of poverty and in many cases may actually be contributing to the continuance of people living in poverty.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I like many people believe that the people of wealthy nations have a moral responsibility to help poor nations. When I was doing some research on this subject, I learned some people have said that all people have a moral responsibility to help people in harm’s way and when doing so would not cause harm to them. And as a person I do know that suffering and death from starvation are both considered harmful things. I do also see that it is very clear that small financial sacrifices on the part of people from wealthy nations can prevent massive amounts of suffering and death from starvation just by helping in small ways. So from my point of view and research I do now believe that people in a wealthy nation have at least some moral responsibility to help poor nations. I also see that Singers argument does add up with my research so I do agree with Singers argument as well.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealth inequality is also a major issue between the rich and the poor. Wealth is “the value of assets owned by an individual of family at a point in time. (Gilbert, 277). Even though the rich do pay taxes, it doesn’t affect them as bad as the poor. They are still able to live comfortably because of the property that they owned. These properties are sometimes inherited and passed down to them. Not only that, but it is most likely that they also have some sort of savings or safety net to maintain their lifestyle in case anything should happen. The poor on the other hand, even though they have to pay taxes as well, this can affect them drastically. Simply because majority of the time they do not own much. They do not own any property,…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For as long as humans have lived on this earth, we have found a need to help other humans that are less fortunate than us. From the reign of Augustus in the Roman Empire, to today’s controversial welfare policies in the United States, history has recorded the charitable actions of society to provide for those that cannot provide for themselves. The United States has always practiced some sort of welfare policy since the beginning of colonial times. When the colonists migrated to the future United States from England, they brought with them a set of welfare policies known as the British Poor Laws. Under these laws, citizens who had health problems that prevented work were given cash or alternative forms of assistance from the government. Citizens who were healthy but out of work were given public service work. Today those “poor laws”…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economic Justice for All

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * From an economic standpoint, do you feel all members of society have a special obligation to the poor and weak?…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are the Rich Necessary

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Others believe that the rich are essential to our economy. The economy needs rich people because they have wealth. As the economy expand, the rich needs to save profit to invest on capital goods to adjust to the increase in poverty. Why is the poor and middle class living in subsistence and can’t save? They may have money saved up for retirement, and college fund for their children; however they have many immediate needs and desires, in this case will eventually deplete their funds. Unlike the poor, the rich’s income is greater than their expense even they splurge in luxuries therefore forced to save. It is know in history that the…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Working Stereotypes

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the book ‘America’s Poor and the Great Recession’ by Kristin S. Seefeldt and John D. Graham, the reasoning that in a post-recession world, having two sections of an extreme poor and an extreme rich are becoming commonplace. The book talked about how the recession was just a reaction to how much power the 1% are getting, and how their recklessness caused an economic crisis America hadn’t seen since the 1930’s. In conclusion, the authors came to the answer that not only is becoming easier to fall into the hole of poverty, it’s becoming harder to climb out, and all because of the higher-ups. It may be because the middle class are afraid to fall into the hole of poverty themselves, and the myth makes them more comfortable, knowing that they are not “lazy”, or “undereducated”. The upper class, on the other hand, might be trying to deflect the blame. “It’s not OUR fault!”, they…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many townspeople felt that it was their responsibility as a citizen to care for the poor in their town. For example, a town council in France felt responsible for the “poor begging creatures” and “poor children” in the town, and they respond by renting out a barn at the city’s cost to house and care for the poor. (Doc 2) This shows how the towns felt that it was their duty to care for their poor. Also, Juan Luis Vives, a humanist, felt that the poor, in their deprived situations of begging, stealing, and wandering, are driven to that by necessity of self care. He feels that there is a duty to help the poor, however many people do not act on that duty because they are overwhelmed by the immense number, they uncertain where to put their money, or they just don’t perform the duties commanded of them. (Doc 3) This shows the feeling of responsibility to help the poor that the people had, and also the responses they had to this feeling. Another account of a town council’s meeting says that those poor who are simply unable to find work are deserving of assistance from the city, but those who are idle are…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rich not spread their wealth to help others for the positive? Poverty is a sad, harsh, and heartbreaking issue in America. If the wealthy would help in any possible way, the world would become a better place little by little. How come our country is so quick to try and aid other countries when we could focus on our first? America is viewed by other countries as relatively close to a utopian society, but is it…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A lot of people have different ideas of how our nation will succeed. One big idea that people continue to argue about is how our economy should be played out. It's either a good idea to give to the poor to make things fair, or keep your money to yourselves, or maybe it's a good idea to put a cap on the population so we don't have to give to the poor. I believe that we shouldn’t give to the poor because they will use our givings in a negative way, which would make us regret doing goods. Some people such as William Hogarth support the idea of not giving to the poor because they will use their money on something that they shouldn't be. William Hogarth painted a picture which was called "Gin Lane" to support his ideas. Some people such as Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin think that the population is too high to maintain a well kept economy.…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his ground-breaking essay on the effects of wealth and poverty on global society, Peter Singer juxtaposes the responsibility of the wealthy toward the less fortunate. Singer starts off by giving contrasting examples to the abject and severe poverty of third world countries and examples of the richer nations of the world. It is Singer’s assumption that the richer nations have a duty to help the poorer nations to develop into self sufficient societies. Singer goes on toe assert, that with the right assistance and the right guidance that even those on the lower levels of the economic totem pole can rise out of poverty. The gap between rich and poor is seen on an everyday basis on a local level, but becomes more pronounced as the richer nations are compared to the poorer ones. One of the prime examples of how the more advanced nations tend to have different values that the poorer ones is how the British government spent millions of dollars on developing supersonic transport but spent very little to assist third world countries in feeding refugees and the victims of natural disasters.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prosperous people are the changemakers and bridge the gap between the haves and have nots. Yet these people should be careful how much and who they are giving their money to. Lower income citizens tend to take advantage of money simply gifted to them. Spending money on things that will not help the poor prosper, is an ostentatious quality known as conspicuous consumption. The gap between the rich and poor is large today because of conspicuous consumption. Superfluous purchases do not help the economy and create an unhealthy impression of status. Carnegie believed that the wealthy should focus on is building opportunities for the poor so they are able to pull themselves up economically and improve themselves. Funding should aid the crafting of public amenities such as public libraries, colleges, culture, art, and public works. To raise their standard of living would help grow the industrial economy to help those who don’t have property. Andrew Carnegie lived the example of his theories by building Carnegie Hall and supporting education with his wealth. Carnegie’s idea is not realistic today because our economy would collapse, yet it’s still worth considering giving to the unfortunate to give others quality education and…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the essay “The Gospel of Wealth” Andrew Carnegie says that the rich should invest their money to do good for the public (396). He argues that the rich should do something with their money instead of put it to waste when they die. Many people tend to not enjoy their money; they save until one day they realize it is too late. Carnegie believes that this money should be put into good instead of waste. One way that Carnegie mentions that the rich should do is charity. He used the example of a free public library in New York City to support his argument. A public library helps families and children economically, and educationally. If the children get the education they need they have better opportunities and less chance of living in poverty in the near future. Carnegie tries to convince us that; if the rich invest money into improving the community then there will be a slight chance of less poverty. I agree, but it also depends on the person. Some people take advantage of the help they are getting from government or even from higher class society. Carnegie idea could work but it may also backfire and make things worse. If the poor start to rely on the rich to help them with their problems, they may not do anything about it because they know there will be someone to “bail” them out of trouble. This is a bad thing because people would not want to start making effort to start doing better. A great example in America today is unemployment. Today the citizens receive unemployment money if they are layed or fired. Carnegie might say many people take advantage of…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Rich Are Different from You and Me,” author Chrystia Freeland explains the rising phenomenon of income inequality that is occurring between the richest top 10% and bottom 90% of the population. Chrystia Freeland states “In every society, some people are richer than others, but across time and geography, the gap between the rich and the rest has widely varied. The reality today is that the rich-especially the very, very rich- are vaulting ahead of everyone else” (51). Between the years of 2002 and 2007, income statistics show that the gap between the richest 10% and the bottom 90% of the population had significantly increased. Statistics also show that by 2007, approximately 35% of the wealth was maintained by the top 10%, leaving about 27% of wealth to the bottom 90% of the population. This is about an 8% gap in between. The last time income inequality was this high was in the 1920’s, but back then only 20% of wealth was gained from work. Today the top 10% gains at least 60% of their wealth from work, rather than inheritance. As economies throughout the world mature, income inequality will continue to rise. The gap between the rich and all others is primarily found in United States. Other countries such as Canada, China, and the United Kingdom are beginning to see income inequality as well. Freeland also states that “These global super- rich work and play together” (52). They share common interests such as business traveling, and vacationing around the world. Due to the common interests shared by others most like themselves, they have become separated from all others within the population, and have formed their own world governed by plutocracy. Author Chrystia Freeland is concerned that because the rich are so caught up in their world of wealth that they will not recognize that other…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays