Preview

Difference Between Kantianism And Rule Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Kantianism And Rule Utilitarianism
In Google's private policy it states that they can scan their users' e-mails and collect other information on their users' profiles. This brings up the ethical question of weather or not it is ethical for Google to use their users' information to generate these ads (Gibbs, 2014). There are two ethical theories that will be applied Kantianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Kantianism is an ethical theory where it states that it does not treat people as a means to an end. Rule Utilitarianism states that it is ethical if the moral rules are applied universally and that is has to look at all the actions to find which results can have the greatest amount of happiness or unhappiness (Quinn, 2013). Under Kantianism and Rule Utilitarianism is it ethical? …show more content…
Google uses automated systems to scan their user's e-mails, their Google search history, Youtube views, Google Map requests, and their cookies. Google uses this information to generate ads that are relevant to the user. Gmail uses these ads to support their service and products. Users have to accept the private policy to enter their Google Account and opt-out. Google is forcing them to accept. Google could be violating the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act or FERPA (Gibbs, 2014), which is a law that allows parents to access their child's school records, helps the parents change these records, and gives the parents control of who sees these records (U.S. Department of Education,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 Term Paper
    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment 1 Term Paper

    If anyone wants to delete their personal information from Google they can contact webmaster of the site to remove the content of the information posted. Google just removes personal information such as Social security numbers, bank account and credit card numbers, images of signature. There is also a website named reputation.com by which one can pay to them to remove the confidential content.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Blotter Vs Google Case Study
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Blotter Vs Google Case Study

    Identify facts FOR issue: In using Google’s search engine, malicious websites are made available, leading the consumer vulnerable to phishing or other malicious, fraudulent content. Google generates revenue by using online advertising and specifically, uses a program called “AdWords” to present advertisements to consumer searches.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Google Making USupid Summary
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is Google Making USupid Summary

    I would first argue about Carr’s doubt on Google’s collecting data in purpose of advertisement interest. We can’t blame a company for its commercial purposes. Every company need ways to earn its living and so does Google. Google services mostly are offered free and we could not take it for granted. The reason why Google do all these for free is related to Google’s company belief which is bringing a better technology to the whole world. Recently Google is launching a project with Wi-Fi balloon flowing around the world so that remote area could also experience the convenience of Internet. Only with macro and foreseeing believes could Google expand so large today. They provided innovative ideas and these ideas are making our daily life more convenient. So it is reasonable for Google to collect our data for commercial reason. As a search Engine Company, the biggest profit is from advertisements. Even though Carr might treat Google’s plan of building a better off artificial brain is mask of commercial interest, it is still a trend for human to develop such thing. Investor will always put their money in potential project like building a brain better than human. Sometimes it is also for political and military purpose. The competitions always exist between different countries. There are so many brilliant innovative projects and technology ideas, but only those which could gain most potential economic and…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Schiavos, Rule Utilitarianism, and Kantian Ethics
    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Schiavos, Rule Utilitarianism, and Kantian Ethics

    The case of “The Schiavos” is focused primarily on one member of the family, which is Terri Schiavo. Terri had been in a coma for 13 years. Although, “no one is completely sure what happened but the best guess is she suffered a heart attack” (Pierce, 64) presumably caused by her bulimia. Due to the severity of her heart attack, it left Terri with severe brain damaged which in turn left her in a persistent vegetative state which leaves a person showing no awareness of one’s environment. Terri’s husband, Michael Schiavo, contended that there was no hope for Terri to recover and that he felt it was his wife's wish that she not be kept alive through life support. Michael Schiavo wanted her feeding tube removed, after which Terri would slowly die. The parents of Terri however, felt that Terri “should be fed indefinitely” (Pierce, 64). Thus, creating a moral battle between her parents, and her husband as to whether or not Terri Schiavo should continue to live in her vegetative state.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism
    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Kantianism And Utilitarianism

    From the vantage point of the history of ethical theory, there can be little doubt…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Act vs. Rule Utilitarianism
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Act vs. Rule Utilitarianism

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Simplified Account Of Kantian Ethics Analysis
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Simplified Account Of Kantian Ethics Analysis

    In “A Simplified Account of Kantian Ethics”, author Onora O’Neill makes the claim that Kantianism and Utilitarianism have 2 distinct views on human life and the way it’s value should guide an individual’s morals. She firstly focuses on explaining the Utilitarian perspective on individual purpose and life value, rather dramatically calling it a task “not for the faint-hearted” (O’Neill, 4). Fundamentally, utilitarianism upholds a standard of maximizing utility, meaning that no one individual’s happiness is to be ranked above the greater good in importance. She describes Utilitarianism as “dauntingly long, indeed interminable,” (O’Neill, 4) which I personally think is true of any moral theory, Kantianism included, but more so for Utilitarianism because of its requirement of self-sacrifice.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism with Christian Ethics
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Utilitarianism with Christian Ethics

    The ethical teachings and values of utilitarianism and Christian ethics are similar in some aspects, yet however are diverse in others. Utilitarianism is a generally teleological ethical system, where the outcome is said to justify the act. The act is considered ‘good’ if it brings about the greatest good for the greatest number. Christian Ethics, however, can be quite different. Many aspects of its ethics are deontological, for example, the Decalogue and Natural Law. There are other differences and indeed some similarities which will be considered throughout this essay.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison between Utilitarianism and Idealism
    • 1153 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison between Utilitarianism and Idealism

    The two theories that will be compared and contrasted in this essay are Plato's Idealism and Mill & Bentham's Utilitarianism. I chose these two theories because, to me, they are the ones that seem to be the most realistic and interesting. The way to get from the level of the "is" to the level of the "ought" of the Philosophers in these theories are the two bests. In this essay, it will be shown that the two theories are not so different in their relation between the level of the "is" and the level of the "ought"; it will be shown that Idealism would be a better theory for a society with highly intellectual people, and that a combination of these theory would be the best way for our society to evolve from the level of the "is" to the level of the "ought".…

    • 1153 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Kant And Utilitarianism
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Difference Between Kant And Utilitarianism

    In this essay we will discuss what Kant’s and a utilitarian’s view on insider trading would be. As we have discussed in previous essays, Kant believed that moral rules could be known through reason and not just by observation (Shaw and Barry 69). For me this is the basis of all decisions that we make and why I would support Kant’s point of view on insider trading. Utilitarianism concentrates on producing the greatest amount of happiness and using it as a standard to determine if an action is right or wrong (Shaw and Barry 62). Utilitarianism requires too much concentration on individual aspects of what the greatest happiness is and basing moral standards around them.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between Utilitarianism And Relativism
    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Utilitarianism And Relativism

    The difference between utilitarianism and relativism is that in utilitarianism, something is good when it does the good for the most people. For example killing thousands of people to save billions. This is in reference to when the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. It killed thousands of people, but it was for the good of the world, and ended World War II. Another example from our textbook is of the trolley problem, where five people were on the track and the train was headed their way. They would surely be killed if the train continues. However, there is a switch that the train could be diverted into, and one person is on that track. According to utilitarianism, “you would be permitted and required to pull the switch.”…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Libertarianism Vs Utilitarianism
    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Libertarianism Vs Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism and libertinism are debatable philosophies to decide what is just. Utilitarian main principle is maximizing society happiness. From Utilitarian point of view, the best action is the action produce happiness for the greatest amount of people. Even though minority of people will suffer for the majority’s happiness. Moreover, utilitarianism measures the cost and benefit in single scale which is happiness. From this view, any other things than happiness are not valuable. On the other hand, Libertarianism is an opposite principle of utilitarianism. Libertarian principle’s core is freedom of choice without control of laws or moral. This means, individuals take the responsibility of their own choice and do whatever they want without hurting anyone. Self-ownership is the name of Libertarianism principle.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    google case study
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    google case study

    Within its corporate culture, Google always encourages well-built ethics with an eminent founding credo: “Don’t be Evil”. Honesty and integrity in all they do and their business practices are beyond criticism. They have a motto of making money by doing good things.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Google Books
    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Google Books

    Rogers, T. "Google Books: Good for Knowledge, Bad for Privacy." Information Privacy Law. N.p., 28 Mar. 2011. Web. 12 Nov. 2012. http://www.brianrowe.org/infoprivacylaw/2011/03/28/google-books-good-for-knowledge-bad-for-privacy/…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics