Difference Between American And French Revolution
American & French Revolutions
It appears that the American & French Revolutions had lots in common. After all, both took place around the same time. Both defended the desire for the republican government & principles of liberty. And lots of Americans promoted the French Revolution, & the Americas were indebted to the French, who advanced their revolution, both, providing revolutions money & material to the cause.
It’s common in academia to treat the revolutions as being more alike than different. But however, the historical records did not include that these two revolutions both began with many different views & their results are even more unalike than their views.
The American Revolutionary War… That’s what we, people call it. It was, after all, a revolution, wasn’t it? But was it really a revolution at all? If the French Revolution is the standard for how revolutions go, then the American Revolution was not a revolution at all.
First, consider the American Revolution. It’s kind of ironic that the roots of the American Revolution were British, where they move to Stuart tyranny & the divine rights of kings were well under way before the American Revolution. Even before the Americans got their, the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the British led the way, with the Magna Carta, …show more content…
Since, they refused to accept against the British, British began shortly after the of the French & Indian war in 1763 & concluded with those shots “heard round the world” at Lexington & Concord, about twelve years later. Of course, our “revolution” was long coming. The most total act occurred in 1773, when a reasonable man dressed up like the natives & dumped British tea into the Boston Harbor. However, the Boston Tea Party was a decision that was dumped & yes, the British tea was
It appears that the American & French Revolutions had lots in common. After all, both took place around the same time. Both defended the desire for the republican government & principles of liberty. And lots of Americans promoted the French Revolution, & the Americas were indebted to the French, who advanced their revolution, both, providing revolutions money & material to the cause.
It’s common in academia to treat the revolutions as being more alike than different. But however, the historical records did not include that these two revolutions both began with many different views & their results are even more unalike than their views.
The American Revolutionary War… That’s what we, people call it. It was, after all, a revolution, wasn’t it? But was it really a revolution at all? If the French Revolution is the standard for how revolutions go, then the American Revolution was not a revolution at all.
First, consider the American Revolution. It’s kind of ironic that the roots of the American Revolution were British, where they move to Stuart tyranny & the divine rights of kings were well under way before the American Revolution. Even before the Americans got their, the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the British led the way, with the Magna Carta, …show more content…
Since, they refused to accept against the British, British began shortly after the of the French & Indian war in 1763 & concluded with those shots “heard round the world” at Lexington & Concord, about twelve years later. Of course, our “revolution” was long coming. The most total act occurred in 1773, when a reasonable man dressed up like the natives & dumped British tea into the Boston Harbor. However, the Boston Tea Party was a decision that was dumped & yes, the British tea was