Preview

Descartes Prove That God Exist

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Prove That God Exist
Philosophers have contemplated for thousands of years the purpose of reason and what it is good for. Three philosophers specifically have tried to prove that their theory is the best they are Descartes, Epictetus, and Leibniz. Descartes believes that reason is good for proving God exists and reason shows us we exist. Epictetus believes that reason is useful for proving what good actually is and that reason gives us freedom. Leibniz believes reason is good because it proves the existence of God and helps prove that our universe did not form by accident. Descartes believes that reason is good for proving that God exists. He starts proving this by saying that everyone has an idea of infinity. But he says that how do we have any idea of infinity …show more content…
Descartes believes that without God we would not be able to come up with such an idea of infinity because it cannot exist because the only thing that is infinite is God. Descartes says specifically, “Indeed I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is, God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (Descartes 1730). Now some skeptics may say that people have developed this idea on their own without the intervention of any God. But Descartes would still have something to say to that. Descartes would tell the skeptics that nothing in this world created by humans is perfect. There is always room for improvement and Descartes believes that we can think of things in our minds that are perfect like a heaven and even though we cannot grasp it or make it happen on Earth Descartes believes that God put this idea in our heads. Descartes says, “God, I say, that same being the idea of whom is in me: a being having all those perfections that I cannot comprehend, but can somehow touch with my thought, and a being subject to no defects whatever” (Descartes 1743). This argument would still be very prevalent …show more content…
Leibniz starts by saying that everything that happens and everything that is has a reason. He believes this because we can look at anything and trace back exactly why something is the exact way that it is and Leibniz believes that the furthest we can trace everything back to is God. Leibniz says, “This real entity must be necessary, otherwise yet another cause must be sought outside it to explain why it exists rather than does not exist, which is contrary to the hypothesis. This entity is the ultimate reason for the existence of things, and is usually referred to by a single word, ‘God’” (Leibniz 2695). What he is trying to say here is when people try and figure out how things originated and how everything came to be we usually refer to God and he believes that we think God is the creator of everything. Now this is where some people will present the argument that they believe that the world was created by science or the “big bang theory” this is where Leibniz presents the second half of his argument where he says, “And it follows as a principle to which there can be no exceptions that the world is a cosmos, ornamented through and through; in other words, that it is constructed in such a way as to give the maximum satisfaction to an intelligent being” (Leibniz 2723). This is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Descartes, like the crew on the Nebuchadnezzar, has faith that a divine being is the author of the universe. But he asks: “...who can give me the assurance that this God has not arranged that there should be no earth, no heaven,…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hum 112 assigment 1

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He realized that human were imperfect but that we also had a form of perfection in us from God, thus, giving us the ability to attain certain thoughts and ideas. Another wow factor for me that Descarte mentioned was when he said that if there were any other intelligences or natures that weren’t perfect, they would have to be totally dependent on God power to stay alive or even be part of existence. The reason this surprised me was because this is something that many people never think about or they do not want to have in consideration. People are always doubting where they come from and why we are here, but never really put these two things together. If it were not for God, we would never even be here! But this thought is for people that believe that God is the creator. I believe that the surprise ending was when Descartes realized that God is perfect and he was made to see this by God. Descartes state that “God is perfect and his ideas were…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin with, Descartes asserts that because (P1) “I know that everything which I clearly and distinctly understand is capable of being created by God so as to correspond exactly with my understanding of it” (p. 16), and…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm and from Gaunilo. Descartes has two distinct arguments, The Perfect Argument and The Infinite Argument. Descartes two arguments can be interchangeably used because the two arguments are the same except on uses the words ‘perfect’ and ‘imperfect’, while the other uses ‘infinite’ and ‘finite’. Descartes first starts by finding what the idea of ‘perfection’ and in his second argument ‘infinite’. Descartes then wonders where these ideas came from.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This gives an insight into why Descartes relies so heavily on the God in his meditations. It seems he uses God to support his meditations and uses God as a solution to his philosophy of doubt. God is vital as he is the answer to Descartes’ most complex ideas on doubt and enables him to preach God’s ability to relieve us of doubt but further more he want to reveal to us that God is the reason for all matter , for our…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this sense, God is perfect, and would never allow deception and error to take place because they are imperfect and God consists only of perfect qualities. God would not allow one to be deceived because he is supremely good, therefore deception and error must be a result of another source. He says that if his origin is from something other than God, he could have easily created him so that he makes mistakes and until he finds his origin doubt is going to occue. Descartes supposes that God is just a tale so he says let us just fraction him out of the equation entirely. Descartes decides that he is just going to doubt everything based on two principles. The first being that everything should be doubted at some point by those who seek the truth and the second being that things that are considered doubtful should be treated as if they are false. With that in mind he concludes that he does exist even against all doubts because the Evil Genius can never say that Descartes is non-existent because he thinks he is something therefore he must be. I think, therefore I…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. For Thomas philosophy is ancilla theologiae (handmaiden of theology). Aquinas was first and foremost a theologian, though he was quite capable of distinguishing philosophy proper from theology. He held that…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm used the Ontological Argument to prove that God’s existence is necessary. The origins of this argument are found in Anselm’s writings, he began with a quotation from a Psalm “The fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God’…” and then reflected on the truthfulness of this. Anselm defined God as ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’ assuming you accept this a priori definition Anselm went on to state that anyone who denies God’s existence is a fool. He observed that it is greater to exist in reality than in the mind alone (you would prefer to have a real £20 note than an imaginary one). Someone who doubts God’s existence must have a concept of God in order for them to be able to reject it therefore if the concept of God is the greatest conceivable being then he must exist. He argued that existence was part of perfection, so if God is the greatest being (with all perfections) then it is necessary that he exists otherwise he cannot be the greatest conceivable being and that is not – to Anselm – the definition of God, the very fact that we can conceive of him as the greatest being proves, for Anselm, that he exists. For Anselm someone who denies God’s existence is essentially saying “God, who exists, does not exist”.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes vs. Aquinas

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I found Descartes’ way of thinking very interesting when compared to Aristotle. Descartes doubts the existence of God when he decides to start over and completely ignore his senses. He states in his third meditation, “…and I do not yet even know for sure whether there is a God at all…I must examine whether there is a God, and if there is, whether he can be a deceiver.” (25) Descartes makes a goal for himself to find out if there is a God and who he is. According to Aquinas we will never be able to understand who or what God is. We are finite and so we cannot understand the infinity of God. We can only know He is and always will be because He has instilled that bit of knowledge within us. So when Descartes says we cannot have the idea of finite without the idea of infinite, he claims we understand what God is. But I would disagree and take Aquinas’ side because what Descartes is understanding is not who God is entirely; it is an idea of what he is like. We as human beings, can contemplate God and try to understand what makes him, him. But since we are so limited in our knowledge, we will never comprehend our God. Later on page 32, Descartes starts to say it does not matter that he does not grasp the infinite only that he understands it. In line 47 he says he sees no reason that his knowledge cannot increase to infinity and use that infinite knowledge to understand all of the other perfections of God. This idea cannot ever happen because we humans have a beginning. God is the one who made us, but no one made God. His knowledge is truly infinite because he, himself has no beginning and no end. We on the other hand were born, will die, and though are spirits will join God in heaven, he can still choose to end our spirits existence. I began to agree with Descartes as he realizes that even if his knowledge increases more and more, it will never actually be infinite because it will never reach the point where it can no longer increase. (pg 32) I liked his quote. ” God,…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although the concept of finite existence should be preceded with some substance that is definitely infinite, this mere substance is not enough to explain the infiniteness because I am positively finite and to my understanding of God, and that he is independent, infinite, having both supreme power and intelligence. Therefore, this is a show that he cannot be able to have the ability of thinking the way he does, if it is not a fact that he is either an infinite being or an infinite being supports his thinking capacity. Although the explanation is logical, several flaws in thinking can be analyzed from the reading and understanding. I do agree with most of Descartes’ reasoning of the existence, that’s why I will not only give further clarification, but also explain Descartes biggest flaw in his argument.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophers abroad have sought out potential solutions on behalf of Descartes over the past year by almost “borrowing” various ideas he has mentioned throughout his writings, but one in particular seems very interesting for decent solution to this argument. His second set of answers or Replies to more objections Descartes brings up the topic of atheism and how they can know that three angles of a triangle are equal to two right angles (Pynn 2011). The nonbelief in God shows that God’s existence may be irrelevant and Descartes may have an issue. Descartes claims that an atheist can be clearly aware that the basics of geometry and the three angles of a triangle equaling two right angles. Therefore he states, “This awareness of his is not true knowledge since no act of awareness that can be rendered doubtful seems fit to be called knowledge.” (Pynn). He (Descartes) wants to be able to come up with a true…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Micaela Ceraso PHIL 101 Professor Papa December 9th 2014 Topic 3: The Certainty that God Is After reading the two paragraphs written by scholars I have come to three different conclusions. The author of the first argument claims that God does in fact exist and he is also infinite. The author of the second argument claims that humans are not capable of comprehending the idea of infinite, therefore we cannot argue that God is infinite or that he exists at all. Finally, Descartes claims that by The Method of Doubt, God is the one idea that cannot be doubted. Therefore, the disputed question in these three arguments is the existence of God and the idea of infinite.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to explain how a perfect and all-knowing God exists, Descartes needs to explain how such a perfect God creates human beings who are prone to error, injustice and evil. After all, a perfect and all-knowing being should have no problem creating perfect beings capable of an error free existence. In response to this criticism, Descartes posits a theory of judgement, which identifies two principle causes of human error: knowledge and free will (Meditations IV, 1-20).…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays