Preview

Discussion - Companies Act - Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
841 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discussion - Companies Act - Law
Companies Act Chapter 81:01:- "No association, society, body or other group consisting of more than ten persons may be formed for the purpose of carrying on any trade or business for gain unless it is—
(a) incorporated under this Act;
(b) Formed under some other written law; or
(c) A partnership"
According to the Companies Act Chapter 81:01, a “shareholder”, in relation to a company, means a person described in section 107(1); which states that a shareholder is:
(a) a person who is a member of the company under section 349(3);
(b) The personal representative of a deceased shareholder and the trustee in bankruptcy of a bankrupt shareholder;
(c) a person in whose favour a transfer of shares has been executed and delivered but whose name has not been entered in the register of members of the company or, if two or more such transfers have been executed and delivered, the person in whose favour the most recent transfer has been made, provided that in the case of a company other than a public company in respect of the persons mentioned in paragraphs (b) and (c).
“The majority usually dictates the action of a company and the minority is usually bound by the decisions of the majority (Foss v Harbottle (1843)). Problems may arise where those in effective control of a company use their power in such a way as either to benefit themselves or to cause a detriment to the minority shareholders. In the light of such a possibility, the law has intervened to offer protection to minority shareholders. The source of the protection may be considered in three areas: * Fraud on the minority: it has long established at common law that those controlling the majority of the shares are not to be allowed to use their position of control to perpetuate what is known as a fraud on the minority. In such circumstances, the individual shareholder will be able to take legal action in order to remedy their situation (Cook v Deeks (1916)); * Just and equitable winding up; *



References: 1. Laws of Trinidad and Tobago. Ministry of Legal Affairs https://www.ttbizlink.gov.tt/trade/tnt/cmn/pdf/Companies%20Act-81.01.pdf 2. Routledge Cavendish. “Company Law” Lawcard Series, Business Law Pg 89-90. 3. Ashfords Solicitors , “Guide to Unfair Prejudice Against Shareholders” Last Modified Monday 8th February, 2010. Darte accessed:20th June, 2012 http://www.ashfords.co.uk/news/shareholders_disputes_guide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Answear

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B) The proper plaintiffs in the action are the shareholders, under the relief from oppression provision.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Case Summary

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) as well as the Turquand rule of internal management in common…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. May a director of a proprietary company that has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of a company be present at the meeting of the vote on matters that relate to the interest?…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many companies are controlled by single or a group of shareholders. This is particularly common in proprietary companies. In a majority-controlled company, minority shareholders face significant problem If the controllers run the company in their own interest or act unfairly discriminatory, unfairly prejudicial or oppressively. The Corporation Act provides effective procedures to enable members to obtain remedies in circumstances where the controllers of a company act oppressively or unfairly towards them.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to section 140, a company’s constitution is only an internal governance rule, it cannot be enforced by outsider and also cannot be used and act between a company member and an outsider (Corporation Act, 2001).…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “In spite of the obvious economic connection between companies within the same group, English company law has steadfastly maintained its policy of treating such companies as distinct legal entities.”…

    • 4700 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stakeholders of Tesco

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A shareholder is Any person, company or other institution that owns at least one share of a company’s stock. Shareholders are a company's owners.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Useless

    • 256 Words
    • 1 Page

    Shareholder Definition - An individual, group, or organization that owns one or more shares in a company, and in whose name the share certificate is issued.…

    • 256 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporations Law

    • 1502 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s124, also outlines the legal capacity and powers of a company. S 124(1) states, “ a company has the legal capacity and power of an individual both in and outside this jurisdiction”. A company can also be held primarily3 or secondarily4 accountable for torts and crimes. To think of a corporation as solely an instrument of business, fails to account for social changes, which has taken place over the past century. 5 It is therefore vital that…

    • 1502 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case App1

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    _Company members which does not offer or trade its company stock (shares) to the general public on the stock market exchanges, but rather the company's stock is offered, owned and traded or exchanged privately.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon1 affirmed the legal principle that, upon incorporation, a company is generally considered to be a new legal entity separate from its shareholders. The court did this in relation to what was essentially a one person company. Windeyer J, in the High Court in Peate v Federal Commissioner of Taxation,2 stated that a company represents:…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning stage for any thought of the position of minority shareholders is the principle in Foss v Harbottle. This principle, which has two strands, blocks a shareholder from conveying an activity to seek after wrongs which have been done to the organization. In the first place, the executives have been named to deal with the organization's undertakings and they owe their obligations to the organization; any misfeasance, allotment of corporate property or break of obligation on their part is a wrong done to the organization and, as a different lawful procedures, the organization is the correct offended party in any resulting lawful procedures. Besides, where there are inconsistencies in the way the organization is run furthermore much of the time where chiefs are in rupture on their obligations to the organization, the lion's share of shareholders by and large meeting may by normal…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A shareholder who holds a significant amount of stock in a company but still has less than 51% is a minority shareholder. While technically even a person who owns one share is a minority shareholder, the term most frequently applies to persons and companies with large stakes.1 The corporate shareholders that do not have a controlling interest in the company are known as “minority shareholders.” 2Minority rights are of course typical to common shares, but other types of corporate securities may need protection against a majority power.…

    • 6165 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As important aim of companies act is to eliminate the evils caused by large number of partnerships trading In unincorporated form. A business association consisting of a large number of members, unless incorporated as a company, leads to inevitable confusion and uncertainty concerning the rights and liabilities of members inter se and their relations with others. Its therefore, necessary to provide that every business association having a certain number of members must be registered as a company failing which it shall be regarede as an u\illegal association.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays