It is evident throughout both novels that the characters live in a life of poverty. Growing up Jeannette and her family were very poor and often found themselves jumping from place to place. “Later that night, Dad stopped the car out in the middle of the desert, and we slept under the stars. We had no pillows…”(Walls 18). This shows the poverty stricken life that the family lives, and the sacrifices that they have to make. Similarly, Sonny Hickam also finds himself living in a poverty filled mine town. “All around me, Coalwood was always busily playing its industrial symphony of rumbling coal cars, spouting locomotives, the tromping of the miners going to and from the mine. How could that ever end”(Hickam, Jr. 46)? This shows how mining has impacted the town and consumed the lives of everyone in it. It is clear that poverty is a reoccurring theme in both of these novels.…
Every writer creates a unique story that takes a life of its own, and teaches us a lesson. These stories can be similar with the same themes, plots, and other characteristics however overall they are unmistakably different. The similarities and differences of, Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck and “The Scarlet Ibis” by James Hurst is the quintessential example of this.…
In “The Necklace,” a female character, Mathilde, is living in Paris during the 19th century. She is poor, yet undyingly wishes she was wealthy. One day the woman is invited to a prestigious ball within her city. She immediately she contacts a rich friend and borrows a fabulous necklace. Once the night is all said and done and she returns from the ball, she realizes that the borrowed necklace is lost. She reacts by lying about the necklace and buying her friend a new one. With her financial situation the way it is she goes spiraling into debt and never recovers. Later, once Mathilde admits to her friend that she lost and replaced the necklace, it is revealed that the borrowed necklace was a fake worth very little.…
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…
You can read “The Necklace” as a story about greed, but this is also about pride. Mathilde Loisel is a very proud woman. She feels far above the humble circumstances and she is forced to live with her husband by her common birth. Her current situation disgusts her. She is also vain too, completely caught up in her own beauty. It is pride that prevents Mathilde from admitting they've lost an expensive necklace. After the loss of the necklace makes Mathilde poor, and her beauty fades, she may learn a pride of a different sort: pride in her own work and…
It is nothing but human to want more. This essential quality is what makes people human. By striving to be better, this species has done countless extraordinary things by wanting to elevate ourselves higher than others. However, Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” shows the story of young, beautiful, 19th century housewife Mathilde Loisel aspiring to be a luxurious white collar. Even though it is human nature to want more, Mathilde ravening desire to appear as higher class blinds her of what she has and becomes her own downfall.…
Within both stories there are many differences and similarities that deal with how they handle their situations.…
In “The Necklace,” GUY DE MAUPASSANT character loisel Mathilde who is a very greedy and selfish woman, believes that she was born for every delicacy and luxury there is and feels that she was made for all beautiful jewels and clothes, which cause her emotional…
In the two short stories “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and “The Rocking Horse” by D.H. Lawrence, the authors show that the love for money is the most corruptive love of all. One’s love of money can cause one to hurt what they hold most dear, it can make you forget your love for others, and can cause your loved ones to take desperate measures in order to attain your love. These effects are shown through Hester, the female protagonist in “The Rocking Horse” and through Mathilde, the female protagonist in “The Necklace”.…
Both begin sad and then light hearted and happy then both end in some sort of dismay. Della and Mathilde are complex characters seeing that they both change from where they started. In the begging Mathilde is vain and only cares about luxury and finds her life insufficient. In the end it says "She came to know the heavy work of the house, the hateful duties of the kitchen. She washed the plates, wearing out her pink nails on the coarse pottery... She washed the dirty linen... And, clad, like a poor woman, she went to the fruiterer, to the grocer, to the butcher, a basket on her arm, haggling, insulted, fighting for every wretched halfpenny of her money" (Maupassant). She changes to working and insulted, she seems to give up the life of luxury. As for Della in the begining of the story she wanted to get her husband a present so badly and that seemed like all that mattered but in the end it looks as if she finally realized that her husband would've been happy even if she didn’t give him a present. Both stories have a very valuable message, be happy with what you have even if its not the best, at least you have…
2. Do you equate the ideas, people, or places in the story with real-life situations in our present-day society? If so, with whom and/or what?…
Themes of the book and the novel have similar ideas since poverty and wealth are both present. Rich men and poor men both have different values and outlooks on life depending on past experiences in their lifetime. The greatest wealth is to live content of…
After the party, Madame Loisel loses the necklace, resulting in tireless work, loans, and night jobs for her and her husband in order to pay back the equivalent of the price. The couple finally succeeds when all the money is paid ten years later, only for Mathilde to discover that the necklace was ironically a fake, and worth a very small percentage of what the couple paid. The theme of this story is that an overemphasis on material wealth can shrink the spirit and leave one open to the changeability of fortune. The situational irony highlights this moral because the Loisels would never have had to exhaust themselves if Madame Loisel wasn’t so obsessed with riches and wealth. From the very beginning of the story, she wastes her time dreaming of luxuries such as fine silks, beautiful furniture, and gourmet feasts. Even when she is at Madam Forestier’s house to try on necklaces to borrow, she is never satisfied until she has seen the very best. Madame Loisel’s preoccupation with appearance clouds her judgment as well. As soon as she realizes that she has lost the necklace, she should simply come clean to Madam Forestier. Instead, she is too concerned with how her reputation will be affected, so she keeps quiet. She later pays the price for this when she discovers that the necklace is “false [and]…worth five hundred francs at most.” The life that she gets instead as punishment during the ten years in debt is even more difficult and meager than her life to begin with, which stresses how fame and fortune is so fleeting and unimportant in the scheme of…
There are two environments in the story. Claire and the narrators childhood environments. Claire, who is grown up in a rich high-class society and the narrators poor and not very well trained socierty. In Claires society it is very shallowed and it is all about who you see and date, how you look and how well you are educated. The narrator is grown up in almost the opposite.…
Parts of this paper will focus on the structure of the short story, and the contrast between the two “worlds” that are represented in the story.…