Determinism

Good Essays
According to Sider and Conee, determinism conflicts with the concept of free will. Since all events have single or multiple causes and are also caused by a prior event, the existence of free will is questioned. If a person woke up one day and felt energized, there would be a reason as to why he woke up that way and not any other way. Perhaps the reason would be that he had 12 hours of sleep, or that he woke up to a bright, sunny day. Determinism tells us that not only is there a reason why he woke up well rested, there is also a reason why he had 12 hours of sleep, such that it creates a chain of causes that leads to a time before his birth. On the contrary, if he woke up cranky, there would be a different cause, but it would still be a cause to answer why he woke up on the wrong side of the bed. This chain of causes gives him no other choice but to wake up and feel energized that day, proving that determinism and free will conflict with each other.
If all events are caused by those before it, it stems that human thoughts are also not exempt from such. All events that cause human thought are a result of prior events that
…show more content…
This belief is inconsistent with the argument for incompatibilism; the compatibilist must reject the premise that a person does not have the ability to act another way if determinism is true. A compatibilist will not agree with this premise because she believes that these factors can coexist. They are compatible to a compatibilist because their definition of a free action does not conflict with determinism. To a compatibilist, a free action means an action that comes from what a person really wants or thinks, rather than an uncaused action, which would then mean that the compatibilist also has to reject the idea of free will or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Free Will vs. Determinism

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Society walks about day-by-day living their lives and never really thinking or breaking down how their day unfolds or why it plays out the way it does. Some people have said that individuals have a choice and are able to decide on where their day goes. Others on the other hand would argue this assessment and state that your day and your life as whole are all pre determined. The different is free will vs. determinism. Do you believe we live in a free will world or has everything been planed out and is determined to happen no matter what? To start out on finding an answer to this question we must first break down the two terms and a bit about their background and what they mean to us as an individual walking around day-to-day living our lives.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The stereotypical definition of determinism, to the layman, goes something like this: "All events are predetermined so we have no free will." Actually, this is more or less the definition of hard determinism. Determinism, however, according to professor of philosophy Sandra LaFave, can co-exist with free will in the form of soft determinism, the philosophical theory that all events indeed have causes but that humans can still act voluntarily. Soft determinism provides a more widely-acceptable definition of determinism that agrees more with common usage of the words "free will" and "cause."…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much debate over the issue of whether we have complete freedom of the will or if our will caused by something other than our own choosing. There are three positions adopted by philosophers regarding this dispute: determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Determinists believe that freedom of the will does not exist. Since actions are events that have some predetermined cause, no actions can be chosen and thus there is no will to choose. The compatibilist argues that you can have both freedom of the will and determinism. If the causes which led to our actions were different, then we could have acted in another way which is compatible with freedom of the will. Libertarians believe that freedom of the will does exist.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hard Determinist argument appears to be in conflict with whether we act freely rather than “free will” or our ability to make choices. Using a thought experiment I will attempt to explain the different between acting freely…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussing a theory one must start with some data in order to prove the validity of the theory, and in discussing determinism this is no different. Two suitable criteria dealing with the decision making process are: firstly that we at times deliberate with the view of making a decision , and secondly regardless of whether I deliberate I sometimes have a personal choice in the decision making process. These criteria are ideal because they are both things that we as individuals are fairly certain of so any acceptable theory must account for them in some way. For common sense, a virtue in argumentation, suggests that it is easier to accept the veracity of partial self-determination in the decision making process than an abstract philosophical theory. To asses the applicability of the data to determinism a more in depth examination of determinism is needed, which Taylor defines as having three tenets: Firstly, that the theory of determinism is true. Secondly, that voluntary behaviour is free unless constrained, and finally that causes of voluntary behaviour are certain states, condition, decisions, and desires. The principle problem of determinism is precisely this last tenet, for what are the causes of the inner states that cause my actions? Where do they come…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To consider the extent to whether free will is compatible with Determinism, you must first think about whether or not we actually possess free will in the first place. A Hard Determinist would say that individuals are not free to act upon anything as it is like a path set up by other natural factors in which we have no control over, this leads to the conclusion that humans are not morally responsible for any action. Any moral decisions we make have causes prior that are uncontrollable. Therefore a Hard Determinist would say that free will and Determinism are not compatible with one another. On the other hand is Libertarianism, with which free will is closely compatible. Philosophers such as Kant, believe that we are completely free meaning that we are morally responsible for every action we take. Between these two extremes stands soft-determinists, such as Hume. These think that most decisions we make are the result of external factors but also we have acted upon free will to make it happen. In fact, they go so far as to say that true freedom requires causation, without this there would be randomness. Therefore free will is completely incompatible with a hard determinist, but a Soft Determinist however would argue that free will must be compatible. So a libertarian approach seems like the most convincing as it implies that we are morally responsible for our actions but takes into account the fact that external factors may have caused this.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism, and discuss in detail which you think is the most convincing position in the free will debate.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, by Sober, it mentions three views of freedom: hard determinism, libertarian, and soft determinism. Being a hard determinist means you do not have free will, an incompatibilist, and causal determinist. Libertarians are free and incompatibilist; soft determinist are people that say that we do have free will and are causal determinism. An incompatibilist has many options and is free to pick any one of the choices. A causal determinist is when events turn out the same even if you go back in time. In this essay I am going to argue that we should be hard determinist because we do not have free will to choose our genes and environment.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firstly, to speak of compatibilism, you’d have to assume that the world is deterministic, meaning that everything that happens from here on out, including human action, is caused by the facts of everything that has happened before it. With that assumption in mind, compatibilist believe that we still have free will as long as we aren’t operating under external limitations. The problem with that is that although compatibilists believe we are free, there is still disagreement on just exactly how free we may be, which is the weak spot indeterminists and incompatibilists use to try to break the argument.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem with determinism is that if there is no free will, then there is no moral responsibility, which means ours lives have less meaning. If this is the case, nothing that we do or accomplish really makes a difference. Our individuality and unique character traits disappear because someone is masterminding our lives. On the other hand, the problem with the idea of free will is that our actions are uncaused, and seem to be random. We happen to perform one action, but there is no explanation of why we performed this action instead of another.…

    • 299 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ayer argues that individuals do possess free will and individuals that make decisions voluntarily should be held responsible for their actions which goes against the theory of determinism and compatibilism. Determinism holds that individuals do not possess free will given that their actions are predetermined which prevents individuals to avoid any actions, therefore making them not morally responsible. On the other hand, compatibilism holds that both determinism and the concept of free will are both compatible and one can be a determinist and also believe in individuals possessing free will. However, Ayer argues that the fact that both of these theories state that individuals have the ability to act otherwise, that in itself demonstrates that…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Bargh, J. A. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin,126(6), 925-945. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 5069 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The question of free will vs. determinism has been debated for a long time. Some people believe humans have the capability to use free will. For many theists, free will is a gift from God. They believe that if people did not have free will then they are not morally responsible for their actions. However others argue that human’s actions are due to determinism, so if humans follow the course of natural law, it is hard to believe that actions are freely chosen. Except then the question occurs, why anything should be debated if everything is based on determinism.…

    • 5069 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discuss the apparent incompatibility between freewill and determinism. Is there a satisfactory soft determinist account of freedom? If so, what is it? If not, what is the best such account and what objections does it face?…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays