Difference Between War And Sociological Avoidity

Is war a biological necessity, sociological inevitability, or just a bad invention? Well war is an invention. To begin it is just a way of man hood. As well as a way that we go about obtaining access to land and natural resources. This is an invention simply because there was once a time where this didn’t exist. This is a form of innovation, because it is not an elemental part in the world. Some examples of elemental things in the world is fire, water, and air. When you combine the concept of biological necessity and sociologically inevitability, one discovers that with the emerging of states and nations. Comes the use of boarders and territories that have to be developed. This theory is that if we want something we go out and get it regardless
Both inflicting harm on one another. The difference between war and a fight is that war is between two groups of people, not just two individuals. There are certain groups of people in the world some that believe in war and some that don’t. The Eskimos were a group that did not believe in war. They simply do not have the idea of warfare, so they do not practice it. As oppose to the people in the United States. So the next question is will warfare be replaced by a new invention? Margaret Mead does not even come to a clear understanding, the only thing that she has stated is that maybe it could be a
The goal is to go out and fight to kill the opponent. This warfare like this is an invention in and of its self. Some examples of this is how one does not eat their meet raw, one chose to cook it. A few more examples are the idea of writing, or even getting married. The things that are universally used are no longer inventions to some but are considered attributes of humanity. Such as marriage and the ability to create fire to get warm when it’s cold. These are still inventions whither they are universally used or not, these things did not always