Preview

Difference Between Alien And Sedition Acts

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
145 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Alien And Sedition Acts
Felipe Porfirio Ferla
US History 1: Lesson 3

People would consider the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional for a number of factors. First, the moment the president deports someone he considers dangerous without any physical evidence; he is violating the Article 5 of the Bill of rights, which states that “everyone is innocent until proven guilty.” Second, the president would be again infringing the Article 5 if someone was sent to prison without a proper trial since the article holds that “no one can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Finally, it would be unconstitutional according to the Article 8 of the Bill of Rights if someone had to pay unreasonable heavy fines. In conclusion, the United States
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases
    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Ap Government Court Cases

    3. The Supreme Court decided that even though the executive order was on the shady side of the Constitution, it was justified because they were in a time of “emergency and peril”.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson vs Hamilton Dbq
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jefferson vs Hamilton Dbq

    null and void.(Doc H) In response to the resolutions Rhode Island, along with several other Federalist states, declared it was unconstitutional to nullify the Alien and Sedition Acts as doing so would blend legislative and judicial powers.(Doc I) Once elected president, Jefferson repealed these acts and even stated in his Inaugural Address that strangers unused to writing or speaking freely could do so now.(Doc…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Abraham Lincoln Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Abraham Lincoln Suspend The Writ Of Habeas Corpus

    The framers of the Constitution sought that the writ shall be included in the body of the Constitution in Article I, Section 9, stating that, “The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of Rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (site) Abraham Lincoln believed and respected the Constitution and the traditional separation of powers, however he did not feel that the framers of the Constitution intended to wait for Congress to come together to make a decision in a time of crisis. President Lincoln did not want to get rid of the writ of Habeas Corpus because prior to becoming the president he had served in congress and was a lawyer himself and therefore he understood it’s meaning and importance. (site) Suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus was not an easy decision made by Lincoln, yet as the commander in Chief of the United States it was his duty to protect the country in these extreme circumstances of protests and…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Virginia And Kentucky Resolution Research Paper
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Virginia And Kentucky Resolution Research Paper

    The Alien and Sedition Acts were brought about in 1789 (Sheflin, Early National Period). The law stated that the American people were not allowed to protests the government, the years required for naturalization going up from five to fourteen, and any citizen could be imprisoned or expelled if they spoke out against the government or were deemed dangerous by the president (Sheflin, Early National Period). The early American government was making it quite clear there would be no rebellion. That if the government saw fit, they could do what they needed to keep the peace, even if that meant silencing the people (Sheflin, Early National Period). Unlike the state's response to the Whisky act where rebellion and mob action was taking place, the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions were a practical, and more moderate path for the states to get the freedom they…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Alien And Sedition Act Of 1918
    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast The Alien And Sedition Act Of 1918

    The United States restricted civil liberties during and after the first World War by passing two acts; the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. The Espionage Act of 1917 was passed with the purpose to prohibit any interference with military operations (Links to an external site.) or recruitment (Links to an external site.), to prevent insubordination in the military, and to prevent the support of the United States enemies during wartime. Punishments under this law include jail and death.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alien and Sedition Acts Rhetorical Analysis
    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alien and Sedition Acts Rhetorical Analysis

    Timothy Pickering begins his passionate defense by addressing that the Alien Law would only affect foreigners—i.e. “aliens”—who are conspiring against the country and explains why the act is not dangerous for the nation as a whole. He then proceeds to give reasons for why the United States should not be worried about the Sedition Act either, then concludes his argument with the belief that anyone against the passage of the laws is, frankly, also against the justice system as a whole. Pickering’s usage of his framework and organization from least to greatest importance is a powerful rhetorical tool that leaves the audience asking questions and thinking for themselves. His use of parallel sentence structure throughout the piece, such as…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Alien And Sedition Acts Dbq Analysis
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alien And Sedition Acts Dbq Analysis

    The Alien and Sedition Acts were not merely intended for immigrants who spoke out against the government but more to detain the growth of the Democratic - Republican Party. These four Acts coercively lessoned the likelihood of the party mounting power by eliminating its majority group; soon to be citizens. Many issues led up to the creation of the Acts. This Cause and Effect can be traced all the way back to George Washington's Presidency; a few years after the creation of the Constitutional government after the Articles of Confederation were expulsed.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sedition Acts: Was Eugene Debs Rightly Convicted?
    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Sedition Acts: Was Eugene Debs Rightly Convicted?

    In 1919, the Supreme Court erroneously ruled the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 were constitutional under Schenck v. United States.1 This was a false premise and those convicted under these acts, including Eugene Debs, were tried under an unconstitutional law. The unconstitutional nature of the law aside, the Supreme Court failed to properly interpret the Sedition Act under which he was convicted.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Sedition Act and the Patriot Act
    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and Contrast the Sedition Act and the Patriot Act

    The time period during the creation of the Sedition Acts was a time of suspicion and fear in the United States. The government enacted laws to ensure the safety of the President and Congress because they feared the people would lose trust in the government if they read things that were distasteful. Under the Sedition Act anyone who opposed or was against United States law or against the President could be imprisoned up to two years. It was also illegal to write, speak, publish, or print anything that criticized the president or congress. Defamatory speech was anything deemed untrue or false; if a defendant proved that the speech was truthful then no crime was committed. The Sedition Act directly violates the First Amendment and free speech. Citizens were stifled because any act that had a slightly negative perspective against the government was sedition.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Should Civil Liberties Be Restricted During Times of War
    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should Civil Liberties Be Restricted During Times of War

    During America's most consequential wars, the United States government has restricted civil liberties of the American people despite the nation’s strong rooted foundation for preserving every citizen’s rights. When danger is an ever present factor for the nation due to war or conflict restrictions are often placed on some of the most basic freedoms and liberties. Perfect balancing of these restrictions is vital to the countries wellbeing. One of the most well-known examples of this type of restraint is Abraham Lincoln’s precedent of suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus and issuing martial law. Lincoln’s actions clearly violated the rights of the people that are guaranteed to them under the Constitution. While out of context it wouldn’t make much sense, the specific circumstance’s Abraham Lincoln was facing completely justified his unconstitutional orders. In retrospect we can now see how important Lincoln’s decisions were; If not for his actions the union may never have won the Civil War and history would have been irreparably altered. History repeated itself when following in Lincoln’s footstep’s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment of over 100,000 people of Japanese descent in response to Japan’s attacks on the Pearl Harbor Naval Base. The country was in a state of panic and a response was needed to make Americans feel secure. Less than five decades later a similar attack devastated America. Similar to Roosevelt, George W. Bush was catapulted into taking responsive action after the September 11th terrorist attacks on U.S soil. His response was the Patriot Act. It was our founding fathers intentions for the people of these United States to be sheltered by liberty and freedom, however, it’s clear that later day presidents used a strong balance of discretion and justice for the sake of a greater good and national security. The government should be able to impede certain civil liberties should the situation arise where it is necessary as long as…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Controversy of Individual Right and Public Order Advocates over the
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Controversy of Individual Right and Public Order Advocates over the

    The USA Patriot Act created controversy between controversy between supporters of the individual-rights perspective and the public-order advocates. Individual-rights advocate is one who seek to protect personal freedoms within the process of criminal justice. Public-order is one who seek believe that under certain circumstance involving a crime threat to public safety, the interest of sociality should take precedence over individual rights. The USA PATRIOT Act has been very controversial to Americans, simply for the fact that many believe this act invades many individual rights that we hold as American citizen. This section of the patriot act aims to protect the civil rights and civil liberties of all ethnic groups in America. I believe this section of the PATRIOT act derived from the disappearance of Mohamad Salman Hamdani. Patriot Act affects foreign travelers more than anyone, as it denies due process to a foreign visitor. This is unconstitutional as the American Government is supposed to grant due process to everyone. Law…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Alien and Sedition Acts Dbq
    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alien and Sedition Acts Dbq

    In 1798 Congress passed for bills known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. There were many controversies that developed around and because of these acts. The Alien Acts had three parts. The first part stated that you had to live on U.S. soil for at least fourteen years in oder to become a citizen. The second part stated that the President had power to deport all aliens that he thought dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States. The third part to this act stated that the United States could restrain and remove all adult aliens of the hostile nation in a time of war. There were many controversies over this act, including the debate of immigration in the United States along with other countries. The Sedition Act states that writings that are ‘scandalous and malicious’ against the government that are published would be penalized with fines or imprisonment. This Act also has many controversies that surrounded it. One in particular was the debate of whether or not that was constitutional. There were many other controversies that developed because of the Alien and Sedition Acts.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Alien And Sedition Dbq
    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Alien And Sedition Dbq

    In 1798 the Alien and Sedition act was made. This act was completely against the constitution in all ways that you look at it. People might disagree because they did not want to many people coming into the country that could hurt it. I do agree with this but not every person that come to the country didn’t want to do bad things. Some people come to live a new lifestyle because their old country was not the best. This is why this act was one of the worst ones and should have never been made.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Alien and Sedition Act 4
    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Alien and Sedition Act 4

    With a general intolerance for opponents of the war the government began to repress groups advocating against the war, as did private organizations. One such organization created to suppress anti-war ideals was the Committee on Public Information (CPI). CPI was put in place to provide trustworthy information to the public, as well as stifle any misleading wartime rumors. However, the CPI ended up creating propaganda for the government to distort the views of the American people and worked to destroy and discredit…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics