Preview

Did Soviet Union Benefit From Its Transition Into Capitalism?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4825 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did Soviet Union Benefit From Its Transition Into Capitalism?
Did the USSR really benefit from its transition into Capitalism?
A study of economies in transition taking Russia as a case
1/1/2008
Thierry Bosnoyan |

For well over half a century the Soviet Union was one of the most powerful empires in history (1985-1991). At its peak it included 15 national republics so wide they covered 13 time zones. However the communist party determined the USSR’s political, economic and military destiny for several decades. The reform of the system aimed to enhance the whole economic structure, strengthen it and make the Soviet Union profitable and popular. Nevertheless the party opposition led to its demise in the nineties. The Soviet Union was created in October 1917 by a small but devout band of revolutionaries
…show more content…
He served as first secretary for 18 years, but under his rule the soviet regime decayed year by year, the economy stagnated, falling more behind those of the advanced industrial countries. Workers had little incentive to exert themselves now that punishment was abolished, and as it was cynically put “they pretended to pay us and we pretended to work”. The USSR did not participate in advancements in information technology, which revolutionized western economies. The living standards of ordinary citizens fell below the low minimal norms set by the state, and in the late 1980s nearly one half of the soviet population earned less than 10 dollars a month. Drunkenness was endemic; the soviet republic had the highest rate of alcohol consumption in the world as well as alcoholic deaths. The Russian population which under czarism had grown at the most rapid rate in Europe showed by the 1970s a deficit were more Russians died each year than were born. During that time corruption flourished and to get anything done, one had to bribe officials in charge of goods and services. High posts were sold to the highest bidders, theft of public property was abundant, and Russians became so accustomed to corruption that they were ready to bribe without being sure that it served purpose. The corruption in the entire nation could be summarized in the following popular quote at the time “if you don’t steal from the government, you are stealing from your family.” Economic performance was in decline were the growth rate of GDP already down from more than 5% per year since Kruschev fell from 3.7% to 2.3% by the first half of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    But Witte still needed to get loans from abroad due to the lack of capital. This helped to increase foreign investments and business confidence. In addition it helped the currency fo not having ups and downs.Finally a new rouble…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1991, when Boris Yeltsin seized the power and the Belavezha Accords were signed, the decision to disband the Soviet Union had been made and supported by the governments of Ukraine and Belarus. On December 12, 1991 Russia’s secession from the Union was sealed, the Belavezha Accords were ratified and the 1922 treaty on the creation of the Soviet Union was denounced. It had been a long road, and arguably it was predictable. It was finally time for change.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During The Cold War, There was a total of 4 change in power. Joseph Stalin being the first dictator of The Soviet Union during The Cold War, Nikita Khrushchev being the second, Leonid Brezhnev the third, and Mikhail Gorbachev the final leader of The Soviet Union. “While this meant change the underlying political reality was that the Soviet system did not trust the people. Government was retained in the hand of Party apparatchiks which the public had no role in choosing. Economically there were improvements.” Despite the improvements, living conditions were poor for the citizens of The Soviet Union. “Agriculture remained a major weakness with poor yields”. Although The Soviet try to improve life for people, life was still poor. The economics…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay Question: To what extent do you consider the Emancipation of Serfs 1861 to be a key turning point in the development of Russian government and society till 2000?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism, the term used to embody the form of government experienced by the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule, had a significant and lasting impact on the USSR. Stalinism impacted on several aspects of life. Collectivisation was introduced which assisted in the funding of industrialisation, terror was used to create a communist state. Stalin centralised every aspect of life, from the single leadership of Stalin himself to party control of the state and its functions. Free will disappeared and service to the state was expected. Consequently a Stalinist state which had a major impact on the USSR was created.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Baltic States' drive for independence, bolstered by international recognition and support, became a symbol of the broader disintegration. When the European Community and the United States began to openly welcome and recognize the independence of Soviet republics, it signaled an unequivocal international endorsement of their sovereignty, further undermining the Kremlin's authority. Additionally, the Soviet Union's involvement in Afghanistan marked a significant drain on its resources and morale, likened to the United States' experience in Vietnam, contributing to the pervasive sense of a failing empire. In conclusion, the fall of the Soviet Union was a turning point in world history that not only altered the geopolitical environment but also indicated a change in the global balance of power. Even though the Soviet Union's collapse was largely caused by internal problems, a variety of external factors and the dynamics of international relations also had a major role in exacerbating the Union's…

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian-Chechen War

    • 7694 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The USSR has inherited a large area and multinational structure of the Russian Empire. In 1917- 1921 Finland and Poland have received their independency, as well as Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Tuva. Some territories were annexed to the USSR, such as West Ukraine and West Belorussia, Baltics, Bessarabia and North Bukovina, the Tuvan People`s Republic, Transcarpathian region . The collapse of the USSR occurred due to the processes of system disintegration, which were happening in national economy, social structure, public and political areas of the Soviet Union; all these factors led to the collapse of the USSR by the close of the 1991. In December 25, 1991 the President of the USSR, M. S. Gorbachev, declared of the termination of his activity as a president according to “as a matter of policy”; in December 26, 1991 the USSR stopped its existence and Supreme Soviet of the USSR accepted a declaration on formation of CIS.…

    • 7694 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many different opinions on why the once powerful Soviet Union fell including a stagnant economy, new reform policies, or general dismissal of communist ideology. Many of the issues that were either unresolved or worsened stem from Mikhail Gorbachev reign as General Secretary from 1985 until the collapse in 1991. While there were a plethora of issues surrounding the Soviet Union, Gorbachev seemed to be the focal point of where things went from bad to worse. Though Gorbachev had the Soviet…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For most of the 1900’s, the Soviet Union was one of the most powerful countries in the world. They fought in both World Wars and they also helped to defeat the Nazis in World War 2. Even with all of their achievements, the Soviet Union’s government began to disagree with the people and even force their will upon them in the mid to late 1900’s and they finally collapsed in 1991. The collapse of the Soviet Union was caused mainly by internal issues that developed long before 1991, like the government keeping secrets from the people, or the government disagreeing with the people.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians disagree on whether the Soviet Union knew what it what it wanted all along or whether outside factors influenced the progression from the anti-fascist democratic revolutions to the creation of monolithic, socialist states. However, it is uncontestable that Stalin was the force directing the transformation of the Eastern…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Soviet Union was looking to expand their way of life and basically take away liberty, slowly but surely. It may not have seemed so at first, and it is apparent because of the actions of presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter. With their choices to deny containment in the spirit of trade and relations,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 25, 1991, the Soviet Union flag lowered for the last time. With the lowering of the flag, Mikhail Gorbachev resigns from the post of President. As changes are occurring from Gorbachev’s steady hand, people all around the world watched in disbelief as the Soviet Union was split into separate nations peacefully. These changes could not have transpired without the revolution that Gorbachev brought forward. His reform efforts would be the eventual catalyst towards demanded freedom from Eastern Europe and Yeltsin’s demands of ”democratization and rapid economic changes”.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1989 the Berlin wall fell down and soon did the power of the Soviet Union. Then in 1991 on Christmas Day the Soviet flag flew for the last time. In the beginning the Soviet Union was one of the largest communist nations with 15 states and it capital being Moscow. In World War II Eastern Europe had already become divided but in 985 Mikhail Gorbachev took power and began huge reform. He allowed more freedom of speech and began allowing open voting for each country. After the fall of the Berlin wall Gorbachev was astounded but he still kept pushing reforms. With all this change many of the states like Poland, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine seceded from the Soviet Union in order to control their own territories who were vastly different. The nation was divided between conservative communists and those who wished for democracy.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Khrushev's Policies

    • 3416 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The collapse of the USSR refers to the process of a gradual loss of legitimacy and appeal of the communist ideology and the CPSU since 1985 culminating in the disintegration of the USSR Empire from 1989 and the eventual dissolution of the USSR in December 1991. While “internal problems” refer to the inefficiencies of the Soviet command economy which stemmed from poor resource allocation, an overemphasis on quantity instead of quality and an over-commitment to defence and military build-up. It also refers to the policies implaced by Gorbachev of Perestroika, Glasnost and New thinking and how the subsequent backlash of these policies led to the USSR’s downfall. This question hence asserts that the primary and only reason for the collapse of the USSR was caused due to these internal problems and cold war aggression such as the Reagan doctrine, the containment policy had no part to play with it’s collapse. However, this assertion in itself is myopic and fails to take into account the impact cold war politics such as the containment policy and the Reagan doctrine had on the USSR. Hence, this essay will argue that while the collapse of the cold war was caused by internal problems, such as the inefficiency of the command economy which was a fundamental factor and the implementation of Gorbachev’s policies, a catalyst, cold war politics also played an important role, with the Containment policy as a foundational factor and the Reagan doctrine as a catalyst.…

    • 3416 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays