Preview

Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy: An Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1723 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy: An Analysis
With the human mind, body, and soul combined it is easy to be fooled into seeing and believing things that aren’t really there. We may easily see truths that are lies, and we may see lies that as truths. The world can look like everything is true at times, and other times like everything is just the opposite. There is nothing in this world a person can be too sure about, or it will turn around and deceive you. There are many road blocks and manipulations in life to question the real authenticy of not only what is right in front of you, as well as yourself and your very own thoughts. This paper will explore the depths of Descartes argument over deception and the truth that is certain in the human mind and body, along with the existence of a perfect being and of an evil genius. In Descartes’s Meditations on First Philosophy, he doubts everything he possibly knows to be true in this world. We rely entirely on our senses to perceive the world, therefore we believe them fully. But to Descartes our senses cannot be trusted entirely, he explains that our senses have been known to deceive us constantly if we take a step back and recognize it. First, to explain this he calls into doubt …show more content…
Once the truths are no longer paid attention to, they are able to be filled back with doubt making him skeptical if the evil genius made him accredit these ‘truths’ in the first place. His next venture was to find the existence of a perfect God so these truths will constantly be protected without doubt. In this theory Descartes describes that the God must be perfect if He exists, and if this is so He must exist because it is more perfect to be existing than to not be existing at all. Descartes goes on to explain that because we have an idea of God in our mind’s thoughts, we therefore cannot be the creator of ourselves or else we would have been made perfectly in the first

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Thus, they can be called into doubt. He is aware that if something deceives you at least one time, it will again, and therefore it cannot be trusted. This is evident when he states, “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; and it is a mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even once” (14). This statement proves that Descartes believes that his senses’ reliability can be called into question. For example, he states that our senses are not always accurate when it comes to perceiving small and distant objects, because we may mistake a fly on the wall for a smudge if we do not look at it from a close enough distance. By doing this, Descartes discredits the first claim he makes, which says that you must believe what your senses tell you. Therefore, he has discovered that he cannot rely on his senses for his intended philosophical foundation upon which he wishes to build his…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. Why is it important to Descartes to determine as early as possible whether God exists and is a deceiver?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes begins Meditations on First Philosophy by explaining his basic purpose and how he plans on going about accomplishing this project. Descartes hopes to discover truth and justify human knowledge and belief. In order to find the fundamental truths of life, Descartes believes he must start from scratch so that he may discern truth from false beliefs. All of Descartes' beliefs, everything he has learned and grown to believe is now cast under the shadow of doubt, as he explains to us, "I will attack straightaway those principles which supported everything I once believed" (14). Descartes further explains the task which he faced as he says, "I had to raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations, if I wanted to establish anything firm and lasting in the sciences" (13).…

    • 2451 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The meditator concludes that, he is certain of things he was able to doubt in Meditation I. When in doubt of things one can use intellect or memory to be certain in the world.42 Descartes also notes, our memory can dismiss any doubt we have about the Dream Argument.43 Experiences that happen why you are awake are connected through memory, where dreams happen as a disconnect. Descartes is certain God is not a deceiver, which makes him safe from error.…

    • 5433 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Study Guide

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The aim of Descartes’ first meditation is to first rid the mind of opinion and to only believe what is true. The second goal of his is to begin to put sciences on a firm foundation. He plans on achieving these goals by using a methodological doubt process in which he will see if he can discover a basis or corrosive agent that can bring all his beliefs into doubt. He believes that once a belief can be doubted, all…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the Evil Demon doubt.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Descartes work he mentions that our senses are not to be trusted, for they have deceived us once and surely will deceive us again. As he clearly stated in his meditation, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and certain I have learned either from the senses or through the senses; it is sometimes proved to me that these senses are deceptive, and it is wiser not to trust entirely…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his Fourth Meditation, Descartes approaches the problem of human mistakes and ultimately reconciles this with the existence of a non-deceiving God. He takes issue with the notion of God, being perfect, creating in him an imperfection – that is, the capacity to make mistakes. Mistakes, according to Descartes, arise when we are mistaken or deceived about a truth. But God is not a deceiver; and given that God has given humans the ability to judge, it doesn’t follow that he should give us the ability to be deceived in a judgement. Descartes discovers mistakes as a fault in ourselves, and not in God – he claims that though God gave us the faculties of intellect and of will, it is our incorrect use of these that causes us to make mistakes. Error,…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes’ method of doubt is a method of being skeptical about the truth of beliefs. It aims to find things that cannot be doubted…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays