Preview

Did The Atomic Bomb Cause Mass Destruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did The Atomic Bomb Cause Mass Destruction
During the August of 1945, America dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima. The ethical debate on this topic may never be resolved, but one cannot possibly deny the negative effects.
The Atomic bomb caused mass destruction, and it was a highly risky move to begin with. The Kamikaze raids were destructive, but not on the same scale as the as the atomic bomb. We have ended World War 2 , but at what expense? Constantly fearing for the safety of our own country, as well as others? If a situation develops in which rival countries have the same means of destruction, we are in danger of entire cities being annihilated. The decision to use the atomic bomb was unjustified. The terms which were imposed after the war on Japan had not been made public. If
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Was America Justified In Ww2 Research Paper
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was America Justified In Ww2 Research Paper

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enola Gay Controversy: A Historian’s Point of View
    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Enola Gay Controversy: A Historian’s Point of View

    On January 30th, 1995 Martian Harwit, the National Air and Space Museum, or NASM, director, announced the cancelation of the exhibit “The Last Act: The Atomic Bob and the End of World War II.” This exhibit was at the center of a yearlong controversy about the Enola Gay, the United States Air Force B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb known under the code name “Little Boy” on the Japanese city Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. This act was known as the act that ended World War II and saved the lives of many American soldiers that otherwise were to invade Japan. Paul Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay sated that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was a “peace keeper…the harbinger of a cold war kept form getting hot.”2 While others believe that it was the beginning of a new holocaust due to it killing over 200,000 people, most of them civilians, not to mention the long term illnesses…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Diplomacy Hiroshima And Potsdam Analysis
    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atomic Diplomacy Hiroshima And Potsdam Analysis

    Twenty years after Harry Truman ordered the dropping of the atomic bomb, scholars and citizens subscribed to the original version of the story: the President acted to avoid the invasion of Japan and lose anywhere from 200,000 to 500,000 American lives. Then in 1965, Gar Alperovitz published a the book “Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam”. He argues that the dropping of the atomic bomb “was not needed to end the war or to save lives” but was a message to the Soviet Union. Fifty years after the atomic bomb was dropped, Alperovitz said that the final answer to why the atomic bomb was dropped is “neither essential nor possible”. He also said,”What is important is whether, when the bomb was used, the President and his top advisers understood that it wa not required to avoid a long and costly invasion, as they later claimed and as most Americans still believe.” Alperovitz believes that if the bomb was not used, Japan might still have been made to surrender before the first American landing on the island of Kyushu.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harry Truman Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harry Truman Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis

    In august of 1945, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a questionable decision by Harry Truman, the president of The United States of America. Throughout the years, it has been a heated debate in terms of whether the decision was morally correct and justified. Historians have analyzed and presented many arguments. In this short essay, I will attempt to expand on how historians feel about the decision by Truman to use atomic bombs. The revisionists bring into perspective and question the motivations of Harry Truman claiming he had more on his agenda than just the war. In my opinion, the decision to use atomic bombs was somewhat justified because if looked at statistically, the death toll with an invasion would have been higher and Truman…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Were The Americans Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima In August 1945?
    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Were The Americans Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima In August 1945?

    Historians have investigated whether the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary and what effect the bombs had on ending the war in the pacific. The government of the United States of America were divided in opinions on how to use this weapon of mass destruction, and its impact on history. However now, the decision for dropping the atom bomb was an extremely complex and connected to a wide array of problems, and many of them simply went beyond the goal of the surrender of japan. Through analysing the many intertwined issues, I personally believe that the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified, as it had saved more lives, not just for the allied forces, but also…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Truth On If The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was Necessary
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Truth On If The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Was Necessary

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified

    Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay
    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay

    One of the most controversial issues of World War II is the debate on whether or not the United States should have used an atomic bomb against the Japanese. People who tend to oppose the use of the atomic bomb tend to ignore, or are ignorant, of the history of Japan during World War II. One factor to consider is the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in countries that Japan had conquered. Another aspect was the “never surrender” mentality of the Japanese military in the territories they controlled during World War II. The final point is the estimated number of casualties for both sides. Due to these factors, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan to save lives on both sides.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific. The United States felt it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties. Not only could the lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans. The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should We Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb?
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should We Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb?

    The atomic bomb killed many innocent people, but it was necessary to end World War II.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The Atomic Bomb Wrong
    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Is The Atomic Bomb Wrong

    Thousands dead, a city devastated, and the entire world outraged. Dropping the atomic bomb is one of the most controversial events in history. Both sides of the argument hold valid reasons, and which side is correct becomes a very gray area. Before picking a side, knowing what happened is essential. The US made the decision to drop the first weaponized atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. World War II was coming to a stopping point, but which side would be the victor. The atomic race had begun, and America had to win; the winner would ultimately be victorious in the war. The atomic project, labelled the “Manhattan Project”, was started to create the atomic bomb before Germany could. Dropping the bomb devastated the city, and killed…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Atomic Bombing
    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Benefits Of Atomic Bombing

    World War II was a very controversial and drawn out war. Some people believe that the bombings were necessary to end WWII and there are many reasons as to why people believe this. World War II needed to come to an end and the only way to make that happen was to drop the atomic bombs. By doing this, there would be many benefits, but also some very harsh consequences. The atomic bombs were necessary to end the war because they allowed the US shut things down quickly, they assisted the US with showing it’s power, and it helped get justice for the soldiers that have already lost their lives fighting for their country.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics