Preview

Descartes Third Meditation Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Third Meditation Essay
Descartes Principle In the Third Meditation, Descartes believes that he is was created by God and God is an infinite being. He mentions as one of his proofs that “there must be at least as much formal reality in the cause of an idea as there is objective reality in the idea itself.” Many people would not know what this means. It means that anything that causes an idea must be at least as actual as what the idea is about. For example, if i have an idea that my house is red, the cause of my idea would have to be at least actual as a red house. He believes in that quote as a proof because thats what he uses for his argument that he was created by God. He knows God is infinite and nothing more than God. An infinite being cannot have flaws and …show more content…
He uses “I” as his thing. Therefore from this proof that there must be a thinking thing having that idea. That is how he proves his own existence in Meditation 2. That is principle he gains knowledge of himself. So how does he gain knowledge of God existing? He uses the same pattern as he does in Meditation 3 to prove God is his creator. That is how he believes what he believes in Meditation 3 from the proof of Meditation 2. The premise is the thing that represents something and the conclusion must be something causing that idea. I believe on his proofs of himself existing and God existing. I believe it because believe God is real. It is just plain and simple as that. I do not believe in the evolution topic and I am not an atheist so i believe God exist and is my creator. Also, it makes sense on what he saying because it is all in your thought. If you think that infinite being thought God was real than he will be real. But you are thinking that so your idea is true and actual. Which concludes God exists. To me it is all in the head and the thoughts of what you believe. It depends on the person and what they believe. It is an idea coming from their head and what they think. I believe his argument is valid and God

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum112 Assignment 1:Essay

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This surprise is first revealed after three paragraphs of Descartes debating the truth of his own existence between the conscious awake times and the unconscious dream times and the relationship to things in nature. According to Descartes (1636), “In thinking it is necessary to exist” and “that all things which we very clearly and distinctly conceive are true.” It is at that point that his focus turns to describing the proof of existence of God as the creator of all imperfect things.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument for the existence of God is the basic design argument. It states that: the world has purpose and order, the complexity of the universe shows evidence of design, such design needs a designer, the only designer of something as great as the universe is God. This provides evidence for the existence of God as natural objects, such as the human eye, are so complex that the chance of them occurring randomly are so minute that it is much more likely that the eye had a designer. This is because each individual part of the eye must be the exact right size and in a specific condition to be able to function at all. A designer who is capable of designing something so detailed must be omnipotent – no question. The only possible being who is able to create something so divine must be God. Therefore the Basic argument shows evidence for the existence of God.…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is not a sound argument because he is clearly contradicting himself. God is supposed to be the designer of the universe. Only something extremely complex would be able to create the universe and Cleanthes says if things are complex then they were created and did not just appear. Taking from his own view, this means that God could not have just appeared and was created by another intelligent creator. Now, some people might say then that there is nothing else before God.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So this argument is not good against the God existence. There are also some problems about the words used in this argument like- marvellous, incredible, formidable, merit etc. He should use words like greatness, greatest etc. We can give the example- let us take the premise 1 and use greatest in place of marvellous. World is the greatest achievement imaginable is more plausible than world is the marvellous achievement imaginable.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which in part, is a true atheist claim. They like to use science and the details of science to argue why the Lord is imaginary, and why religion is fictitious. While I wanted to brush off what he said and keep on with my faith, it inevitably made me question my faith slightly, and challenged me. When he said Christians essentially “invent allies in the sky” (576). It made me question my belief because I grew up with the belief in the Lord.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    exist. He says that anyone who has an understanding of the existence of God can and logically…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They break down their argument into three different components, “Some contingent beings exist. If any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. Therefore there exists a necessary being” (Pg. 70). They explain that an infinite series is evidence to prove the contingent being exists. This presents an idea that there is no final explanation to this cause. To argue the statement by some atheist that claim that the world has always existed, they say that they do not make any claims about how old the universe which explains a universe that may have always…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The example of the apple that was discussed in class is a good example of this claim. A person can understand that an apple contains seeds which can grow into an apple tree. The tree can then produce apples, continuing the cycle of causes for the creation of the apple. The fact that this cycle can be thought to go on for a long time, but the cause of the first apple had to start at some point. By this observation, a person can determine on their own that whatever created the first apple or apple seed is greater than what created it, what caused it is what is considered God.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, many atheist and agnostic individuals in modern times show that the point does not hold up for everyone, which the argument states as one of its points. God is not inherent in everyone, so God is not self-evident in this way or naturally implanted in many…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The arguments he stated has successfully convinced me that there is in fact a God, the arguments put forth establishes specific truths….. Namely that whatever we think of and see as truth is in fact so because God exists and everything in us is because of him.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCloskey claims that “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed.” He is implicating that we as humans do not have the full understanding or knowledge of everything about creation. Again, based on anyone arguments, he nor I can prove God, no God, or why everything is here. Even he stated in his article that if people accept the examples of purpose and design we would only be entitled to believe that there is a “powerful” “designer.” Everything he claims to be a weak argument for reasons to believe in God can be turned around towards his arguments. As said earlier I cannot prove God but believe there are many good reasons to rather than not to. He wants indisputable examples (which sounds like proof) of God. While he pushes for evolution that supposedly has undisputable proof. There is problem with this, there is no proof of the first organism or a pattern of evolvement. There is no foundation for this belief of a first organism. Only a theory based on similarity amongst organism. There is nothing that shows clearly an evolving species. If we all evolved why isn’t there any in-between species? Just similar between two completely different. His argument is not reasonable.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analogical Design

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This argument is very easy for most people to understand. It basically states that the universe was put together in such a way that a magnificent being is behind it. That magnificent being would be God. This planet was put together like a machine. Everything plays into one another. For example: the water cycle. The water evaporates from the body of water here on Earth. Then there is condensation and it rains, which is also known as precipitation, and then the collection of water goes back into the lakes, rivers and oceans; where it starts over again. This water cycle plays in part with the plant life and the food chain. Without this water cycle there would not be plants. Without plants there would not be any food for the animals and therefore no food for humans. Who created these life cycles? They were created as if they were to play off of one another to keep the Earth going.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If the universe has never had a starting point, it means that the number of events in the history of the universe is infinite. But the number of past events must be limited. Therefore, the series of events in the past can not go back to the endless, the existence of the universe must have a beginning. Scientists have to face the origin of the universe, it will be inexplicable. So the existence of God is inevitable. Even though a supporter of the big bang theory, if he is an atheist, he must at least have to believe that the universe is out of nothing. But it must be unreasonable! Nothing can be made out of nothing. This will have to believe in the presence of God. This argument provides a belief in…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the beginning of the third meditation, Descartes seeks to establish the existence of God using his initial concept of self awareness. Descartes argued that because he thought, then he lived. Thinking ability at this time was linked to being alive and thought that there must be a god who puts the thoughts in his mind. In his quest for indubitable truth, Descartes came up with the theory of ideas, which classified those things that he considered distinct and clear to be true. Descartes argued that the idea of god should be coming from within him since he cannot experience god himself directly or find any perfection in himself.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One objection to this argument can be found in line 3, per Saint Thomas' account of omnipotence which states that God is omnipotent by definition, that for any logically possible state of affairs, it is possible for God to bring something about.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays