Differences Between Frederick Douglass And Abraham Lincoln

In assessing the effectiveness of Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln as leaders during the American Civil War, it is crucial to consider their actions, attitudes, and the impact they had on their respective causes.

Frederick Douglass emerges as a determined and proactive leader, advocating for the rights and fair treatment of African American soldiers serving in the Union army. His initiative to meet with President Lincoln demonstrates his commitment to addressing the injustices faced by black troops. Douglass' willingness to confront the President directly illustrates his courage and conviction in fighting for equality. As he states, "I had come to Washington to 'lay the complaints of my people before President Lincoln'" (Freedman). Douglass's advocacy for equal pay, protection for prisoners of war, and recognition for valor on the battlefield showcases his dedication
He articulates his concerns regarding the treatment of black soldiers with clarity and conviction, compelling Lincoln to consider his arguments seriously. Douglass's ability to engage in dialogue with the President demonstrates his strategic approach to effecting change. As he recounts, "Mr. Lincoln listened with patience and silence to all I had to say" (Douglass). Despite their differing perspectives, Douglass's respectful demeanor and reasoned arguments leave a lasting impression on Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln, on the other hand, exhibits leadership qualities through his receptiveness to Douglass's concerns and his willingness to engage in dialogue. Lincoln's decision to meet with Douglass, despite the overwhelming demands on his time, reflects his commitment to understanding the grievances of marginalized communities. As Douglass recalls, Lincoln's welcoming demeanor and attentive listening put him at ease, signaling his genuine concern for the welfare of all