Preview

Describing New Labour As A 'Warmed Up' Version Of Thatcherism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describing New Labour As A 'Warmed Up' Version Of Thatcherism
Describing New Labour as a ‘warmed up’ version of Thatcherism is a paradoxical statement in that it contains both a great deal of truth and falsehood. It is certainly true that New Labour accepted, and in some cases developed, Thatcherite ideals - namely deregulation of the economy, privatisation and limiting the powers of trade unions. It is also true that the New Labour style of government was deeply Thatcher-esk in its reliance on big business/media support, continuing the ‘presidential’ system of ruling and doing little to reverse the centralisation of power that occurred under the Tories. To the statements merit it acknowledges evidence to the contrary by describing the Labour governments of 1997-2010 as ‘warmed up Thatcherism’ (as opposed …show more content…
In describing Thatcher’s economic record as making British industry ‘more competitive’ he makes an important distinction; New Labour accepted the neoliberal economic measure of success, GDP growth⍖, largely abandoning the traditional democratic socialist view of economic success – growing equality. The United Kingdom’s GDP rose every quarter during Blair’s term in office; inequality measured by the Gini coefficient rose during Blair’s tenure as PM and hit it’s peak just a few months into Gordon Brown’s premiership. Such an economic legacy is typical of a neo-liberal/Thatcherite government during boom years (it parallels Ronald Reagan’s record in the 1980s). Furthermore, New Labour did nothing to reverse the sweeping privatisations that occurred from ‘79-97, even completing the selling of the railways, making them Thatcherite in their inaction if nothing else. It was Thatcher who deregulated the London Stock Exchange in 1986, the so called Big Bang, and under New Labour only a limited regulatory body [Financial Service Authority] was introduced - later described by Gordon Brown as a ‘big mistake’ for its ineffectiveness. Both M.T and Blair/Brown sought market based reforms, shying away from public spending wherever possible - even when New Labour followed through on traditional Labour policy, such as the injection of funds into the NHS. This was mainly done with the Conservative/Thatcherite toolkit, namely the PFI [Private Finance Initiative], a product of John Major’s spell in Number 10; during the New Labour period the PFI accounted for a staggering 75% of the funds for new hospitals. Much in the way that Clement Attlee’s government of ‘45-51 set the economic fundamentals for the Conservative governments to follow, by describing Thatcher’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Collectivism, New Right,

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The New Right approach considers the responsibility of the vulnerable to be placed upon the individuals and their families and that the state should only play a minimal role in their care. This idea was not fully challenged until the election of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government in 1979 as they believed that the state should play as smaller role as possible in welfare provision as it was mainly the responsibility of the individual and their family. The New Right saw state support to be creating a highly dependent society in which independence was dwindling. Mrs Thatcher saw welfare as producing a society which was reliant on benefits rather than a society which was…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Conservative Party which was leaded by Winston Churchill (1951-55) and Anthony Eden (1955-57) and Harold Macmillan (1957-63) between the years 1951-59 wanted, according to their manifesto in 1951, to stop all further nationalisation. The Iron and Steel Act will be repealed and the Steel industry allowed resuming its achievements of the war and post-war years. To supervise prices and development we shall revive, if necessary with added powers, the former Iron and Steel Board representing the State, the management, labour, and consumers. They also wanted to free the people from austerity and housing shortages. Macmillan introduced the stop and go economy. If the domestic consumption and the prices rose too quickly (and the economy appeared to be “overheating”) the government put on the “brakes” by increasing taxes and raising interest rates. This would make it more difficult to borrow money. The other way around would be, when the production and the exports declined, and the economy appeared to be a “downturn”, the government pressed the “accelerator” button by cutting and lowering the interest rates. This would make it easier to borrow money. There was also the “Stop-Go” approach. This approach was to try and solve the main two problems of maintaining economic growth which were keeping inflation low and making sure there was a healthy balance of payments. But this policy was not coherent. The budgets were used to buy votes and it also caused mixed success. One result was “Stagflation” (Stagnation and Inflation). It was a failure to invest in the long term R & D (Research and Development). Britain also started to lag behind because of the heavy defence expenditure and the expensive nuclear arms development programme. Also 35 per cent of the Research and Development were spent on the defence. But this face the rise in living standards (50%) and material prosperity, the wages raised ahead the pries, there was a greater availability of a credit, house buying grew…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 3rd May 1979 saw the greatest parliamentary swing since the war, with the Conservative Party polling 43.9% of the vote; thereby winning 339 seats (up 62 since the last election). It is due to these figures, therefore, that historians such as Eric Evans believe that it was the strength of the Conservatives under their new, forward-thinking leader, Margaret Thatcher that led them to victory. However, when one looks at the context of the time itself, it seems apparent, as Marr sums up, that ‘it was likely that the current social climate left the Labour Party in an unfavourable position’. In reality, it seems more likely that Labour weaknesses, particularly those of the Labour Leader James Callaghan during the Winter of Discontent, led to the huge parliamentary swing of 1979.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Conservative government saw its high and lows from the year 1979 to 1983 however overall it was a success, however this success was only due to the fact that the Conservatives brought about some extreme changes in relation to their economic policy. One of these extreme changes was Thatcher’s adoption of the monetarism. Sources 7 and 9 take into consideration the view that the Conservatives economic policy was a success in the years 1979 to 1983. Source 7 does so by complimenting the success of Thatcherism in the “expanding towns of southern England and East Anglia”. Source 9, comments on the Conservative’s success in decreasing inflation after coming into office. Source 8 directly conflicts with sources 7 and 9 as it shows figures which suggest that unemployment rates and manufacturing output have seen a rapid decrease from the year 1979 and 1984 which the years in which Margaret Thatcher served her first term as Conservative party leader. “Thatcher’s fundamental philosophy of anti-socialist economics prescribed a number of broad objectives” Her basic ideas were that the government basically had to do less in order for it to gain economic success.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tory government from 1819 to 1829 introduced a lot of social and economic reforms, which had both positive and negative effects and varied in success. The cabinet shuffle in 1822 gave the Tories a ‘liberal’ reputation as many of the successful reforms came after this; however it can be questioned whether or not they were as liberal as they seemed as a lot of their reforms had already been in production beforehand and were not actually thought of by the ‘liberal’ Tory government.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcherism comprised a mixture of ideas and policies such as free markets, privatisation of industries, low taxation and little state involvement in people’s lives. Some may argue that the conservative party today under David Cameron has drifted into a different direction from Thatcherite policies, however others say that Thatcher still has a huge influence on the modern conservative party.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Harold Macmillan said in 1957 that Britain had “never had it so good” it was easy to see why he spoke with such optimism. The period of Conservative dominance brought many benefits to the British people including the end of rationing, full employment and a boom in the economy. However, in labour’s 1964 manifesto they described this period as “thirteen wasted years”. It seems difficult to believe that both could be true and in this essay I will be assessing the successes and failures of the Conservative government during this time.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of the Economy, the Keynsian demand model that had been used up until now had failed and in danger of recession Thatcher chose to raise interest levels to reduce money supply, and therefore suppress inflation. VAT was raised significantly which hit the manufacturing industries hard, causing rising unemployment. This governmental decision was very much a further step away from a state managed economy, and seen as an attempt at emphasising free markets, with a reduced role for the state. Public service provision was rolled back substantially and previously nationalised industries, the most notable of which being British Telecom, were privatised. This was another step for the Government away from a complete welfare state, with private industry and commerce being relied on to provide many of the public services that had been Government run since the end of the war.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United Kingdom changing radically with Labour’s landslide victory , the greatest since 1945. Led by Tony Blair, the party promised an ambitious programme of constitutional reforms which they themselves claimed would lead to “the most ambitious and far reaching changes to the constitution undertaken by any government in this century” (Hazell, Sinclair, 1999, p42)These reforms were also pioneered by Gordon Brown when he became Blair’s successor in 2007. While some of these amendments were successfully implemented others were abandoned or were watered down greatly. Also, the planned reversal of many of these reforms and other amendments made by the recent coalition Government must also be deliberated , however, as the coalition Government has only been in in power two years it is harder to see if they have had any real effect yet . Therefore this essay will focus on the constitutional reforms made by New Labour and will discuss that while they have made a difference, the impact has been limited and far less radical than they first proposed.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Labour Government came in to power in a ‘Landslide’ election victory. The Government was led by Clement Atlee and introduced reforms. The reforms were in Social Security, Health, Housing, Education and Employment.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parallels can be drawn between Cameron and his predecessor, Margaret Thatcher: Cameron is a supporter of the free market economy; has voiced his support of foreign investment; supports a competitive market which brings benefits like jobs and cheaper prices. Cameron has spoken publicly about the need for the free market economy and said that they were the “best imaginable force for improving human wealth and happiness”.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labour party was founded on the principles of social democracy, which is a traditionally centre left ideology. It has been Britain’s major democratic socialist party since the 20th century and since then has been committed on basing its ideologies on advancement for the working class. Until the 1980’s, Labour had kept its principles consistent, but with the development of Michael Foot’s ‘loony left’ movement which was based largely around the irrational minority issues and racial problems. It was Tony Blair in 1994 that came through with a revised ‘new-labour’ ideology that helped dominate the election polls yet again and stay victorious until 2010. But, did new-labour still resemble old-labour in terms of its principles? This is what i aim to evaluate.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thatcherites were extremely traditional in their view of the constitution and political system. Modern conservatives now accept that constitutional reform is essential and that the political system needs a good deal of democratic renewal. Although tax cuts are part of the ‘Cameron agenda’ in the long run, the modern party accepts that tax cutting should not be part of a dogmatic ideology, but instead should only be undertaken when the economic conditions are favourable. In general Cameron’s Conservative party is more adaptable and pragmatic, whereas Thatcherism was a more fixed, dogma with fixed principles. There are, however, several points which could be seen as ways in which the modern Conservative Party retains some Thatcherite ideas…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Notes

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During 1964 to 1970, The Labour government planned to create a ‘New Britain’ under the leadership of Harold Wilson. The most important successes of the Labour government include education, social freedoms and the freedoms of women. However, the most important failures of labour included its lack of the scientific minds in the party and its failure of large economic and technological advancement.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays