Preview

Discretion In The Criminal Justice System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1526 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discretion In The Criminal Justice System
Justice and Authority paper

Discretionary authority in the Criminal Justice system
Allen Ray
CJA/550
April 11th, 2011

Discussions in how discretion is exercised in the legal profession often raises debate in the criminal justice system. Discretion is vastly misused in many of the criminal justice fields. Areas such as youth justice, sentencing, policing, and a host of many other legal fields need better understanding, interpretation and communication. As with many practices, the object of measuring these areas is to understand constraints on its use and areas where it can be regulated better. This paper will reflect the role of discretion and how it is conceived in the justice system. In addition, this paper will examine how individuals elect to measure legal discretion from the public’s point of view as often the public sees only the negative terms of it.
Role of Discretion in Youth Justice
Decision-making discretion in youth justice has been the concern for many of the law officials working in the criminal justice system. Presently, personnel are examining many of the factors that police face when they have to deal with youth offenders. In the past, Police did not always follow proper
…show more content…
Rather than using informal action or recommending charges, police may choose to refer to or recommend alternative measures (Youth Justice). In many cases, law enforcers will recommend pre or post charge alternative measures dealing with youth-related incidents. The most common alternative measures programs assigned to youth are community service, an apology, social skills improvement, writing an essay, restitution or compensation, and other activities geared toward the specific young person (Kowalski, 1999). These alternative measures allow police to have some input in assessing, developing, and implementing a plan that will best monitor a youth’s compliance to the recommended

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    police as gatekeepers

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The police play an integral role as ‘gatekeepers’ to the criminal justice system. Discretion is a major factor in the criminal justice system and refers to the choice to do or not do something. The police enforce their discretion in accordance with legislation, guidelines and legal precedent. The police make decisions at every stage of the criminal justice system in relation to law enforcement and how these decisions have significant impacts on the administration of justice. Therefore it is impossible to be completely objective in the criminal justice system allowing justice to sometimes be miscarried. This essay aims to outline the positive and negative effects of police discretion and how these decisions are made from the reporting of crime, investigation and arrest phase in the criminal justice system.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice Center

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The juvenile justice system and the adult justice system share their commonalities and differences. For example, the juvenile justice system makes it the point to rehabilitate instead of punishing juvenile delinquents. However, one must take into consideration that punishment is still a feasible concept within the juvenile system, but it is used prudently as a “last resort.” In instances of punishment for a teenager who is accused of an atrocious crime, he or she may be tried as an adult (Goldstein, 2007). According to Dr. Goldstein (2007) there are some similarities between the two justice systems as he states that “the police, judiciary, and corrections have discretion relative to decision making in both systems.”…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Injuction Process

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before the modern era, youth who committed crimes in the Western world received no preferential treatment because of their age. These children were adjudicated, punished, and confined alongside adult offenders. In more recent years the juvenile justice system has maintained different priorities than those that exist in the adult criminal justice system. However, there are still many get tough advocates of law and order, many of whom are fed up with violent juvenile crime, that are increasingly questioning the philosophy that underlies the juvenile justice system in America. Many people call for harsher punishments while others call for better rehabilitation programs for youth offenders. This paper will focus on the differences between the adult and juvenile justice systems, and whether rehabilitation or incarceration is the best method to assist in reducing the juvenile crime rate and help today’s youth become contributing members of society.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of Statutory guidelines a number of acts inform the exercise of Judicial discretion. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) is the primary source of sentencing law in NSW. It sets out the purposes for which a sentence and types of penalties may be imposed, when they can be used and also recommends general guidelines in relation to sentencing. The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) prescribes the maximum sentence that may be imposed for various offences. It identifies what might constitute a mitigating or aggravating circumstance. However, it is left, to some degree, to the exercise of judicial discretion to determine the most appropriate sentence, providing it fits within the prescribed statutory guidelines. As well as this Judicial officers can be guided by former judgements in cases with similar facts. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act allows for the NSW Attorney General to apply guideline judgements, that will set out sentencing guidelines for a particular offence. These guidelines, although limiting the judicial discretion, are used to ensure the right to a fair trial, by limiting the amount cases with similar circumstances can differ in their final sentencing. Ultimately this means that, although judicial discretion is…

    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile and Adult Courts

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For over a century, states have believed that the juvenile justice system was a vehicle to protect the public by providing a system that responds to children who are maturing into adulthood. States recognize that children who commit crimes are different from adults: as a class, they are less blameworthy, and they have a greater capacity for change. To respond to these differences, states have established a separate court system for juveniles, and they have created a separate, youth-based service delivery system that is different than that provided to adults. The juvenile justice system has grown and changed substantially since 1899, when the nation’s first juvenile court was established in Illinois (James Halpin, 2010, pg30). Originally, the court process was informal—often nothing more than a conversation between the youth and the judge—and the defendant lacked legal representation. To replace confinement in jails with adults, the early juvenile courts created a probation system and used a separate service-delivery system to provide minors with supervision, guidance, and education. Soon every state and the District of Columbia had followed Illinois’s lead…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discretionary authority: The right to choose what action to take; permission to act. Each facet of the criminal justice system has its own level of discretionary authority. Whether or not each facet wants to acknowledge it, each facet eventually answers to the public. From a police officer writing a ticket or deciding to pursue a fleeing suspect to the probation/parole officer filing a violation of probation or parole – and the organizations in between – each facet must adhere to the policy and procedures for its own agency.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Juvenile Justice System is a separate world from the criminal justice system. There are laws that protect the youth of today on a level where it is exclusive to only a certain age group. There are considerations that are often brought in to sentencing for the youth that would never be considered for an adult. There are decisions that have to be made on different levels including age, culture, laws based on the juvenile system, policy and most important different situations and how to handle them. There are four ethical realms that involve the criminal justice system. The ethics that will be discussed in this team project concerning the decision made with Brian the Juvenile youth are as follows: the situation based on ethical relativism, ethical egoism, deontological ethics and teleological ethics. There is a very fine line when taking action in today’s juvenile youth system. The laws are different concerning youth; therefore, every ethical situation is different and can be detrimental to the staff and the youth involved. This situation with Brian and Daren can be considered and compared to the ethics that best fit.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many states suggest that there should be any reason to maintain a separate punitive youth courts, however, today, in almost every state, youths who are 13 or 14 years of age or less can be tried and punished as adults for a broad range of offenses; all youth offenders in one integrated criminal court to save taxpayer money. In addition, various opinion surveys have found public support generally for getting tougher on juvenile crimes. Most victims’ people agree that young…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The juvenile and adult court has similarities and differences between the two systems. The Administration of juvenile justice has dependent youths that are in families, and rehabilitation is the goal. The criminal justice system does not see rehabilitation as the primary aim. General deterrence is known to work, and sanctions are proportional to the offense. In both courts, constitutional rights are permitted, criminals are held accountable, and public safety is their primary goal (Snyder, 1999). The juvenile system has many prevention programs. The adult facilities have prevention activities aimed for deterrence. Both systems offer educational approaches for criminal behaviors. The adult system allows all access for all information by the…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults" is an essay by Laurence Steinberg, which expresses his views of if, when, and why youth offenders should be tried as adults. He compares the juvenile system to the adult system and point out hat the two differ in their respective forms of decision making for treatment or discipline. In the recent past, society has redefined the judicial system for juveniles and is striving to get more youth offenders trued and disciplined in adult jail systems (632). According to Steinberg, "[this] represents a fundamental challenge to the very premise that the juvenile court was founded on - that adolescents and adults are different (632)", and these forms of discipline are detrimental to the rehabilitation of young criminals. The author poses the question of how effective the judicial system is at determining when a child is to be tried as an adult and points out three very distinct characteristics of an adolescent individual between the ages of 12 and 17. First, he states that "there are dramatic changes in individuals' physical, intellectual, emotional, and social capabilities" between these ages (632). Secondly, he claims that between theses ages, individuals that have broken laws are still open to many positive influences that may help them abandon their criminal instincts and tendencies (632). Lastly, he points out that youth offenders who are sentenced to harsh punishments as adolescents often do not recover from the mental harm it causes because it is an important developmental time and these experiences may have lasting and disadvantageous effects on their adult behaviors (632). In a second argument, Steinberg explains that he doesn't believe that the age of a young defendant should be overlooked and, as seen earlier in the essay, uses three main points to illustrate this idea. First, he expresses that the legal system has a set of regulations and customs which differs from the individualistic and informal setting of a juvenile court…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to the criminal process, it typically ends when a defendant is found not guilty. However, in retrospect, it does not end whenever a defendant is found guilty, and that is for three primary reasons: 1) the accused must be sentenced; 2) the accused can and often does appeal their conviction; and 3) in the event that the accused’s appeal fails to succeed, the U.S. Constitution provides for them the right to habeas corpus, which is a method of challenging the constitutionality of one’s confinement (Worrall, 2010). However, for the basis of this article, the focus will be placed on issues relating to generalized sentencing as well as the impact of the controversial subject of sentencing guidelines.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although based on the adult criminal justice system, the juvenile justice process works differently. Juveniles can end up in court by way of arrest, truancy or for curfew violations or running away. A youth may also be referred to the juvenile court system by school officials or a parent or guardian for being continuously disobedient. The juvenile justice process involves several different steps including intake, detention, adjudication, disposition and aftercare following release from a juvenile correctional facility. In this paper we will breakdown the numerous steps involved in the juvenile justice process as well as compared some processes to the adult justice process (terminology).…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Discretion

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will be writing about Police Discretion. I will start by defining Police Discretion then briefly discuss the use in domestic disturbances, minor misdemeanors, and traffic enforcement. I will also discuss the application of police discretion, the provisions it uses and how it is currently practiced. At the end of these brief descriptions, I will then present the myth that exists in regards to police discretion. And finally, I will end this paper with my personal opinion as well as a brief conclusion.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meaning of Discretion

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By definition, discretion means freedom to act or judge on ones own. With this privilege, evolves both pros and cons. A major problem which may occur are inconsistencies with the law. The same type of crimes may be given different punishments by judges. This would create controversy and accusations of prejudice and bias would certainly evolve. If the law were emphasized on discretion, the power would be mainly in judges and government official’s hands. It would be their responsibility that our nation continues to follow the principles of democracy and equality. If this did not occur, discretion could end up marking the downfall of our great nation. However I believe the pros overrun the cons in when looking closely at our legal system, in regards to discretion. In too many cases in our nations recent history, has discretion helped in making the right decisions. Every crime has different scenarios and plotlines, making it impossible for the same punishment to fit all the same kinds of crimes. This is why that in our legal system now, murder has evolved into manslaughter and other types of crimes. I believe that the best legal system looks at every case as a separate entity, and is run by judges that have no bias and do not look at any other factors besides, what is true justice. Our country will continue to evolve if we continue to use the component of discretion in our legal system.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics