This theory was popular during the cold war with regard to the use of nuclear weapons but overall it was a strategy intended to persuade an adversary from taking action first. Deterrence theory assumes that crime can be prevented if potential offenders weight the pros and cons of the crime (Zimring and Hawkins 1973). Three concepts that play an important role in deterrence theory are the certainty, severity, and swiftness of punishment. The deterrent effects of crime prevention programs and policies are a function of a potential offender’s perceptions of the certainty, severity, and swiftness of punishment (Nagin 1998). First, the focus typically begins with an intense focus on specific types of crime and the offenders that are most responsible for carrying out those crimes, most of which involve gun violence. Second, the focus is often referred to as “pulling levers” strategies because they seek to apply every lever available, whether it is formal or informal. Third, which may alter objective sanction risks unlike any of the other two strategies, focus is to seek direct influence perceived sanction risks among offenders by communicating directly with them about the consequences of their
This theory was popular during the cold war with regard to the use of nuclear weapons but overall it was a strategy intended to persuade an adversary from taking action first. Deterrence theory assumes that crime can be prevented if potential offenders weight the pros and cons of the crime (Zimring and Hawkins 1973). Three concepts that play an important role in deterrence theory are the certainty, severity, and swiftness of punishment. The deterrent effects of crime prevention programs and policies are a function of a potential offender’s perceptions of the certainty, severity, and swiftness of punishment (Nagin 1998). First, the focus typically begins with an intense focus on specific types of crime and the offenders that are most responsible for carrying out those crimes, most of which involve gun violence. Second, the focus is often referred to as “pulling levers” strategies because they seek to apply every lever available, whether it is formal or informal. Third, which may alter objective sanction risks unlike any of the other two strategies, focus is to seek direct influence perceived sanction risks among offenders by communicating directly with them about the consequences of their