Design Argument For The Existence Of God Essay
Give an account of the fundamental ideas of the Design Argument for the existence of God
The design argument explicates many fundamental ideas in order to achieve evidence for the existence of God; its ideas are concluded by scholars such as Aquinas (analogy of the archer), Paley (analogy of the watch) and Tennant (anthropic principle). They use analogies and principles to draw arguments to their conclusions to the existence of God. The argument is teleological; it aims to prove that everything that God has designed has an end and a purpose. Firstly, one of the fundamental ideas of Design argument is how an unintelligent object needs to be directed by an intelligent being. Aquinas developed the analogy of the archer; the analogy supports …show more content…
If any one component was missing human life would cease to exist. The watch didn’t just appear. We can assume that it was created by a watchmaker as it needed something intelligent to create the parts in order to carry out its function. Therefore, something intelligent must have created the universe as it could not just appear in such perfect complexity. This concludes the argument that God created the universe. Additionally, another key idea of the existence of God is that the conditions of the universe are so well suited and detailed; there must be a designer. The scholar Tennant supports the argument by using his four conditions which are known as the anthropic principle. The anthropic principle means the cosmological principle that theories of the universe are constrained by the necessity to allow human existence. Condition one state that different parts of the universe, e.g. space, gravity etc. are all necessary to make the universe work together. This means that if we didn’t have gravity we would not be able to walk or move therefore, gravity is necessary
The design argument explicates many fundamental ideas in order to achieve evidence for the existence of God; its ideas are concluded by scholars such as Aquinas (analogy of the archer), Paley (analogy of the watch) and Tennant (anthropic principle). They use analogies and principles to draw arguments to their conclusions to the existence of God. The argument is teleological; it aims to prove that everything that God has designed has an end and a purpose. Firstly, one of the fundamental ideas of Design argument is how an unintelligent object needs to be directed by an intelligent being. Aquinas developed the analogy of the archer; the analogy supports …show more content…
If any one component was missing human life would cease to exist. The watch didn’t just appear. We can assume that it was created by a watchmaker as it needed something intelligent to create the parts in order to carry out its function. Therefore, something intelligent must have created the universe as it could not just appear in such perfect complexity. This concludes the argument that God created the universe. Additionally, another key idea of the existence of God is that the conditions of the universe are so well suited and detailed; there must be a designer. The scholar Tennant supports the argument by using his four conditions which are known as the anthropic principle. The anthropic principle means the cosmological principle that theories of the universe are constrained by the necessity to allow human existence. Condition one state that different parts of the universe, e.g. space, gravity etc. are all necessary to make the universe work together. This means that if we didn’t have gravity we would not be able to walk or move therefore, gravity is necessary