Preview

Deterioration of Education with “No Child Left Behind”

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deterioration of Education with “No Child Left Behind”
Running head: Deterioration of Education

Deterioration of Education with “No Child Left Behind”
Diane Congleton
Kaplan University
CM220-13
Professor Dorothy Hoerr, M.A.
January 17, 2009

“No Child Left Behind”: Educating the Children On January 8th, 2002, the no child left behind (NCLB) act was signed into law. The NCLB was pushed through, by the Bush Administration, to help all children make it through school no matter what. The "No Child Left Behind," law assumes that all children learn at the same pace and in the same way. Does this help the children it was meant to or are we just hurting them? We should be listening to what the teachers say about this act, for they are the individuals that can see first hand the effects this act has had on our children. Changes must be made for the sake of the children and their futures.

When the NCLB first came about the intentions were great. According to the United Stated Department of education the NCLB was to be “based on stronger accountability for results, more freedom for states and communities, proven education methods, and more choices for parents” (2004). As a result of the NCLB every student enrolled in a public school is required to take an annual standardized test from third through eighth grade, and once in high school. Students are then broken up in to specific groups, such as "African-American" and "economically disadvantaged." As researched on the NEA (National Education Association) website, each group (including special education students) now must have a passing rate of 95 percent and by 2014 that percentage should increase to 100 percent. NCLB therefore, forces the teachers to lower and/or alter their primary educational goals by enforcing standardized tests which must be reported to measure their AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress). If schools do not meet the requirements, then the school is put on the "needs improvement" list and the district gives students the option of transferring to a



References: Beaver, William (2004).Can "no child left behind" work?. American Secondary Education. 32, 3-18. Lehrer, J. (2007). Effectiveness of No Child Left Behind Debated [Electronic Version]. Online NewsHour. Retrieved November 24, 2007 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/jan-june07/nclb_04-03.html NEA: No Child Left Behind - ESEA - NEA Position. Retrieved December 01, 2008, from NEA: National Education Association http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html No Child Left Behind. (2007). Retrieved December 1,2008, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=ln U.S. Department of Education:No Child Left Behind. (n.d.) Retrieved December 15, 2008, http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=pb

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darling-Hammond uses logos very strongly and acknowledges that the NCLB Act was created to help American children succeed educationally. She doesn’t fully bash the law without implementing clear ideas and alternatives as to what the government should consider to do next in order to effectively make our education system stronger after her criticisms’. She asks the rhetorical question, “What happened?” Not only does this tell us that she was baffled with the outcome of what came to be of this law, but that clearly, it took a complete180 degree turn from what she and others thought it would. She says, “ …high-profile Republicans are expressing their disenchantment with the NCLB, while many newly elected democrats are seeking a major overhaul as well.” She purposely wrote this to show that many people- regardless of political party- are not in favor of this law. What Darling- Hammond claims is that the NCLB Act backfired and left more negative effects schools than positive ones. She expresses that “… the law has been protested by more than twenty states and dozens of school districts that have voted to resist specific provisions.” Clearly stating that despite all…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lets first start by explaining what the Act entails. As defined by Wikipedia, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), more commonly known as NCLB, is a United States federal law signed on January 8, 2002 by George Bush, that reauthorizes a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for state, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. NCLB is built on four principles: accountability for results, more choices for parents, greater local control and flexibility, and an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research. Additionally, it promotes an increased focus on reading and re-authorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). NCLB is the latest federal legislation which enact the theories of standards-based education reform, which is based on the belief that high expectations and setting of goals will result in success for all students. Under the new law, every racial and demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math tests to make "adequate yearly progress." This Act tests reading and math skills of…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    No Child Left Behind

    • 5087 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The purpose of No Child Left Behind is to close the achievement gap and to make sure that all children learn their math and reading by 2014. The law tries to accomplish this hefty goal by implementing different tactics. One of them is to have stronger accountability in the schools. In order to achieve this goal they use standardized tests to see how well the schools are teaching all of the students, with specific emphasis on students who are disadvantaged, like poor students or minority students. They divide the students into subgroups according their ethnic backgrounds and wealth and give them the tests. The tests are supposed to show how well the students are doing learning their basic skills such as math and reading. In theory, the school can then identify those students who are falling behind and focus more attention and resources on them. The schools then test the students again in order to determine if there was any improvement in their basic skills. If there is no improvement in two years the school system must provide other alternatives for the children. For example, the school system must pay for the…

    • 5087 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, President George W. Bush's education reform bill, was signed into law on Jan. 8, 2002. The No Child Left Behind Act says that states will develop and apply challenging academic standards in reading and math. It will also set annual progress objectives to make sure that all groups of students reach proficiency within 12 years. And the act also says that children will be tested annually in grades 3 through 8, in reading and math to measure their progress. The test results will be made public in annual report cards on how schools and states are progressing toward their objectives.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act is the Bush administration's sweeping educational reform, aimed at improving the performance of the nation's public schools by introducing accountability. Supporters of the act claim that it will increase the performance of all school children by raising the standards and allowing parents greater freedom in choosing the school they want their child to attend. The act also puts in place a system of punishment for schools if their student body does not perform to the standards set down by the National government (NCLB act). As well as increasing standards, this act also encourages teachers to use a curriculum which the government developed with "scientifically based research" (a phrase that appears 111 times in the act) (Hammond 4). While standardized curriculum and increased standards seem like they would improve children's learning, in reality it hurts them by pushing them too hard academically instead of focusing on social development, and denying them specialized attention based upon their individual abilities.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article reports the results found by a national survey taken by the state, about the national impact of the No Child Left Behind bill. Results indicate that in between 2001 and 2005 statewide assessment of science and writing increased but it decreased in the social studies, arts, humanities, and computers. The research teams found that there are few themes that come up at almost every school. The first, which is an obvious one, is that for subjects that are not tested for under the No Child Left Behind bill, the schools reduced their resources and the effort that the school puts into these areas dropped. Second, is an interesting method because they take material away from tested subjects and integrating them into the classes that are not tested for. Just so the teachers that are going to be tested have more time to focus on the testing material. The last theme is that there is no change observed, everything seems to be the same as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 3566 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Every parent wants to have the best education possible. State and local government have always been responsible for education from kindergarten through 12th grade. The federal; government was more for equality of education. The federal government, state and local authorities have all proposed ways to make education better for everyone. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act was proposed just for that reason. Even though it was proposed by the federal government, the states still set the standards for the testing. Since the proposal and enforcement of the act, there has been a great debate about the effectiveness; however there is data that shows the constructiveness of this act outweighs the pessimistic views.…

    • 3566 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002, is a comprehensive overhaul of the federal governments requirements of state and local education systems (www.nclb.gov). It reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and replaces the 1994 Improving Americas Schools Act.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The No Child Left behind Act is the central issue of debates in the educational arena. In wanting to provide accountability and close the achievement gaps between various sub-groups of the population, the federal government enacted NCLB in 2002.The act focuses on four pillars: stronger accountability, freedom for states and communities, proven educational methods, and more choices for parents. Since its inception, it has been surrounded by controversy. The (NCLB) divided decision makers from local school systems all the way to the federal level.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 8, 2002, President Bush signed into law the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). This law represents his education reform plan and contains changes to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) since it was enacted in 1965. It is asking America's schools to describe their success in terms of what each student accomplishes. The act contains the President's four basic education reform principles: stronger accountability for results, especially in reading, increased flexibility and local control, expanded options for parents, and teacher and staff quality.…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    opinion on the effectiveness of the No Child Left Behind Act, and that it is in fact helping…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq No Child Left Behind

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They would try to accomplish this by having annual testing in subjects such as math, and reading to see their progress over the course of the school year, and schools would face severe penalties for schools that did not meet the goal that they had set for themselves (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). By having a set of standards that the schools had to keep and having a penalty for schools that did not meet their goal, it sets a parameter that should put a focus on the quality of the education of the child, to make sure they are receiving a quality education. Going back to the penalty section of the policy, this was a good thing to have, when writing the policy. By having a penalty you out a consequence for the schools for not providing a good quality education to the students. If a school did not meet its target goal on their progress reports, students could have the option to change schools if they wished, leadership of the schools could change, or the schools could close down entirely (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). This is important to know because it showed how seriously people were taking about the…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays