Preview

Differences Between The 13th, And 15th Amendments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1049 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between The 13th, And 15th Amendments
Through the years of American history there’s been many different amendments past through the government that have given, taken, or altered the rights of all citations. While during the era of reconstruction was happening, there was 3 important amendments passed through congress theses being the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments. The 14th amendment had 5 sections within the article covering many different parts of rights of congressmen, state repetions, and people within them. Eric Foner who write the book A short history of reconstruction talks about the undergoing power this amendment had to switch power and majority in the house of legislative branch of government. There was the thought that black suffrage was not avoidable and nothing was …show more content…
The South felt as if this was another way for the union to take control of the law making. Also with the fact that it only took two thirds of the states to pass an amendment after the civil war. This lead to many of the southern whites in anger and news articles saying things speaking out against their new politicians. In the Atlanta Constitution “As Mr. Bullock who claims to be Governor of Georgia, is endeavoring to eject Democrats from their seats in the Legislation” (The Atlanta Constitution Pg. 2). The south is feels that they our losing power within the government because loss of their voted Representatives and they had people like Bullock coming in as governor. They felt these people as people who betrayed them and were considered the lowest of the low and stood right next to the swagglewags and carpetbaggers. This led to many different states in rejection of the 14th amendment and to stay strong as a whole to protect those who stood with them prewar time as their Representatives. They didn’t believe that one should lose their job or the ranks by the hand of the Republicans trying to take control of the …show more content…
That the 14th amendment took more than just that from the South it left them out to suffer through the depts that wouldn’t and couldn’t be paid by everyone in the South. The 14th amendment with in the sections 4 and 5 that make it so that debts of the confederates. This leaving farmers and soldiers without anything after the war. This is due the the fact everything was destroyed during the civil war. The farmers lost their "investment " they called salvery but, this by no means make slavory right or ethically correct by any means. Yet to most of the South this was part of their life style and they didn’t see a problem with this because they didn’t see freemen as people but as livestock. This caused the outcry for pay of their losses therough the 14th amendment but, the 14th made sure that they wouldn’t get anything. This which is statement was made within the 14th amendment section 4 "But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void" (The Atlanta Constitution pg. 1). This making the United States and states not liable for any of the debts of the South. This effect everyone within the South in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reconstruction left significant legacies, including the 14th and 15th amendments which would be used 100 years later to protect minority rights.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Again we see this trend with both the 13th and 15th amendment. In terms of the 13th, the case of Dred Scott v. Stanford comes to mind. We see the court rule and state that Americans of African descent were not American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. Along with that we also again see racial segregation upheld in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, as I talked about previously. Although there were no cases that directly overturned the Dred Scott case or the Plessy case, the fourteenth amendment paved way for equal protection and marked these two decisions infamous for their unconstitutionality. The decision in the 1954 case of Brown v. Board again pushed towards to what some consider the start of the end of racial segregation…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Southern State that seceded from the union were forced to free their slaves and pass the amendment as part of their being allowed back into the union. The South was then forced to find a new means of supporting themselves. The history behind this amendment adoption is an interesting one, according to the Author (Gorden Leinder) “Congress had passed the thirteenth amendment for an entirely different purpose­ to guarantee the legality and perpetuity of slavery in the…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These amendments were written to let all states south of 36°30' latitude to have slaves. However, to have slaves north of the line was illegal. Slavery would be legal in the District of Columbia as long as it was apart of Virginia and Maryland, and/or with the consent from the citizens to ban it. The confederates were fighting for slavery to be in more places, and because most of them lived in the North they disagreed with it. Even though John Crittenden wrote it in hopes of preventing a war, it still wasn't a good enough compromise for both…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Democrat and Republican parties of the late 1800’s had a parallel belief that it was giving a voice to its constituents. The Republicans and Democrats fought over political corruption, civil rights, reconstruction, immigration, and States’ rights. Republicans appealed to the Union, Border States, and African Americans. The South had to be rebuilt, but giving power to the Southern whites was not an option at any time. Lincoln’s 10% Reconstruction plan would swiftly allow seceded states back into the Union, but Congress did not agree with this plan and in response they came up with the Wade-Davis Bill. The passing of this bill revealed some conflicts between Congress and…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 13,14 and 15th Amendments were the first amendments made to the U.S. constitution in 60 years. Known as the Civil War Amendments, they were designed to ensure the equality for recently emancipated slaves. The 13th amendment explicitly banned slavery. An excepton was made for punishment of a crime. Theis amendment also gave Congress the power to enforce the article through legilsation.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: During the decade known as Radical Reconstruction (1867-77), Congress granted African American men the status and rights of citizenship, including the right to vote, as guaranteed by the 14th and 15th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. During Reconstruction, some 2,000 African Americans held public office, from the local level all the way up to the U.S. Senate, though they never achieved representation in government proportionate to their numbers.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many principles from the U.S constitution. One of them is federalism, federalism in the U.S constitution was divided power between the central governments and states. Federalism is a system based on democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and state governments, creating a federation. The constitution came up with amendments and the Tenth Amendment specifically is made for those powers not to be delegated to the United States by the Constitution. The national and state government has different powers. Some of the examples that the national government does is they have provide an army and navy also make treaties and conduct foreign policies, they make laws that are needed to start these powers and etc. The state government is different, they conduct elections, establish local governments, use powers the constitution doesn’t pass on to the national government or that the state doesn’t use. They also did share powers like collecting taxes, built roads, established courts, and many more. Both governments didn’t allow discrimination and provided equal protection for everyone. The Bill of Rights controlled only the federal government. The states, because of this could offer or choose not to offer the protections by the first ten amendments. After the Civil War the federal government fixed that the southern states shouldn’t be allowed without guarantees. The states that had succeeded had to guarantee black suffrage and the running of the Fourteenth Amendment which was equal protection in their new state constitutions before they…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became a new of form of slavery in the South. Many problems emerged from sharecropping. Freedmen were forced into an unending cycle of debt. They had no money to buy tools or seeds, which caused them to borrow supplies from the landowners. The plantation owners got to pick how much they charged for the supplies and what crops they would plant. This took away their economic freedom, freedmen were no longer allowed to decide what they produced to make money. The plantation owners had control over their lives because they owed them money. They influenced their decisions and limited their ability to participate in society. If the plantation owner told them that they could not vote, then they would not. This shows how their lack of economic freedom contributed to the loss of their political freedom. Therefore, this proves that It is not possible to be politically free if you are not economically…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the 13th Amendment for instance, its major backing power was for the abolition of slavery and all forms of involuntary servitude. This is because prior to the Civil War, United States was a country that was divided among itself and its people because of issues of slavery and involuntary servitude (Doniger, 1999). The Civil War was actually the very consequence of such disagreements as to whether or not slavery and human rights discrimination was a practice that needed to be continued in the country (Wagner, 2006). Having fought the Civil War as a human rights battle therefore, constitutional amendments that eliminated key human rights abuses in the country was therefore necessary and thus the Amendments that…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many African Americans wanted to grow their own crops, so General Sherman promised property to them, in 1865. There was a strip of land in Charleston that was held for African American settlement and each family was allowed 40 acres. Many former slaves desired to work for wages on the plantations of the loyal owners or Northern leaseholders. Africans Americans started to establish their own schools, churches and places in politics. President Johnson gave the former Confederates back their land, this included some of the land Sherman had promised to the African Americans. Many African American families settled on their promised land and argued that it should be theirs after working on it for so many years. Even through the families pleads, the Congress refused to concede upon the matter. The Freedman’s Bureau composed fair contracts between the land owners and the African American labor force. (MAPAH) Since the former slaves did not want to fall back into slave actions they did not work women or children, worked shorter hours and looked for the best terms. Families would cultivate pieces of land and divide the produce with the landowners, the better working conditions the landowner gave them, the better produce they would receive. The control from Republicans and African American public officials did not let the former Confederates to treat the workers as…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The crop-lien system kept millions of farmers, mostly African Americans in long term debt, and limited their way of life, from where they can live, or how they can make a living. So, in a sense much did not change in the South. Sothern’s developed a way to kept their slaves through the crop-lien system. The African American’s lucky enough to not be indebted to farmers, were victimized by Jim Crow Laws, which separated the blacks and whites in public facilities. Which made voting nearly impossible, for African…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economic fallout that the South would encounter would be devastating as well. Much of the U.S. economy at the time was based on the success of cotton, given it was distributed throughout the U.S. as well as being the primary export of America at the time. Removing this would be catastrophic for both sides but it would ruin the Southern economy.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the state constitutions in the South accepted the use of slaves because it benefited their economy and their agricultural needs. The North thought of slavery as an immoral tradition and suggested that the South band the use of slaves and conform to the “free labor” system of the North. The Southern states didn’t want to abide by the Northern states because under the Southern states constitutions, slavery was permitted. Also, the Southern states mentality was far different from the North. White farmers in the South thought themselves furrier to African-Blacks and therefore should be their own boss rather then be equal to slaves. The whole issue of slavery wasn’t that much concern for some of the people in the Union, anyways. The Northern people thought that slavery would eventually die out and the South would then be forced to adopt the North’s economic system. The North’s only concern about the South was that they would use their own ideas of “Manifest Destiny” and try to spread slavery into the new territories. When the North tried to prevent this from happening, the South got infuriated and that was the first step towards…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays