Tar sands are a combination of clay, sand, water, and bitumen. As a type of unconventional petroleum deposit, tar sands are found in many places worldwide, the largest deposits are found in Alberta, Canada. The Alberta tar sand deposits contain more than 70.8% of the world 's reserves of natural bitumen which representing 40% of the world’s combined extra-heavy crude oil and crude bitumen reserves. It is the only bitumen deposits that are economically recoverable for conversion to synthetic crude oil at the price range of $25-$35 per barrel. Although substantial amount of the world 's oil is in the form of tar sands, it is not all recoverable. Study shows that the world’s total natural bitumen reserves are estimated at 249.67 billion barrels, Canada maintains 176.8 billion barrels. Northern Alberta’s 173 billion barrels of recoverable bitumen requires intensive processing to convert to synthetic crude oil. However, there are serious social, economical and environmental consequences in the tar sands development. By grading the Alberta tar sands development on each of the six measures of Enlightened Sustainability Policy, this report will provide a detailed evaluation of the overall sustainability of the Alberta tar sands development.…
C. Preview of Main Points: The massive-scale extraction of "black oil," underway for years now, seeks to suck out the remaining 170 billion barrels beneath the Boreal forest, of which huge swaths are destroyed to get to the oil underneath. Massive quantities of freshwater are used to "steam out" the viscous petrol from the tar-like sands. The Process turns the earth into toxic sludge and gives off vast amount of C02…
The construction of the Keystone Xl pipeline will be detrimental to the environment because it will disperse greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the extraction of tar sand. The tar sands oil production has higher levels of carbon dioxide emissions than that of conventional oil. Burning the tar sand oil will increase the earth temperature, resulting in powerful storms such as hurricanes and tornadoes. This kind of pollution will have detrimental effects on our eco system, from potential oil spill or even worse a catastrophic explosion. The release of harmful toxins into earth environment can increase health risks for nature’s inhabitants.…
1.Read "Alberta's Oil Sands: Perspectives on Environmental Impacts" on page 275 and answer the following questions: (2 points each)…
Imagine a forest with unnatural beauty: green trees, a wide variety of wildlife, clean water from streams, and the sound of migrating birds flying overhead. Now imagine that same exact forest with tar sands oil running through it: wilting trees, bone-thin wildlife suffocating from the fumes, and streams covered in brown and black oil. Jonathan Waldman, an environmental journalist at the University of Colorado, published an article that argued that the Keystone XL pipeline should be built because it is the safest way to move tar sands oil, does not affect the environment and climate, and creates effective jobs. However, that is not the case. The Keystone XL Pipeline is actually a dangerous way to move oil from Point A to Point B, affects the environment negatively, and does not create effective jobs.…
In 1608, Samuel de Champlain of France led an expedition which resulted in the founding of Quebec. The French had good relationships with Natives and the colony was funded by fur trade with the Indians. In 1663, New France was no longer managed by the Company of New France, and became directly under the rule of King Louis XIV. In order to grow the population, women were sent to the colony and men migrated to the colony as indentured servants. By 1700, New France had about 15,000 settlers.…
Although many argue that the development of the Athabasca oil sands is great for economic development, overall it is not good for our environment. In the bigger picture, the health of our environment is more…
Abstract. The topic of global oil production is becoming a well-recognized political issue, as it should, but the environmental impacts need to be addressed as well. The recent development project of the Canadian oil sands has been put into the spotlight after the TransCanada Company applied for a permit allowing their Keystone XL pipeline.…
According to the Tar Sand Blockade, NASA’s leading climate scientist, Dr. James Hansen has called the Keystone XL pipelines “a fuse to the largest carbon bomb on the planet.” Hansen has said that if all the carbon stored in the Canadian tar sands is released into the earth’s atmosphere it would mean “game over” for the planet. Global warming is caused by the amount of carbon and greenhouse gas emissions right to the atmosphere, raising the level of the sea, weather will be wild depending on where you live; hurricanes, floods, heat waves, forest fires and there will be extinction of cretin species. The dependence on fossil fuels and oil will grow, making many problems and along with animal agriculture for livestock profits there will be destruction on this planet. There are dead zones in the sea, way less trees in forests and now sanctuaries of green lands can and will be ruined. TransCanada seems to be hesitant towards what exact chemicals are going through these pipes within the oil. Not much good can come from…
Canada need to completely get rid of the use of Coal Burning Power Plants. Although coal has been known to be efficient and inexpensive there are to many drawbacks continuing use coal. Coal is very bad for the environment because it causes an immense amount of atmospheric pollution. Coal produces carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas and when it is released into the air it dramatically changes the climate. For every one tonne of coal the power plants produce it releases four tonnes of carbon dioxide. Canada has many other options to create energy and it doesn’t need coal as one of them. The releasing of carbon dioxide is the main reason for global warming so if Canada can cut it out completely Canada will be making the environment cleaner. It is not just carbon dioxide in coal that is bad for the environment. The oxidization sulphur and nitrogen can cause acid rain and lead and mercury is extremely bad for our health. The carbon is not the problem it is the burning of carbon that causes all these problems. There are solutions to the problem, but scientists are in the very early stages of finding solutions as they have not figured out how to prevent it infecting under the ground. People are trying to trap the carbon dioxide and liquify it to dispose of it properly. Since Canada is trying to be more environmentally friendly they two new coal plants they built in British Columbia is a waste of money since Canadians have projected to use 6.5 times more of wind energy then before. The increases usage of wind and nuclear energy are good things for Canada because they are environmentally friendly and don’t have many restrictions on where they can be. This is taking a step in the right direction for Canada and if they can ban the use of coal burning power plants it would be even…
Did you know Canada's energy mostly comes from Alberta's oil sands? It has been estimated that between 1.7 trillion and 2.5 trillion barrels of oil come from Alberta. The province's oil resource plays an important role for the world's oil supply. It has enough oil to keep Canada supplied for the next 400 years!…
The environmental impacts are straightforward, and thus a more obvious target for policies aiming to reduce the environmental impacts from resource use. The use of fossil fuels and global warming potential and potential acidifying effect. Use of specific metals, where there is a clear and linear relationship to environmental impacts from metal extraction and refining. A reduction in the use of these metals will lead to a direct reduction in the associated impacts. Area occupation, where it is the resource use itself that is of environmental concern. A reduction in area occupation will reduce the pressure on biodiversity. Construction materials, where the resource use drives the waste stream, albeit mostly with a significant delay…
Thirdly, the Oil Sands harm the environment. The Alberta oil sands use extraction methods that are among the most carbon-intensive; the oil is so deep in the ground that special methods are used to extract it, which causes five to 15 percent more emissions (CITATION). By causing more emissions, this contributes to global warming, which is bad for the environment and should be avoided. In conclusion, I do not think that the Alberta Oil Sands should be developed because of the negative impacts it has on health, the low supply of oil, and the harm it causes on the…
Fracking is the best process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside. People have argued for years past whether this is useful or not , whether they agree to it or disagree.Fracking is used as advanced technology but in reality it’s just slowly destroying our environment ,because it contaminates the drinking and non-drinking water , costs more than expected , and it causes geographical disasters.…
Offshore oil drilling is slowly destroying our environment. Over the past few years following the tragic oil spill in the gulf,…