Preview

Descartes Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
327 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Essay
Descartes Essay

Descartes believes that humans are comprised of the mind and the body. Despite the fallibility of his thoughts and knowledge, and despite his notion that God might be in control over everything in his life, he believes that he has total control of his own mind and body. Descartes asserts that reality is true because he has control over his body and that what he does is his own decision. To further solidify this, he uses the example of dreaming. Descartes differentiates dreams from reality by stating that the improbability of the events, as well as the lack of any sensory feelings such as touch, disprove any notion that dreams could be reality. Dreams occur in the mind, completely independent of the body. Descartes claims that God could be deceiving him into believing in this physical reality, when everything known and believed could actually be a dream world created and implicated by God.

To say that dreams occur only in the mind, separate from the physical world where the body remains, is a problematic assertion. According to Descartes, the mind and body are what humans are comprised of. Using dreams as an example, he shows that he believes that the two exist on different planes. On the contrary, I believe that the mind and body work together on the same plane. The body obeys the mind in the same way that the tide obeys the moon. The mind and body work together to accomplish things such as moving and conveying thoughts. Thoughts exist primarily in the mind and take physical form through the spoken word and by putting a pen to paper. Returning to the example of dreams, Descartes believes that they exist separately from the body. I argue that dreams can exist physically; there are times when people speak, move, and/or walk in their sleep. In conclusion, the mind and the body exist on the same plane and work together in every human.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Descartes' dream argument comes off to me is that we cannot fully trust our senses especially with the difference of dreaming and being awake. Descartes did state that he could be dreaming things since he was fooled into believing he was awake in the past. This argument goes on to say that their isn't an actual way to tell if you are dreaming or if you're awake. Since from Descrates' point of view we are not sure what is real and what is an actual dream in that our senses can be easily fooled into believing whatever the mind wants us to believe.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another philosophical reference found in the Matrix is the work of René Descartes. He is responsible for Cartesian coordinates, a system that specifies each point uniquely in a plane by a pair of numerical coordinates, and the phrase, “I think, therefore I am.” In his book Meditations on First Philosophy, he poses the question of how we can know that the world we experience daily is not an illusion being forced upon us by an evil demon. Because we believe what we see and feel when we are dreaming, how can we trust that our senses will tell us when we are no longer dreaming. If senses cannot provide us with proof that the world we live in actually exists, then senses are unreliable and that for all we know, the world might be under the control…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1). Descartes was the first recognized philosopher in recent times to attempt to question everything that could rationally be doubted. Cogito or Cogito ergo sum, is the Latin translation for Descartes famous claim ‘I think therefore I am.’ This is a pivotal part of the argument for existence that he gives in the Meditations. It is the first thing he says we can know for definite after doubting the existence of everything else. He says we must doubt everything because there is a chance that we are all being deceived by an evil demon so everything we believe to be true could just be an illusion. The Matrix is an interesting movie because it exemplifies the very basic questions of philosophy. The existence of human beings, the reality of the world we live in, and the questions of the human and mind as one logically operating in reality.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the second meditation Descartes discusses analyzing a fresh piece of wax examining its physical attributes “... it still tastes of honey and has the scent of the flowers from which the honey was gathered; its colour, shape and size are plain to see; it is hard, cold and can be handled easily…” (Descartes). He then imagine it placed within a fire noticing all its physical attributes change the wax loses its fragrance, colour, and shape; it now has become soft, warm and cannot be easily handled. However, Descartes is still able to identify it as wax. Even though his sight would perceive the wax as a completely different substance if it completely liquified it could be mistaken for some type of oil or even water. The assumption would remain…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, let us examine the argument more closely. Descartes says in his readings that the knowledge that we have of this world could be all just an illusion due to the fact that we can never really be sure that we are not sleeping – that is the main point of the dream argument. We have all had dreams that have certainly seemed and felt real, so how can we be sure that we are not sleeping and dreaming this very moment? The arguments against it would include the pinch test, the EEG, which measures brain activity while one is asleep, and one that says that if we can remember how or why we got to where we are, if we can trace our steps, then surely we must not be sleeping. All good arguments, but none of them disproves the argument for dreaming as I will prove in the subsequent paragraphs.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes establishes that in order to know what in fact exists, one must first take everything off the table and then see what can be put back. The conclusion is that in order to be certain that one is a thinking thing; one must know what it takes to be certain. “All those things I perceive very clearly and very distinctly are true”(Pg. 53). This general rule however, requires that all doubt must be removed. This can only be done if God both exists and is not a deceiver. Descartes then breaks substances down into those that have objective reality and those with formal reality. It is clear that the idea of God must have more objective reality than formal reality. However, the idea itself is so great that Descartes believes that he could not have come up with it by himself. Since he himself is a finite substance, it is assumed that something infinite would be the only thing that could envision the idea of the infinite in the first place. Therefore, God must exist and cannot be a deceiver because he would not allow Descartes to not be able to clearly and distinctly perceive. This argument then rests on Descartes proof of the existence of God, which can only be erroneous if Descartes clarity and distinctness rule is incorrect. Since the argument of God is used for the validation of the clarity and distinctness rule, and the rule itself implicitly must prove that God exists, the Cartesian circle is created. For an argument to be circular, one of the premises must be reliant upon the conclusion for its truth. If you touch on one argument, you touch on both. There are a few ways out of the circle.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes claims in his Discourse on Method that our dreams and conscious thoughts are untrue, but is this truly the case? Because of these questions of existence, it seems like, if Descartes’s arguments are taken a certain way, his arguments might be taken to imply that our lives are just a dream. Are we living in a universal soap opera directed by the Divine, and the question of who shot J.R. will never be resolved because we will all wake on Judgment Day from the dream of existence? If we are questioning existence, how can we know that our lives are just dreams? Descartes says in marginal 32 that “[…] the same thoughts we have while awake can come to us also while we are sleeping, without there being any that are then true […],” which…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes was a part of the dream argument. The Dream Argument was “proof” that the sense should not be fully trusted when distinguishing reality from illusions. Descartes…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Principle In the Third Meditation, Descartes believes that he is was created by God and God is an infinite being. He mentions as one of his proofs that “there must be at least as much formal reality in the cause of an idea as there is objective reality in the idea itself.” Many people would not know what this means. It means that anything that causes an idea must be at least as actual as what the idea is about.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes views in the Second Meditation is that he tries to clarify the nature of the human mind and how it is better known than the body. He has this theory of we’re just “existing” as in we’re just dreaming or being deceived by an evil demon of some sort. With that happening, he still concludes that we can imagine, hear, and see things. Although our sensory perceptions can be false, they’re still a part of our mind and our thinking. Descartes believes we should doubt our senses because they cannot be trusted and that you also cannot trust your imagination.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes wishes to dismiss anything that can be doubted because he wishes to find a true foundation in which to build beliefs on. Using skepticism Descartes can find something beyond doubt to build true beliefs on. By doing so he hoped that his rationale would be accepted by the popular school of thought at the time known as “Scepticism” as well as those who, for Descartes, falsely believed in Aristotelian physics. From there Descartes can use their logic to appeal to the skeptics and ultimately persuade them away from their own mistaken beliefs at the same time. To go about doing this Descartes uses the Meditations in which a fictional meditator can illustrate the process of meditation to come to a rationalization of truth about reality. This meditator is used as a narrative illustration so that people can resonate by with the meditator by following his logical thought process and thereby use the Meditations to come to the same realizations. In doing so Descartes attempts to illustrate the most extensive logical conclusion if using skepticism properly to its most explicit nature. Particularly, that knowledge gained from sensory experience can be doubted and ultimately even thought can be nothing more than a deception. In this case, in Meditations 1, Descartes uses the dreaming argument to break down the very foundations of any and all beliefs gained via sensory experience. The First Meditation is used to begin in a position the Aristotelian philosophers would agree with by claiming that the meditators most certain beliefs come from the senses. From there he used the Meditations to subtly break down the foundations for beliefs gained by sensory experience. In doing so Descartes’ meditator is able to fend off all challengers to his skeptical argument and thus seduce people away from Aristotelian beliefs by showing that they often mislead us and can thus be doubted.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deception does not seem to line up with the universal idea that God is good.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I think, therefore I am"

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes felt that that the power of thinking or sensing has nothing to do with the physical body. If he could cease all thinking than he could cease to exist. A thing that thinks is "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses"(Descartes 20). There is a clear separation between the mind and the body. If the body exists, it does not mean the "I" exist. The mind is something that is thinking, indivisible, and non-extended while the body is something that is non-thinking, divisible and extended. He believes in the standard of perfection, which must be separate from his mind because of the imperfection in his thinking.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays