Preview

Difference Between Samurai And Knights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Samurai And Knights
Have you ever wondered how the knights and the Samurai learned how to do things that they do? The knights and Samurai both learned in different ways, in different environments. In this paper you will also read about the view of women from the Samurai and knights. Lastly, you will also learn how the Samurai and knights viewed education in Feudal Japan. The time era, they existed in the 8th through the 13th century. Time era that the knights and Samurai started learning was 1400-1600. The knights were located in Europe and the Samurai were located in Japan. The knights started learning at childhood and became a knight at 21 years. The Samurai started learning at childhood and ended when they thought he was ready.

In this first paragraph, I
…show more content…
The best weapon that the Samurai had were swords that they fought with like the . If they dismounted and there were people around him he could easily strike his opponent because of his sword. This is a big advantage because opponents might not have the same but lower class weapons. A disadvantage is that the opponent could swipe it out of his hands or attack his horse and he lose control of his sword. The knights fought with axes, maces, war hammers, swords, crossbows, and spears were the weapons they used in a battle or fight. This is a huge advantage because if the break or lose one they will have another weapon to use. A disadvantage is that they could weigh you down so much that it is hard to fight and stand. In conclusion that is the weapons that the knights and Samurai …show more content…
The Samurai wives were not free to do whatever they want, they had to obey what their husband told them to do. A disadvantage is that they could not sew new clothing such as kimonos or wash the dishes at noon, they were told what to do (like a peasant). Another disadvantage is that if the husband told you to do something and you do it wrong, he might make you do it again or do something bad to you. The knights treated women kind so we got these acts of modern day chivalry as traditional forms of courtesy and kindness toward women. An advantage to this, is that you won't have a man come up to you and slap you because of their code of chivalry. Another advantage is that women back then did not get a lot of respect and so to have this ability, it was probably awesome! In conclusion, this is how the knights and Samurai viewed women in Feudal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knights Vs Samurai Dbq

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first way that samurais have an advantage is by their armor. In document D written by Terry Bennett it says “ A knight’s armor could weigh 40 to 60 pounds.” This made it harder for the to be able to move around in. The weight would slow the knights down. This gave the samurai’s an advantage to be able to hurt the enemies way faster. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is in Document D written by Terry Bennett it says how the samurai’s did not wear armor on their right arm so that they could easily draw their bow. This helped them out because if someone was coming at him unexpectedly they would have the time to draw their bow. Since they didn’t have armor on their right arm they would be able to draw it faster and attack back. Therefore, others may think it is an disadvantage but it is not due to how quickly the samurai would be able to pull out the bow and defend their self. This would be one out of so many reasons why the samurai would beat the knights in a battle.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai Dbq Analysis

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first way that Samurai's have an advantage is because of their weapons. In a video made by Terry Schappert, t says that the sword called the Katana has a very good grip and it is mainly used to cut and slice. This is a good thing because the handle is made out of sting ray skin, so it has a leathery structure. Since it is used for cutting and slicing, it would be easy to use in battle. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is in document D written by Terry Bennett. it says "The body of the armor had four parts. Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow." They don't have armor on their right arm, so it might be easier to shoot with their arrow. But the bad part is that if the armor gets wet, it becomes very very heavy.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai lived by the code of Bushido, which emphasized on the rule that they should respect and honor those above them on the social class. And they should obey all the commanders. On the contrary, the reality is a large percentage of samurai become jobless and homeless at the end of Tokugawa Era. Less of governmental offices can provide them occupations as the long period of peace for 200 years. So without war, the samurai’s role and life style dramatically changed since there was no more…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurais and Knights both have a fair chance to win a fight because of their armor. In the Terry Schappert Warrior Video produced by the History Channel it stated, ¨The Knight's sword was 4 feet long, and the sword was so sharp that the sword would go through the skull and only stop at the opponent's teeth.¨ No matter what protection Samurais had they could not stop the knight blade that can go through their skull even with a helmet. A piece of evidence that supports my claim is in document D written by the DBQ project. It says ¨The helmet bowl was made of 8 to 12 iron plates, and below it was a 5 piece neck guard.¨ The 8 or 12 iron plates could possibly ¨block¨ the sword of a knight. But something to focus on is the Knight's armor was usually 40 to 60 pounds heavy. So the Samurai's armor was…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudalism started in both Japan and Europe at the same time, but does that mean that samurai and knights are the same? Feudalism is when the knight/samurai provide service for the lord, and in exchange, the lord provides land for the knight/samurai. Samurai and Knights: were the similarity greater than the differences? Samurai and knights were more similar than different in 3 broad areas; social position, training and armor, and honor and death.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai didn’t wear armor or any protection on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow without any trouble(Document C). This made it easier for them to kill a knight or anyone who they were in conflict with. This was also very dangerous because, their arm would be vulnerable to anything that it came in contact with which then you would have one less arm. Their armor created a “shell” that provided both mobility and protection(Document C). A knight’s armor was really heavy to move as quickly, but they were very well protected from anything. This “Shell” like armor that the samurai wore made it easier to move and they were also protected. For these reasons that even though a samurai has good protection and great mobility, doesn’t mean he couldn’t…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The samurai (or bushi) were the soldiers of premodern Japan. They later created up the ruling military category that eventually became the best ranking social caste of the Edo amount (1603-1867). Samurai used a variety of weapons like bows and arrows, spears and guns, however their main weapon and image was the arm.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason why samurai and knights were different was how their armour was made. The armour knights and samurais used were used for the same purpose, which was to protect themselves during combat, but because samurais and knights fought in different types of wars, their armour was designed differently. Samurai armor…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights Dbq

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In document D founded by The DBQ Project states that “Knights had their whole body covered with metal which helped them stay more protected.”If a samurai shot an arrow at a knight, the knight would be as injured if he was not wearing a complete suit of armor. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is in document D produced by The DBQ Project it states that “Samurai’s armor was all on their body except for their right arm.”This was because it would be easier to draw their bow,but a knight can easily cut off the samurai’s right arm. The armor for the knight was an advantage,but their are more advantages for knights. The final way that knights were stronger was their Honor Code. In document E produced by The DBQ Project states that “At a ceremony a knight would take a vow to true knighthood and to do know wicked deed.”Knights had to be loyal to the king, to give mercy to anyone who asks of it,and to fight for no wrong quarrel. It also states in document E produced by The DBQ Project states that “To dishonor knighthood would be a great disgrace;to prove themselves worthy of knightly honor by...Knights had to be strong,brave,courteous,loyal bearing under great diffculties was the highest end of the…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai were a little higher up than Knights in the feudal social order. In the social order in feudal Japan if you were a Samurai you were a warrior who owed loyalty and military service to Dalmyos for land or regular payment. All of the Samurai plus their family made up about ten percent of Japans population. Now, Knights on the other hand were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to a lord for land. There were about twelve thousand Knights in England and Normany France in the twelfth century. (Documents A, B)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tokugawa era Japan was a very different period than those before it, instead of proving loyalty and honor on the battlefield it was drawn from more diplomatic situations. The Tokugawa period brought with it an era of lasting peace for nearly 250 years, and with it came different ways in which to occupy ones self. Many things in society changed including, the warring ways of the samurai where honor was drawn from the strength and skill turned into peaceful times when martial skill was practiced to maintain. However, besides the peaceful times many things remained the same about the Japanese social structure. Men and women still were very aware of honorable behavior, which held the basis for social culture. Although some similarities between the two were apparent, the more interesting seem to be the ways in which women were observed to display honorable behavior. The seemingly confined life of a women was very basic yet very strict in conduct. While men presented the strength of the household outside women held up the integrity of the house from within.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this first paragraph, I will be focusing on how samurai had views on women and on how knights had views on women. A koman was a lady that protected her team's banner from the enemy. A Tomoe Gozen was a famous lady samurai that beat the enemy's leader by fencing him. This is good…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Body Paragraph#1: Both the Europeans and the Japanese had successful warriors that helped them succeed. In both feudal Japan and Europe, constant warfare made warriors the most important class. Called the “Knights” in Europe and “Samurai” in Japan, the warriors served their local lords. In both cases, Knight and Samurais were bound by a code of ethics. Knights were supposed to agree to the concept of Chivalry, while the Samurai were bound by the Bushido, or “The way of the warrior.” Both Knight and Samurai rode horses into battles, used swords, and wore armor. The European armor, which was worn by the knights, was usually all metal, made of chain, or plate metal. Japanese…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (MIP-1)Medieval knights were trained warriors from the age of 7 who eventually became responsible for defending their feudal lords territory.(s1) (SIP-A) At age 7 a noble family's boy would start training as a page in the home of one of the lords knights and the ladies…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In early to mid Medieval Europe, the armies had nothing very complicated. The nobles had solid iron weapons, and the not as rich had brass coated in iron. There was the lance, the spear, the pike, throwing axe, battle axe, short sword, the horsebow, the longsword, broadsword, dagger, shortbow, longbow, crossbow, mallet, mace, greatsword, serrated sword, halberd, throwing knives, and the wrist knife. The lance, dagger, longsword, and horse bow were generally used by cavalry. The lance, battle axe, longsword, broadsword, dagger, mace, greatsword, and the halberd were used by men-at-arms, or knights. The serrated sword, throwing daggers, shortbow, and wrist knife were used by assasins. The longbow, mallet,…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays