Preview

Developing a Definition of Justice

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1097 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Developing a Definition of Justice
Developing a Definition of Justice In Book I of Plato 's The Republic a definition of justice begins to develop in Socrates ' conversations with Cephalus, Polemarchus and Thrasymachus. Through these conversations we, as readers, come closer to a definition of justice.Three definitions of justice are presented: argued by Cephalus and Polemarchus, justice is speaking the truth and paying ones debts; Thrasymachus insists that justice is the advantage of the stronger; Socrates suggests that justice is a craft like such as aiding the sick or being a captain of a chip. Through speculation Socrates disproves the later definitions. Also, through said speculation certain defining characteristics evolve. Socrates disproves his company 's arguments of what justice is through the use of analogies and syllogisms. The syllogisms lead us closer to the definition of justice as two definitions are eliminated by Socrates and only his proposed definition survives the scrutiny of the mens argument. Socrates finds many flaws in Cephalus ' and Polemarchus ' definition of Justice as speaking the truth and paying ones debts. The conversation about justice arises when Socrates questions Cephalus about the greatest good his wealth had brought to him. Cephalus replies that wealth aids one to live a just life by saving one from having to cheat and deceive in order to have life 's necessities. Wealth helps to insure that no sacrifices or money is left owed at the end of ones life, therefore, one can die a just person without fear of Hates. Socrates discredits Cephalus ' account of justice by suggesting a situation where speaking the truth and paying ones debts would not be just: " . . . if a sane man lends a weapon to his friend and then asks for it back when he is out of his mind, the friend shouldn 't return them, and wouldn 't be acting justly if he did.
Nor should someone be willing to tell the whole truth to someone


Cited: Grube, G.M.A., Reeve,C.D.E. Plato:Republic. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 1992.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates: A True Champion Of Democracy
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates: A True Champion Of Democracy

    He must do this regardless of the opinion of the majority or possible consequences for himself; he must act only in accordance to the opinion of the few wise, knowledgeable men who understand what is justice, and the laws of the State. Unfortunately, in all of the dialogues the author of this essay has read5, Socrates never clearly explains what ‘the laws’ really are — they remain a sort of abstraction, a divine essence of justice. However, this does not invalidate our definition of a champion of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Certainty as the Standard of Knowledge
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Certainty as the Standard of Knowledge

    and knowledge in order to pursue it; the explication of the concept of justice, and its…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates vs Thrasymachus
    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates vs Thrasymachus

    Any argument relies upon some fundamental agreement about the issue being discussed. However great the divide in opinion may be, there must exist at least some similarity in the participants’ manner of viewing the issue if a solution is ever to be reached. Book One of Plato’s Republic features a disagreement between Socrates and Thrasymachus about the nature of justice. The disaccord between their views of the subject is extremely pronounced, but there are certain underlying agreements which guide the course of the debate. One way to evaluate the validity of the arguments involved is to examine whether the assumptions at the root of the argument are in accord with this common ground. By my reading of the dialogue, Socrates’ reply to the first part of Thrasymachus’ definition of justice rests safely upon this common ground, whereas his answer to Thrasymachus’ second definition moves away from this mutually acceptable base, and is injured as a result. In exploring this topic, I intend to examine briefly Thrasymachus’ two-part definition of justice. For each of these parts I will evaluate one Socratic response and discuss it from the perspective of the “craftsman analogy” – an analogy which is initially used by common consent, but which Socrates adapts until its original usage almost disappears.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Republic: the Plausibility of Thrasymachus' Argument on Justice
    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Republic: the Plausibility of Thrasymachus' Argument on Justice

    It is my objective in this paper, to illustrate the claims made by Thrasymachus, in The Republic, as argument to Socrates' views on what justice is. I will then evaluate the claims, "justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger" (338c), and that "a just man always gets less than an unjust one" (343d), in an effort to see how Thrasymachus uses these statements to provoke an argument. Despite the contradictory nature of these statements, I will attempt to show, through the analyzing of Thrasymachus' speech, that they are actually related. Thrasymachus uses these statements to create an overall picture of his idea of justice to the people in an effort to get Socrates to retract his statements on what justice is. After analyzing these arguments, I will deduce that Thrasymachus' argument is not plausible.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plato and Crito
    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato and Crito

    In Plato’s Crito, Crito attempts to persuade Socrates to flee from his death sentence. However, Crito fails because Socrates presents a counter argument which invalidates much of Crito’s original pleas. Despite this, a fallacy of justice may have been created. Even so, the Republic’s conception of justice seems to have little impact on Socrates’ existing ideas on justice.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Republic- Arguments about Justice
    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato's Republic- Arguments about Justice

    Cephalus begins by explaining meetings he has with men of his same age where the majority “recites a litany of all the evils old age has caused them” (Plato, 329b). They reminisce on the pleasures of their youth and blame old age as the root cause for their feeling deprived. Cephalus uses this premise and the conclusion of old age as a stepping stone to his real conclusion. Cephalus uses an example of a conversation he overhears between Sophocles and another man to support his argument. Sophocles compares the “pleasures” the group of old men were lamenting over earlier as slavery and explains how age has made him free from that previous hold on him. “I am very glad to have escaped from all that, like a slave who has escaped from a deranged and savage master. You see, old age brings peace and freedom from all such things” (Plato, 329c). Cephalus then states to Socrates, “the real cause isn’t old age, but the way people live” (Plato, 329d).…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Cheryl Mahaffy's Article 'Face To Face'
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analyzing Cheryl Mahaffy's Article 'Face To Face'

    Justice is an apparoach to justice that focuses on the needs and morals of the victims rather than a…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic
    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    Socrates attempts to define the true meaning of justice by critiquing the ideas of other philosophers. In book 1 of Plato’s Republic the debate among Socrates and his colleagues begins with Cephalus, who first defines justice as simply being honest and repaying one’s debts. Cephalus is a wealthy, elderly man who acquired much of his fortune through inheritance as Socrates points out. Socrates divulges this to explain that those who come from money are not as fond of it as those who are self-made men. This is because self-made men love their wealth as a creation of oneself much like a craftsman loves their art or a father loves his son. Cephalus then explains that the greatest function of wealth, for those of good character, is to be able to repay debts and to avoid defrauding people and lying to them. Thus his definition of justice is derived from the importance of money.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus’ Views on Justice
    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thrasymachus’ Views on Justice

    In Book I of Republic, Socrates attempts to define justice with the help of his friends and acquaintances. After a number of suggestions prove false or insufficient, Thrasymachus tries his hand to define the term, convinced that his definition rings true. Thrasymachus begins in stating, “justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger,1” and after prodding, explains what he means by this. Thrasymachus believes that the stronger rule society, therefore, creating laws and defining to the many what should be considered just. He pertains, however, that the stronger create said laws for their own benefit and therefore in acting justly, the ruled are performing for the rulers benefit and not their own. This argument is not feasible for a variety of reasons. One of the key characteristics of justice is fairness, which can also be defined as being reasonable or impartial.5 Impartiality means that you…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice Through the Eyes of Plato and Hume
    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Justice Through the Eyes of Plato and Hume

    Plato. The Republic of Plato: Transl. with Notes and an Interpretative Essay by Allan Bloom. Trans. Allan David Bloom. New York: Basic, 1991. Print.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Applying Ethical Framework In Practice
    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Applying Ethical Framework In Practice

    * Justice refers to the theory that everyone is entitled to a fair and equal share of resources regardless of who they are or how much they have contributed. (ANA, n.d.)…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice and Morality in Plato's Republic
    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Justice and Morality in Plato's Republic

    Explain and evaluate the reasons given by Plato in the Republic, to support the contention that justice is superior to, or more beneficial than, injustice?…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates Unjust

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Republic: Socrate vs. Thrasymachus
    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Republic: Socrate vs. Thrasymachus

    This definition of justice is not in accord with Socrates', who refutes it with much discontent by Thrasymachus. He is accused of being a sycophant in addition to not being capable of answering anything but only to provide refutations to any opinion mentioned before him (336c). Thrasymachus is begged not to leave the conversation and to stay and discuss what he has just revealed to come to conclusion as to what justice really entails.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice In Plato's The Republic
    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Justice In Plato's The Republic

    In The Republic by Plato, a meta-ethical question is raised “What is justice?” The meaning of justice may mean almost anything in today’s society. During Plato’s time, however, justice is intimately connected with fairness. It is the idea that people should get what they deserve. Benevolence and mercy may lead us to give people more than they deserve but justice insists on them getting all and only what they deserve: nothing more, nothing less. In his infamous passage where Thrasymachus argues that Justice is whatever is in the interest of the stronger, Socrates particularly portrays that injustices not be done, that people be treated according to the law and not according to the whims or desires of leaders or people in general. To further…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics