Preview

Diotima

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
545 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Diotima
Throughout the course of the speech, Socrates describes love based upon an interaction with a woman named Diotima. After explaining to Socrates that good and bad and beautiful and ugly are more of a grey concept as opposed to a clear cut concept, she tells Socrates that love is a “great spirit” whose purpose is to fill the unknown space between humans and gods. Diotima then tells Socrates of the origin of Love, following Aphrodite’s birth, and how it relates to Love’s parents, the Penia, the embodiment of poverty, and Poros, the cunning and beautiful son of Metis. Additionally, she explains love as a cycle of continuous birth and death. She explains to Socrates that love is neither wise, nor ignorant which further illustrates her claim of love’s equivocalness.
After explaining love’s
…show more content…
The primary way the proposal relates to Plato’s theory involves the top step of Diotima’s “ladder.” Diotima tells Socrates “that in that life alone, when he looks at Beauty in the only way that Beauty can be seen—only then will it become possible for him to give birth not to images of virtue… but to true virtue.” Because Plato’s theory states that ethereal, metaphysical ideas hold more true to reality than their tangible counterparts, this quote accurately reflects the basis of Plato’s Theory of the Form because true beauty is far beyond a physical image one can conjure. Another way the argument relates to the theory is the concept that the form of love is eternal, which Diotima’s explores in her story of the origin of love where she says that “by nature [love is] neither immortal nor mortal.” The fact that love can enter and leave someone’s life extremely quickly, only to return years later, further illustrates love as an eternal form, with a slight contradiction. While forms may be eternal, love is a form that follows a sporadic path, only to return to those open enough to climb the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Symposium each philosopher shared a different version of love when they gave their speech. First of all, Phaedrus expressed that love was the oldest of all gods and the one that does the most to promote virtue in people. Second, the strangest speech of the night came from Aristophanes; he expressed love in the form of a mythical story. Here is a quote from part of Aristophanes speech on his version of love, “We are twice the people we are now, and the gods were jealous, Zeus decided to cut us in half to reduce our power, and ever since we had been running all over the earth trying to rejoin with our other half. When we do, we cling to that other half with all our might, and we call this love.” (Aristophanes…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Beauty is the example of a form; beauty is not something that you can encounter directly in the physical world like an object such as a tree or horse. A tree or a horse may or may not be beautiful, but beauty meets with objects. Beauty does not stand alone, but it accompanies objects in the physical world”, said Plato. “Form determines what a thing is and in combination with matter is to have a thing”, replied Aristotle. “Form is not something that can be seen, yet is something one experiences”, said Plato. Aristotle said, “One must ask the following questions: What is the thing? In other words what makes up the thing? Next one must ask what is the thing made of? What type of material does the form consist of? What made it? Or who made the form? The final question one must ask of the form is what purpose does it serve? What was the form made to do?” Plato responds, “Forms are ever changing and eternal. Beauty is beauty today; beauty is beauty tomorrow; beauty of a tree and beauty of a horse has the same meaning yet the only difference is the object”. Aristotle replies, “The different kinds of imperfect, changing beings in terms of possibility and actuality. At one extreme is matter, which consists only of possibility. Matter, must be moved because it cannot move or form itself”. Plato said, Forms are unmoving and indivisible. Indeed, what sense would it make even to suppose that they might move or be physically divided?” Aristotle argues, “Forms can be universal, and apply to different objects and have the same meaning”. Aristotle argues, “Things are known through sense experience things through reasoning.” For example, things are defined with through similarity to other things.” Plato argues, “The idea that knowledge may be equated with sense perception. Knowledge is dependent upon one’s perception of knowledge. Knowledge can be interpreted differently by individuals”.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In literary texts, Diotima, the “teacher” of Socrates in the Symposium, is often presented as a Beatrice-like figure which “inspires” creative men and guides them as a symbolic muse. However, in the immediate context of the speech of Socrates in the Symposium, Diotima was not a muse or an erotic-spiritual guide; she was a wise woman and priestess who taught Socrates the mysteries of love (Plato 31-34). The present paper calls for an adequate appreciation of Diotima’s status as a teacher, and - drawing on this - seeks to adumbrate the features of the female teacher of tomorrow who would not be “gazed” at as an erotic object by her male students, but who would, rather, teach her male students the secrets of an unaggressive Eros, thereby ridding…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato’s Phaedrus centers around the concept of the soul and its division. Plato uses the soul to describe physiological thinking and justification of all aspects of philosophy as the most noble of all ventures because of its relationship to the soul. The first speeches are on love and how best to love. The central arguments are whether or not it is best in a Paederastic to be in a relationship with someone who does or does not love you. Initially, Socrates seemed fairly skeptical of myths. However this view changed by the end of the Phaedrus. At the end he seemed willing to employ the use of any myth as long has it has some sort of truth. His change can be justified because philosophy itself contains some sort of madness or a requirement of something other than direct reasoning. Myths are meant to describe common experiences shared by a culture, whether or not they can be backed up by fact.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Symposium

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates’ describes love as the love of the body that eventually culminates into a philosophical state, in which greater wisdom and knowledge of beauty is developed. Socrates’ speech is derived from a dialogue from an “instructress in the art of love” named Diatoma. The identity of this character remains ambiguous. Is she real? What connection does she have to Socrates? Furthermore, if Diatoma is not a real person, why is Socrates’ using her as a proxy to explain his philosophy? Additionally, I found it strange that several speeches emphasized that love was at its purest when between men; however, the wisest member, Socrates, learned love from a woman. I feel this is confusing as although the feminine philosophy is advocated here, it greatly contradicts the previous notions of the lack of intellect in women. Thus, Socrates’ speech was difficult to comprehend due to his ambiguous representation of love.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato imagined that there existed an ideal or perfect world beyond our own physical earth. Our earthly world is full of unevenness, imperfections, and impurities which have been copied from the true ideal world which is beyond us. Plato further believed that our physical world and its Forms participate or imitate the real Forms in a disorderly way. He claimed that there was a relationship between the realm of Forms and our world. This relationship revealed to us mortals the forms and brought order to life.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato was from the time of approximately 400BC and stated that the human body with all its parts must owe it’s origin to a creator. Plato was a Pagan and believed in numerous Greek gods. In his work The Timaeus he suggests that a cosmic craftsman (‘the Demiurge’) may have brought together the materials of the universe to make it orderly and beautiful. Plato’s theory of forms (or ideas) lies at the heart of his philosophy. It follows on directly from his allegory of the cave and understanding reality. This theory suggests that a realm of forms exist, perfect ideals of which things in this world are but imperfect. The world that we see around us, according to this theory, is but a pale shadow of the ultimate reality. Things may appear beautiful, or just, insofar as they imitate the form of Beauty and Justice. But the imperfect and changeable world cannot capture the glory of the eternal and immutable…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Diotima’s concept of love is completely different from that of all other speakers. Unlike other speakers, Diotima associates neither positive nor negative traits with love. She simply describes love as a desire to possess and preserve good things eternally. When asked what Love wants, Diotima answers, “Reproduction and birth in beauty” (206E, 53). She further explains her reasoning by saying, “...Reproduction goes on forever; it is what mortals have in place of immortality. A lover must desire immortality along with the good, if what we agreed earlier was right, that Love wants to possess the good forever. It follows that Love must desire immortality” (206E-207A). According to this quote, one cannot possess something forever unless one is immortal. Analogous to the biological reproduction of children, the reproduction, or passing down, of an idea perpetuates the immortality of that idea. Hence, the idea of physical and mental reproduction comes into play. Diotima’s concepts of love thus indirectly build on Pausanias’ ideas of heavenly and commonly love. Commonly love refers to pregnancy in the physical body. More significantly, heavenly love refers to pregnancy in mind, which passes down intellectual…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato’s Theory of Forms

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Everything which exist in this world and all things that we see around us are not as they appear to us” this is the core idea behind plato’s theory of forms.From this idea only he moves towards explaining his world of forms or ideas.…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Plato's Symposium, a dinner party was held with the discussion of love as the focus. Everyone who attended the party gave a speech, an ode to Love. Socrates spoke last, alleging his speech was a reiteration of what Diotima had once told him. Diotima, a priestess, whom Socrates allegedly met in the past, told him of the secrets of love. Another attendee of the party, Alcibiades, was asked to make a eulogy for love as well, but instead, talked about the nature of Socrates. The nature of love, from what Alcibiades said, and the nature of Socrates turned out to be almost identical. In Plato's Symposium, Socrates represents the quintessence of love itself.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Love In Plato's Symposium

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The philosophical point made in Socrates’ speech in Plato’s Symposium is that Love is mainly a property shared between things; that Love itself is not beautiful, good, or anything else other than relation between those who desire and the things that they perceive to be good and beautiful. In my opinion however, the more important thing that the speech, which is really more of a cross-examination does, is take Agathon’s claim to know all there is to know about Love and lead him to admit that he doesn’t really know the subject well at all. It emphasizes careful reasoning, logical thinking, the ability to accept when your assumptions are invalid, and the ability to be open to new concepts. Alcibiades’ speech most obviously serves to show that Socrates embodies the qualities of the ideal lover describes in Diotima’s speech. He seems completely detached from physical pleasures, indifferent to Alcibiades’ sexual advances, and seeks only to lead Alcibiades and others toward wisdom.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato theorised that beyond the material world there was a “realm of ideas and concepts”; he calls these the Forms. A Form can be described as the “essence” of something, the very attributes and characteristics that make something what it is. For example, in the realm of the Forms there can be found a form which outlines all that a cat should be. All cats found on earth are in fact imitating this basic form, making them dim replications of true “catness”. At a basic level, Plato’s belief was that all objects, creatures and concepts were merely copies of their true Form, and that the job of a philosopher was to break free from this world of facsimiles and shadows – and truly come to understand and embrace the realm of the Forms.…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Love In Plato's Phaedrus

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Love is an omnipresent phenomenon that has pursued humankind since the dawn of our existence. The experience of love is a sensation that can be attributed to a benevolent and infinite power. Love can be considered a form of faith due to the fact that the loved individual becomes the source of someone’s ultimate concern. In my relatively short time living in this world, love has still managed to integrate itself into many of my thoughts, and it has greatly altered my past choices and current state of being. Plato’s Phaedrus consists of a dialogue where Socrates speaks about his own viewpoint towards love, and I strongly agree with many of his opinions. Many people have attempted to explicitly define love; however, love cannot be fully understood…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A large part of those extracts on Romantic imagination - which are contained in the fascicule on pages D64 and D65 – are strictly related to an ancient theory about Art and Reality’s imitation, the Theory of Forms concieved by a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician Plato - in Greek: Πλάτων, Plátōn, "broad"; from 424/423 BC to 348/347 BC. The Theory of Forms - in Greek: ἰδέαι - typically refers to the belief expressed by Socrates in some of Plato's dialogues, that the material world as it seems to us is not the real world, but only an image or copy of the real world. Socrates spoke of forms in formulating a solution to the problem of universals. The forms, according to Socrates, are roughly speaking archetypes or abstract representations of the many types of things, and properties we feel and see around us, that can only be perceived by reason - in Greek: λογική - that is, they are universals. In other words, Socrates sometimes seems to recognise two worlds: the Apparent world, which constantly changes, and an unchanging and unseen world of forms, which may be a cause of what is apparent. This theory is proposed in different ways in Blake’s, Coleridge’s Shelley’s extracts. The former says that “This world of Imagination is the world of Eternity” (A Vision of the Last Judgement, 1810) a place which resembles to a sort of otherworldly realm where “Exist [...] the Permanent Realities of Every Thing (the Form) which we see reflected in this Vegetable Glass of Nature (the Apparent world)”. A similar thing is exposed by Samuel Coleridge an english romantic poet who divides Imagination in Primary and Secondary. The former is “the living Power and prime Agent of all human Perception, and as a repetition in the finite mind of the eternal act of creation in the infinite”, the latter is an echo of the former who “dissolves, diffuses, dissipates, in order to re-create” (Biographia Literaria, 1817) a thing which is totally different from…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays