Deviance Theory and Drug Use

Topics: Sociology, Criminology, Drug addiction Pages: 5 (1619 words) Published: December 14, 2005
Theories of Deviance Applied to Drug Use
Since the dawn of society there have been people whose behavior differed from the rest of society. There are many different theories and perspectives on why people do things like abuse drugs, and although we my never have all the answers, sociology still help us to understand the problem better.

In order to understand the theories of deviance, and apply them to drug use in our society one must first understand what deviance is. Alex Thio defines deviance as "an act that is considered […] to be a violation of some social rule" (448). Social rules that delineate how individuals in a society should behave are called norms. There are two types of norms: mores and folkways. Mores are strong norms that specify behavior and constitute demands- most mores are laws. Folkways are weak norms influencing behavior within a society- folkways usually relate to proper etiquette in a society (Thio 42-44).

There are three factors that influence whether an act is considered deviant. The first is time period, the second is location, and the third is public consensus. Different time periods have different norms. An example of this is, how until 1865 Americans were allowed to have slaves; however, in 2003 having a slave would be a violation of mores. Deviance is also limited to location. In some countries it is okay for young children to have alcohol with meals, but not in the United States and Canada. Not only do time and location factor into identifying deviance, but also so does public consensus. There is not a law that states one must not blow his or her nose on his or her neighbor's shirt, but almost no one does that. It would be a violation of one of societies folkways (Thio 44,142).

There are two main types of deviance, criminal and non-criminal. Non-criminal deviance violates a norm, but not necessarily a law. Non-criminal deviance is usually not formally punished, but may have unfavorable results. An example of non-criminal deviance would be homosexuality or use of pornographic materials. Criminal deviance on the other hand violates both a norm and a law. Criminal deviance is punishable by law enforcers. Examples of criminal deviance include: rape, murder, robbery, and what the focus of this paper- drug abuse (Thio 143-144).

There are three main perspectives relating to sociology and deviance: Conflict perspective, Functionalism, and Symbolic Interactionist. The conflict perspective gives a rather negative view of society. It states that society is always changing and that change results in competition. There are two main ideas being discussed my conflict theorists: power theory and conflict theory (Thio 11). Power theory suggests that those who have more control in society will use it to manipulate those with no power (Flory 2). Conflict theory ask, "Who makes the rules and who benefits from their enforcement" (Deviance 1).

Functionalism is a more positive outlook; it states that every society is made up of interdependent parts and each segment serves a function. When applying this perspective to deviance there are three main parts: Merton's strain theory, Durkhiem's functionalist theory, and Hirschi's control theory (Thio150-152). Merton's strain theory proposes that society sets high goals that one may not achieve through legitimate means (Flory 1). Durkhiem's functionalist theory introduces the idea of anomie a condition of deregulation that was occurring in society, and people did not know what to expect from one another. This causes some individuals to detach from society and find their own way of achieving goals (Durkhiem 1). Hirschi's control theory suggests when people cannot form strong bonds within society; they form a subculture, and develop their own norms (Overview 2).

The third perspective is the symbolic interactionist theory. Symbolic interactionism provides a micro view of society; instead of focusing on how the individual affects society, interactionism...

Cited: CRIME and DEVIANCE. 8 Dec. 2003 .
< >
Flory, Jim. Drugs and Deviance. 5 Dec. 2003
< >
Flory, Jim. The Sociological Perspective and Drug Use. 5 Dec. 2003

Houts, Leslie. Deviance and Criminology. 6 Dec. 2003

Keel, Robert. Social Context of Deviance. Oct.6, 2003. 5 Dec. 2003
< >
Theories of Deviance and Social Control. 8 Dec. 1998. 7 Dec. 2003
< >
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Marxists theory to the sociological understanding of crime and deviance Essay
  • Theories of Deviance Essay
  • Theories of deviance Essay
  • deviance Essay
  • Labelling Theory and Deviance Essay
  • Essay on Deviance
  • Limitations of theories of sociology of deviance Essay
  • Deviance: Sociology and Strain Theory Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free