Preview

Did Andrew Jackson's Removal Act Benefit the Indians?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1681 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did Andrew Jackson's Removal Act Benefit the Indians?
Robert V. Remini shows that Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act benefits the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson made notice of the issue with the Indians in his inaugural speech on March 4, 1829. He declared that he wanted to give humane and considerable attention to the Indian’s rights and wants in respect to the government and people. Jackson knew that meant to get rid of all remaining tribes beyond the Mississippi River. He (Jackson) believed that the Indians would be better off in the west; without the influence from the white man or local authority. Jackson hired two Tennessee generals to go visit the Creeks and Cherokees to see if the Indians would leave voluntarily. In that, those who did not leave would be protected by the federalgovernment. But he implies that if they refuse to move, their race would most likely be destroyed.

Jackson became very concerned about the Native Americans. He was well liked by many chiefs due to his worrying for their welfare. He even took an orphaned Indian and raised him. Jackson was sure that as soon as the Indians adopted the white man’s’ habits, they would become complete citizens. But Jackson felt that since the white man wanted Indian territory and the two races could not cooperate, it would be best for the existence of Indians if they were removed.

Jackson was concerned about national security and he was a racist (even though he had no clue what that word meant,) but he did not want to kill the Indians. He wanted to relocate them so that they could be safe from the white men who wanted them dead for their land. So the two men (Carroll and Coffee) that Jackson had hired to talk to the chiefs of both tribes did not have the skill to do so. The chiefs did not want to move their tribes, nor did they know the land they would be moving to. They would have to leave the land that their fathers were buried in. Both the Creek and Cherokee chiefs denied commissioners request to emigrate, and told

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson believed whites were more superior than Native Americans. He also believed that Indians were unable to handle their own personal and financial affairs. For this reason, Jackson was firmly against Indian sovereignty.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronal Takaki opens our eyes to a different view of one of our early presidents. Andrew Jackson was for removing the Indians, “He supported the efforts of Mississippi and Georgia to abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 81). He believed that the deaths of Indians meant that America was advancing civilization. Andrew did not feel guilty about what he stood for. Although they were laws that protected the Indians and their land, he did not obey them. Instead, he would ignore them, “Supreme Court ruled that…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson was in no uncertain terms, a tyrant. Specifically to native Americans, but somewhat extending to the African American slave population as well. Under Andrew Jackson’s administration, the policy of Indian Removal saw its greatest enactment. Jackson essentially forced the Native Americans off their lands, all the while ignoring supreme court decisions that stated such actions were indeed unconstitutional.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He applied this view as President in his dealings with the Indians. He wrote to William Harrison, governor of the Indiana territory, and stated: “they will perceive how useless to them are their extensive forests and will be willing to pare them off from time to time in exchange for necessaries for their farms and families” (Calloway 266-267). Although his view was that Indians were inferior, he at least thought them capable of making progress. President Jackson hold a much harsher view, “What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few savages to our extensive republic” (Calloway 268). Where Jefferson had some measure of civility Jackson had none. Jackson wanted the Indians removed from their lands east of the Mississippi, especially the Cherokee, and he used the force of the American government to that…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was also rich which meant he owned many slaves and he was the biggest slave owner at the time. Jackson thought democracy was having all the parts of the government listen to what the people have to say, but he completely ignored all of the Native Americans. Document H shows the hate he had against the Native Americans. In his message to the congress it said, “This emigration should be voluntary… if they remain within the limits of the states they must be subject to their laws”. What this means for the Natives is that if they go back to the states they would get in trouble with the law. He forces them to move farther west and basically just kicks them out of their original territory. In Document K it states, “The country west of the Arkansas territory is unknown to us.” Jackson made it a law for having the Native Americans never return to the states even though he wants to treat everyone equal. He’s moving these people into a place their not familiar with and they don’t know where resources are and don’t know who’s out there to communicate…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson and The Native Americans was an attempt on changing our lives and the way we lived. Andrew Jackson thought that the Natives should be removed and put at the Great Plains. In 1830 Jackson had congress pass a law called “ The Removal Act” which provided the money to relocate them. Most of the Natives packed up and resettled to the west. On the other hand the Cherokee’s that were in…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson Villain

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1814, President Jackson commanded the military force that defeated the Creek nation. In the Creek nation’s defeat, the Creeks “lost 22 million acres of land in southern Georgia and central Alabama” (PBS, Indian Removal). Andrew Jackson championed the malicious and imperial “Indian Removal Act” through both of the houses of Congress in 1830. The Indian Removal Act permitted President Andrew Jackson to “disavow earlier treaty commitments and force the 74,000 Indians remaining in the East and the South to move to federal lands west of the Mississippi River” (Shi and Tindall 330). Under these agreements, the Native Americans were to voluntarily hand over their lands “east of the Mississippi and in exchange for lands to the west” (PBS, Indian Removal). Despite the rhetoric proposing a voluntary and fair exchange of their lands, the Indian Removal Act cleared the way for the U.S. militia to drive out the Native Americans from their own land with brute force under President Jackson’s…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He thinks of this act as lucky towards the Natives, and all they have to do is arrive at their new homes. According to Andrew Jackson’s State of the Union Address to congress, “Congress’s kind policy of indian removal has almost been achieved.” Andrew Jackson is describing the act like it’s the nicest thing Congress could do regarding the Natives. Andrew Jackson thinks that this policy is fair and peaceful. Jackson makes the rhetorical question ”How can it be cruel?” He views the act as if there is nothing bad about it and he can’t see a reason why it’s cruel or unfair. It benefited the United States in his opinion and showed how strong our country is. The Address also states that, “To save the red men from utter annihilation, the government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the the whole expenses of his removal and settlement.” He makes this seem like congress is doing the “dirty work” for them and all they have to do is settle into their new homes easy peasy. The Natives should be happy and thankful that Congress is protecting them and paying all of their expenses for them to be safe. Therefore, Andrew Jackson thinks the Indian Removal Act was a kind, generous, fair and peaceful act from…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This required them to: leave their old life, travel a dangerous journey, and ultimately live new lives. “But though the War Department made some attempts to protect those who stayed, it was no match for the land-hungry whites who squatted on Choctaw territory or cheated them out of their holdings. Soon most of the remaining Choctaws, weary of mistreatment, sold their land and moved west.” (Indian Removal) The whites basically came into the Native American’s land and squatted their territory. It resulted in them moving out of their homes and into the west. This removal wasn’t meant to be violent, “This act affected not only the southeastern nations, but many others further north. The removal was supposed to be voluntary and peaceful, and it was that way for the tribes that agreed to the conditions. But the southeastern nations resisted, and Jackson forced them to leave.” (Indian Removal) As the Native Americans were less cooperative, they ended up being required to move. As Native Americans moved, they would experience an incredibly dangerous journey. “At the beginning of the 1830s, nearly 125,000 Native Americans lived on millions of acres of land in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida–land their ancestors had occupied and cultivated for generations. By the end of the decade, very few natives remained anywhere in the southeastern United States.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    history final exam

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, was famed for his ability to use violence to make room for the expansion of white culture in America. He proudly announced to Congress that the removal of Indians from white settlements was approaching a happy consummation. He believed that by buying Indian land, paying for their relocation, and supporting them for a year in their new location, would end any and all problems between…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A major dilemma for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson failed at protecting the rights of Native Americans. As shown in the picture, Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. Did the Native Americans not have the same rights as the whites living in the South? Apparently Jackson and his successor Martin Van Buren did not ever consider this question and upon this they failed to protect the Constitution. In relation to the issue of Indian removal came another violation of the Constitution by Andrew Jackson. When John Marshall and the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's extension of state law over Cherokee land was unconstitutional, Andrew Jackson totally ignored the decision. This action violated Supreme Court decisions and strengthened Jackson's reputation as an enemy of the law.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Andrew Jackson

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When it came to protecting individual liberties, Jacksonians favored the white male population, but totally ignored others. They wanted to move all of the Indians who lived in the eastern lands to western lands past the Mississippi River. Jackson bolstered their case. Even after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee tribe and its right to remain where it was, Jackson did not comply and he forcefully ejected the native people from their land. The Trail of Tears shows the painful journey the Indians had to take; the journey killed almost 4,000 people (doc. G). Jackson, by instigating the demise of the Bank, failed to protect the individual liberties of the wealthy class. In Document C, Daniel Webster states, “…It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich; it wantonly attacks whole classes of people, for the purpose of turning against them the prejudices and the resentments of the other classes.” This quote shows that Jackson violated the wealthy peoples’ liberties because of his own biased opinions.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page

    Jackson had plans for the expansion of America, as he thought expansion the key to America’s success. Many Whites were afraid of the Native Americans and of the Cherokee Nation. In 1830, he passed a law that was called the Indian Removal Act. Indians were moved and many died due to starvation and the cold on their travels. The removal of Cherokee Indians to Oklahoma Territory came to be known as the “Trail of Tears.”…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson sincerely believed that in order to have a perfect nation, it was needed to remove the Indians to the west side of the Mississippi River. He went to Congress and with his first annual message addressing his case of the Removal Act on December 8, 1829; he announced that “The consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves. The pecuniary advantages which it Promises to the Government are the least of its recommendations. It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians”(Shmoop Editorial Team; Indian Policies). As you can see, Jackson thought that if the Natives were removed from the east side of the Mississippi River, it would prevention issues between the Federal and State Governments; also providing economic advantages.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Andrew Jackson, being a frontiersman, believed that white settlers had the right to seize Indian lands. After being pushed out of their lands all the way to Georgia, a deal was made to the Cherokees and Chickasaws, the deal stated that if the Indians would take up white men's ways they wouldn't be forced away from their land again. While some Indians agreed, others went to the supreme court asking for…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays