Preview

Discussion Of The Arguments Of Descartes Discourse

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
990 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discussion Of The Arguments Of Descartes Discourse
Descartes claims in his Discourse on Method that our dreams and conscious thoughts are untrue, but is this truly the case? Because of these questions of existence, it seems like, if Descartes’s arguments are taken a certain way, his arguments might be taken to imply that our lives are just a dream. Are we living in a universal soap opera directed by the Divine, and the question of who shot J.R. will never be resolved because we will all wake on Judgment Day from the dream of existence? If we are questioning existence, how can we know that our lives are just dreams? Descartes says in marginal 32 that “[…] the same thoughts we have while awake can come to us also while we are sleeping, without there being any that are then true […],” which …show more content…
But, is this idea necessarily true? Dream reading as a whole may be a finicky and unreliable undertaking, but there are plenty of instances in the Bible and the Church where dreams either directly predicted events, such as the events with Joseph in the Old Testament, or where the dreams were enlightening, such as the revelations St. Julian of Norwich, or both, in the case of the Revelations of St. John in the New Testament. Descartes says that he accepts religion, specifically Christianity, without doubt. If so, then the importance and experience of dreams cannot be part of the reason we suppose that both thought and dreams are untrue. Even if dreams are only sometimes true, by ignoring all of them, we are losing a particular way of gaining insight and truth that the Divine gave us access to, even if that insight is only into the important and effects of our waking …show more content…
But, though my dreams reflected my conscious thoughts and obsessions, they are not the same as those thoughts. My waking thoughts are more organized and deeper, so my dream about Henry V was shorter and more shallow than my nearly 25 page paper about Henry V. And I doubt that Descartes could actually write his Discourse on Method while asleep, much less think these thoughts cohesively while asleep. The higher functions of our Minds are more readily accessible when we are awake, which is why most every teacher prefers conscious students to sleeping ones. So, this idea that our conscious thoughts coming to us at night may be part of why we can trust either does not seem to carry the weight of Descartes’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes' dream argument comes off to me is that we cannot fully trust our senses especially with the difference of dreaming and being awake. Descartes did state that he could be dreaming things since he was fooled into believing he was awake in the past. This argument goes on to say that their isn't an actual way to tell if you are dreaming or if you're awake. Since from Descrates' point of view we are not sure what is real and what is an actual dream in that our senses can be easily fooled into believing whatever the mind wants us to believe.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem is that scientifically this idea is particularity hard to prove. No psychologist, machine, or doctor can see inside another person’s dreams. However, an experiment was done where subjects were instructed to signal the start of a lucid dream by certain dream actions that could be recorded on a polygraph. These actions were compared side by side to the recording of their sleep stages. Signals were shown on the polygraph mostly during REM sleep. (LaBerge, S., Nagel, L., Dement, W. C., & Zarcone, V., Jr. (1981). Lucid dreaming verified by volitional communication during REM sleep. Perceptual and Motor Skills) This data proves that the subjects were able to control their dream actions while…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a belief that all questions have a scientific or mathematical answer; Rene Descartes in his search for solutions used principles that were already known and sets out to establish specific knowledge or truths. One of his most startling revelations is outlined in his writing “Discourse on the Method IV.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes 5th Objection

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    One of the replies which for me exemplifies one of the concerns is when it states that “I'm a finite thing and that compression put some limits on god, god is infinite thus I cannot comprehend god, however this does not precent me from perceiving god” this was the reply from the 5th objection which states that If I have an idea of god I should be able to comprehend it. Also in the fourth set of objection which said that god does not need a cause and therefore god is not the case of oneself. Descartes replies to this by saying that by using the word cause he was merely making an analogy between and effect and its cause.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes and Locke both agreed that there were things in life that exist that we can be certain of. For Descartes, human experiences did not provide sufficient proof of existence. He indicated that through his Dream Conjecture and his Evil-Demon Theory (Paquette 205). Descartes stated that we cannot be certain if reality is a dream or not, thus questioning our existence (Paquette 205). In his Evil-Demon Theory, Descartes claimed that for all he knew, an evil demon could be putting thoughts into his head, making him think that reality was true when it was in fact false (Paquette 205). Ultimately, all this thinking resulted in Descartes coming to the conclusion that the one thing we could be sure of existing is the mind (Newman 2010). This can be seen through his most famous quote, “I think therefore I am (Kaplan 2008).” Descartes claimed that since he was able to doubt and think using his mind, his mind must exist (Paquette 205).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Next, he organizes his thoughts into classes of ideas, emotions, and judgments, and after questions whether they are true or false. Regarding the ideas - these are images or pictures of we see or imagine, such as a sky, chimera, God, or an angel. Then there are volitions or emotions - when we affirm, deny, or fear something, and finally other thoughts and judgments (71). Next, Descartes questioned which one of these could be false or true. The ideas are not wrong when; "they are considered alone and in their own right, without being referred to something else" (71).…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The meditator concludes that, he is certain of things he was able to doubt in Meditation I. When in doubt of things one can use intellect or memory to be certain in the world.42 Descartes also notes, our memory can dismiss any doubt we have about the Dream Argument.43 Experiences that happen why you are awake are connected through memory, where dreams happen as a disconnect. Descartes is certain God is not a deceiver, which makes him safe from error.…

    • 5433 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes False Reality

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    Dreams have been a part of humanity for decades and as technology progresses the mystery has continually been brought to attention. While science has enhanced dramatically, no true explanation of dreams has been made, there are countless theories behind the purpose and cause of dreams. Descartes was one of the many philosophers and scientists to investigate the strange world of dreams and what it reveals about the “real” world. The ambiguity and obscurity of dreams allows interesting interpretations not only from scientists but also artists. Christopher Nolan’s film Inception demonstrates Descartes' ideas of dreams being a false reality and the presence of a deceiver creating these illusions, just as the main character Cobb tricks individuals…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes's Dream Argument

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He says, “I remind myself that on many occasions I have in sleep been deceived by similar illusions,” so he seems to be relying on some knowledge to the effect that he has actually dreamt in the past and that he remembers having been “deceived” by those dreams. That is more than he actually needs for his reflections about knowledge to have the force he thinks they have. He does not need to support his judgement that he has actually dreamt in the past. The only thought he needs is that is now possible for him to be dreaming that he is sitting by the fire, and that if that possibility were realized he would not know that he is sitting by the fire. Of course it was no doubt true that Descartes had dreamt in the past and that his knowledge that he had done so was partly what he was going on in acknowledging the possibility of his dreaming on this particular occasion. But neither the fact of past dreams nor knowledge of their actual occurrence would seem to be strictly required in order to grant what Descartes relies on – the possibility of dreaming, and the absence of knowledge if that possibility were realized. (p. 17)…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dreams are something that many of us have that are vivid, and sometimes so realistic we think it was not actually a dream. How do those dreams affect the way we live our life or are they even dreams? What would Rene Descartes say about dreams? Why do we dream, and what is the significance of dreaming? On our journey to understand a little more about Rene Descartes and what he would say about dreams happening plus their significance to our life we will be going through the Dream Argument as well as some of its criticism, imagination, and the Cartesian questions about dreams.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would appear that person A would not be able to doubt they were asleep (as they would if Descartes’ assumptions were true), as one could argue that if A was asleep, A would be unconscious. In turn, this would mean that A would be unable to question whether they were actually awake or within a dream-world, as they would not be able to think clearly while in such a state of deep sleep. Malcolm remarks “Evidence that he was sound asleep would be evidence [that he was] not in any state of consciousness.” (1956, 33), which can be seen to disprove Descartes’ dream theory as it is often acknowledged that we have to be conscious in order to develop clear thoughts or…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The First Meditation written by Descartes is the introduction to all the following meditations written, with the author stating his thoughts on demolishing everything he knows and starting over, only believing only what he learns from now on. Reading his thoughts makes me feel that there is no certainty in anything that exists. I the Dream Argument, Descartes argues that there is a possibility that everything is a dream, which is something I cannot believe. If everything were a dream, I would not be able to feel with my senses. Although Descartes has evidence to support his argument, I would not be able to understand that this reality is a dream.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dream Argument

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes arguments in meditation I can be proven wrong through discrepancies and contradictions. Authors Peter Simpson and Ludwig Wittgenstein's have similar points on skepticism where they have found specific inconsistencies. When primarily looking at Descartes’ dream argument we can see a contradiction in his statements. He sets out to demonstrate the similarity between “waking” and “dreaming”. His intention was to prove that there is no difference between the two, and that we could be seeing false deceptions and or possibly hallucinating. Therefore there would be no way to prove the differences between “dreaming” and “waking”. But when looking at his arguments there are a few points that contradict his own theories.…

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays