Preview

Developing pragmatic competence in EDeveloping pragmatic competence in EFDeveloping pragmatic competence in EFL classroom in ChinaL classroom in ChinaFL classroom in China

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Developing pragmatic competence in EDeveloping pragmatic competence in EFDeveloping pragmatic competence in EFL classroom in ChinaL classroom in ChinaFL classroom in China
Developing pragmatic competence in EFL classroom in China
1. Introduction
As the world is increasingly globalized, the exchange of commodities and ideas across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate (Pakir, 1999). Consequently, the cross-cultural communication has become more and more important. English, as an international language, is increasingly used throughout the world. In China, English even is among the core subjects at school and deserves a place in the curriculum. However, many Chinese English learners may not comprehend the utterances correctly and be able to express themselves properly in real-life communication, even though they get high scores in general proficiency test such as college entrance examination or CET 4 or 6. That is because these EFL learners lack necessary pragmatic competence. Pragmatic competence refers to “the ability to use language effectively in order to achieve a specific purpose and to understand language in context” (Thomas, 1983: 92). This problem is consistent with Bardovi-Harlig’s research finding. According to Bardovi-Harlig (1999: 686), “high levels of grammatical competence do not guarantee concomitant high levels of pragmatic competence”. Thus, it is necessary for teachers to help Chinese English learners developing their pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms.
This paper first introduces pragmatic competence. Next, it discusses the importance of and the teachability of pragmatic competence. It then analyzes the possible causes that lead to this problem. Finally, this paper explores some potential solutions for the teachers to help Chinese English learners to develop pragmatic competence in EFL classrooms.
2. Pragmatic competence
2.1 The definition of pragmatic competence
Many scholars have given their own definitions of pragmatic competence. Thomas (1983: 92) points out that the speaker’s “linguistic competence” consists of grammatical competence and pragmatic competence. “Pragmatic competence” refers to “the



References: Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do things with words : The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999) Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics. Language Learning. 49 (4): 677–713. Bachman, L. F. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford Press. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996) Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. In Bouton, L. F. Pragmatics and language learning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, pp. 21-39. Bardovi-Harlig, K., and Griffin, R. (2005) L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33(3), pp.401-415. Brown, H. D. (1994) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 3rd, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. Candlin, C. N. (1976) Communicative language teaching and the debt to pragmatics. In Rameh, C. (ed.) 27th Round Table Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. pp. 237-256. Canale, M. (1983) From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J, C. and Schmidt, R, W. (eds.) Language and Communication. London: Longman. Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Edwards, M. and Csizér, K. (2004) Developing pragmatic competence in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum. 42(3), pp.16-21. Faerch, C. &. Kasper, G. (1986) The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, pp. 257-274. Hu, Z. (2014) Study on Developing Chinese College EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence in Relation to Language Proficiency and Overseas Experience. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 5(2), pp. 391-398 Ji, P Kasper, G. (1997a) Can pragmatic competence be taught? [online]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Available from:www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/Net-Works/NW06/ [Accessed 26 August 2014] Kasper, G Leech, G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. Lei, N. (2012) Developing pragmatic competence in Chinese EFL classroom. Overseas English, pp. 20-24. Pakir, A. (1999) Connecting with English in the context of internationalization. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (1), pp. 103-114. Richards, J Rinte, D. E. (1979) Getting your speech act together: the pragmatic ability of second language learners. Working Papers in Bilingualism 17(3): pp.97-106. Savignon, R. and Wang (2003) Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(3), pp.223-249. Schmidt, R. W. and Richards, J. C. (1980) Speech acts and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2(1), pp.129-157. Shen, Q.Y. (2013) The Contributing Factors of Pragmatic Failure in China’s ELT Classrooms. English Language Teaching. 6(6), pp.132-136. Thomas, J. (1983) Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), pp. 91-112.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    -Pragmatics= how we use lang to convey our intended meaning within a particular social context and how we figure out others' intended meanings…

    • 10440 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Klapper, J (1998) Language Learning at School and University , Language Learning journal 18, p23-27…

    • 6976 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pragmatics And Halliday

    • 373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PRAGMATIC DEVELOPMENT 3 Copyright © 2009 www.englishteaching.co.uk + www.english-teaching.co.uk WHAT DO WE MEAN BY PRAGMATICS? Pragmatics is an area of language study linked to the things people mean rather than what they actually say.…

    • 373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.…

    • 3722 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under this new perspectivization, the role of teaching in the development of L2 pragmatics has received a lot of ink in the review of the literature (see Martinez- Flor et al, 2003; Kasper, 2001; Kasper & Rose, 2002). In general, the popular belief is that instruction on a variety of pragmatic features can benefit the learners considerably (Olshtain and Cohen, 1990; Takahashi, 2001; Rose and Ng Kwai-Fun, 2001, Safont,…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study of pragmatic types of sentences is an important sphere of linguistic studies, as the knowledge of language requires not only ability to build up sentences (language competence), but also ability to use them correctly in speech acts in order to achieve needed communicative-functional result (communicative competence).…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pragmatic Failures Study

    • 2924 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [10] Thomas, J. Cross- Cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1983:91- 110.…

    • 2924 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 2 ]. LEECH, Geoffrey N. Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman, 1983, xii, 250 p. ISBN 05-825-5110-2.…

    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are a number of language competencies which English language learners must develop, in tandem, in order to communicate successfully in English. Any successful communicative event, at least one that extends beyond expressions of simple, immediate need, will require that L2 speakers have developed some mastery of the syntax, morphology, phonology and lexis of the English language. Yet, as many English teachers recognize, and as many language learners have experienced first-hand, speech acts that are grammatically and phonologically correct sometimes fail because the learner’s pragmatic competence—his or her ability to express or interpret communicative functions in particular communicative contexts—is undeveloped or faulty. Pragmatic incompetence in the L2, resulting in the use of inappropriate expressions or inaccurate interpretations resulting in unsuccessful communicative events, can lead to misunderstanding and miscommunication and can even leave the native-speaking interlocutor with the perception that the L2 speaker is either ignorant or impolite. The following simple scenario illustrates the importance of pragmatic competence. Two learners of English ask a native speaker, with whom they are unacquainted, to lend them a pen. One learner uses the phrase, “Borrow your pen,” while the other asks, “Could I borrow your pen?” Both requests are easy to understand. Both result in the desired response. Yet in this context native speakers would likely respond more favorably to the request of the second learner over that of the first, simply because it is more appropriate. Parents know that pragmatic competence or contextual appropriateness does not always develop as quickly in their children as they might wish. Some years ago the first author and his wife would often visit…

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pragmatic is the study of how meanings are used by speaker. In pragmatic, meaning has contextual meaning, and we can have several meanings just from one utterance, on the other words, the meaning of one utterance is varied. There are also interlocutors in pragmatic. They are speaker and listener. These interlocutors must communicate well with cooperative principle. The cooperative principle allows us speaking to someone showing our cooperation. This cooperation impacts to the dialogue so that the communication can run sustainably.…

    • 3593 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    11. Oxford, R.L. and D. Crookall, 1989. Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings and instructional issues. The Modern Language J., 73(4): 404-419. 12. Ching-Yi, Ch, Shu-Chen, Ch and L. Yi-Nian, 2007. A study of language learning strategies used by EFL learners in Taiwan. Retrieved October 6, 2010 form http://www.mdu.edu.tw/~ged/ other % 20download/bulletin/20070319/11.pdf. 13. Rubin, J., 1994. A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language J., 78(2): 199-221. 14. Macaro, E., S. Graham and R. Vanderplank, 2007. A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In: A.D. Cohen and E. Macaro, Eds., language learner strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp: 165-185. 15. Teng, H.C., 1997. An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students. Proceedings of the sixth International Symposium on English Teaching, 6: 509-520. 16. O’Malley, M., A.U. Chamot, g. Stewner-Manzares, L. Kupper and P.R. Russo, 1985a. Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL Students. Language Learning, 35(1): 21-46. 17. Zarafshan, M. and F. Sadighhi, 2006. Effects of attitude and motivation on the use of language learning strategies by Iranian EFL university students. Retrieved May 22, 2011 from http:// www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/103120064607.pdf. 18. Griffiths, C. and J. Parr, 2001. Language-learning strategy: theory and perception. ELT J., 53(3): 247-254. 19. Nunan, D., 1988. The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 20. Kazempour, Y., 2009. Language learning strategies: Iranian EFL teachers’ and students’ Perceptions, M.A.Thesis, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. 21. Nambiar, R. 2009. Learning strategy research –where are we now. Retrieved April 5, 2010 from http://www.reading matrix.com/ articles/ sept_2009/nambiar.pdf.…

    • 4120 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pragmatic investigations cover the fields of both linguistics and philosophy. In language studies, pragmatics is a very wide field. It examines our use and our understanding of the language we speak and hear, read and write. Pragmatics examines the importance in language studies of our general knowledge, and the importance of common-sense knowledge of our world.When we use language, we unconsciously assume that we are talking to somebody who has grown up in the same sort of world as us. Somebody who thinks like us. This can lead to confusion in conversation, especially between people from different countries or social backgrounds.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corpus Evaluation

    • 3471 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Nowadays, a large amount of researchers are paying their attention on the demand of producing “communicatively appropriate performance” (Schmidt & Richards, 1980) as well as development of pragmatic competence. In fact, many of the learners of a target language probably do not realize that some socially and culturally inappropriate patterns may lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations. Pragmatic failures between language learners and native speakers of a target language show up as a universal phenomenon in the process of learning another foreign language. Therefore, more efforts should be made to probe into the reasons that may cause these failures and therefore find appropriate approaches to reduce their effects on communication. Drawn on Jiang’s (2006) research, this analysis makes an attempt to encompass two aspects: the contrast between the interactions during Study Groups and Service Encounters, and the comparison of syntactic structures of suggestions between 3 old and 3 new ESL textbooks. Pertinent differences between the findings of this study and those in Jiang (2006) will be discussed.…

    • 3471 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communicative competence is the ability to use a language properly and suitably to achieve communication goals. The Communicative Approach in language learning is based on the idea that the goal of language acquisition is communicative competence.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of pragmatics is not new. A significant contribution to the study was made by such scientists as Austin, Morris, Wezhbicka, Grice, Goffmann and others.…

    • 3907 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays