Introduction …................................................................... 5-6
Background ….................................................................... 7-8
Areas of Research ……………………………………………………………. 9-12
Hypothesis ….................................................................. 13
Methodology …................................................................. 14
Primary Data presentation & Analysis ............................ 14-27
Secondary Data presentation & Analysis ............................ …show more content…
Did people really abandon this art? Or the art itself lost its touch in course of time and if the art were to re-store to its classic form, will there be people who would embrace it as they did before? People who are afraid of snakes for own personal reason, are they reluctant to this form of art? What is their perception about it? There could also be a reason for this art to lose its priority is the poor condition of the ethnic colony of snake charmers. How do people fell about them? Do they feel anything at all? If people agreed that there are still chances for this art to reconcile, then comes the question, what are the possible ways to do so? There could be multiple ways to help out these ill-treated ethnic people and their and their degrading heir-loom art. I intend to find answers to such questions through my research work. The primary data will be collected by interviewing and passing questionnaires to the general citizens of Dhaka city. To further clarify matters, I will take help from a wide range of interesting secondary sources. They mostly include the related materials published in the books, internet, newspapers, magazines, journals, reports, motion pictures and even in a song. By integrating my primary and secondary data, I hope to give conclusive evidence to support my …show more content…
Description: This graph tells us that 83% respondents are sure that better organized shows with proper modification would work as an attraction for the tourists in our country, 13% respondents do not think the same way and 4% are stuck in the middle of “yes’ & “No” which shows uncertainty.
Analysis: This particular graph is out of the topic, however it too shows the bright side containing benefits we can get by helping the snake charmers nourish their heir-loom art and from the graph we can see that majority of the respondents supports the idea as well.
Question 11: Do you think, in any possible ways it would be beneficial to the snake-charmers, if they were provided with more facilities to nurture their art?
Description: In this graph 64% respondents voted that the Government’s help can play a big role in re-inaugurating the art of snake charming, the 29% respondents do not seem to be satisfied with this thought and the rest 7 % shows