Preview

Descarte's causal argument

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
723 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descarte's causal argument
Outline and discuss the causal argument.

Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.

Desartes begins this argument with the causal principle. This principle states that there must be at least as much reality in the effcient and total cause as in the effect of the cause. Therefore a cause is essential for an effect, meaning that a cause must have as much reality as an effect if not more.

Descartes then applies this principle to ideas. He establishes 2 realities; formal reality and objective reality. Formal reality refers to that what makes an object, what the object is made of. Formal realities can be any of the hierarchy of being- infinite substance, finite substance and mode. For instance the formal reality of a bag is finite, thus a bag is a finite substance. Objective reality refers to ideas only. It is therefore the formal reality of the thing representing the idea. Lets take “ the idea of a bag”. All ideas have the formal reality of a mode therefore its formal reality is that of a mode. On the other hand, the objective reality of “the idea of a bag” is a finite substance. This is because a bag in itself is a finite substance and because it is an idea, its objective reality is finite. Hence it maybe understood that only ideas of things can have objective realities; a bag (for example) in itself can only have a formal reality while the idea of a bag (for example) can have both formal reality and objective. Descartes henceforth distinguishes between formal and objective realities as previously stated.

This then leads Descartes to put the causal principle and ideas together, establishing causal principle ideas. Descartes asks if the cause of the idea of something can be a mode. As stated above, the cause of an effect must have more reality that the effect itself. An idea

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To build on this, Descartes describes people as having a finite level of reality because of our imperfect knowledge (Descartes, 2007, p.15). Although Descartes has a finite degree of formal reality, he could not have gotten the idea from himself. Consequently, having an idea of infinite would have to be a cause that is more perfect in reality than the idea (Descartes, 2007, p.13). This provides a bridge that endorses Descartes to infer the existence of causes from the nature of the distinct ideas in the mind, and thus are effects of some causes or another. So, Descartes states, “I couldn’t exist with the nature that I have, containing within the me the idea of god- if God didn’t really exist” (Descartes, 2007, p.17) arguing that God exists because he has an idea of God. And since Descartes knows that he himself is an imperfect being, he could not have invented the idea of God himself because he has less reality than God. God is the only one who is competent to create the idea of God because God has infinite reality, there must exist a perfect being out there. Descartes also reveals that God is not a deceiver. Descartes knows that a perfect being has no…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume vs Kant Causality

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to go beyond the objects of human reason, Hume proposed that reasoning was based upon cause and effect. Causal relations help us to know things beyond our…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descarte's Analogy

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the light of the fact that it definitely demonstrated its point that regardless of what we dream and the scenes that a painter might paint it is based on what we experience in reality. Descartes additionally utilizes this Painter’s Analogy to validate himself that the things which he is encountering are based on its own existence. Without the existence of things, that thinks about he would not have thought about it. More importantly, he himself would not have considered himself that he exists. Just because he is thinking about things cause him to believe himself with certainty that he exists. The concept he uses to identify his existence is notable as “Cogito Ergo…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Fourth Meditation”, titled Truth and Falsity, Descartes has proved the certain existence of only two things: the existence of himself, as a “thinking thing, which is not extended in length, breadth or height”, and the idea of God (37). To prove God’s existence, Descartes’ puts forth that: 1) our idea of a god is a perfect being, 2) it is more perfect to exist, than to not exist, 3) therefore, God must exist. Take a Pegasus for example, which is, simply, a horse with wings. A perfect Pegasus is one, which exists; this is because the Pegasus that exists is certainly more perfect the same Pegasus if it did not exist. Existence is essential to God’s “perfectness”, as an example can be seen the “Fifth Meditation”. In this meditation, Descartes again claims that the idea of a perfect being includes existence. This cements Descartes’ theory that existence is a characteristic of perfection. Therefore, if God is to be infinitely perfect, he must exist, because if he did not, than he would indeed not be infinitely perfect. Now that we know that God is indeed perfect, and has indeed created us and our faculties, we can attribute absolute certainty that these faculties provided to us, which “would [n]ever enable [us] to go wrong while using [them] correctly” are also perfect…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes begins by applying this causality to stones and heat, things we perceive in the world, then to ideas. Since I have reason to doubt the certainty of the premise in the natural world, it seems illogical to apply the same principle to ideas. The idea that causes must contain all of the features of an effect strikes me as troublesome. Looking at the theories of evolutionary biology, which I accept to be true, one can find many examples of “more perfect” beings arising from “less perfect” causes. Beginning with life in the form of microbes and bacteria, chance mutations combined with environmental effects to produce more complex organisms over time, eventually developing consciousness and the characteristics we recognize as human. In this respect, more complex, “perfect” organisms arose from the evolution of “less perfect” life forms. This counterexample, combined with Descartes’ failure to fully and explicitly support this premise, are sufficient to make me doubt the idea that the formal reality of a cause of an idea has to be at least, if not more than, as much as the objective reality of the…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states his thesis by explaining that the act of thinking corporeal things are subject to my will and certain of the contents of our thoughts of them. He also states “they are not my invention, but that their own true and immutable natures.” (Descartes 44) He explains that certain mathematical axioms cannot be invented, for example, the properties of a triangle are not invented, because if it was my inventions I could add or subtract variables at will. Therefore I could change that the sum of the angles of a triangle to be equal to 270 degrees rather than 180 degrees. Once mathematical methods contain certain properties that, for instance, a triangle is 180 degrees, I then clearly unstained that it is clearly not in my power to alter this axiom. Additionally, I could not have put the sum of the angles to equal 180 degrees. Therefore, whether I want this axiom or if I ever thought of it previously or imaged it, they necessarily exist. According to Descartes, this proves beyond any possibility of doubt that the sum of the angles of 180 degrees could not have been invented, but instead it pertains to the nature of a triangle that was not invented by me or in my…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    causation, is the most fitting to Descartes belief about the existence of god. In my opinion, this…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle simply explains that causality in basic terms is cause and effect. Every living being and object is the effect from a cause. For example I am the effect from my parent’s conception, they are the cause for my existence. You must have a cause for your…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, these changes can be further distinguished in Descartes belief that he can develop assertions of existence from his conception of ‘I think.’ For Descartes, res cogitans is established to be a finite substance. However, he concludes that an infinite substance, God, could not have originated in himself and therefore must be the cause of this idea, which results in God necessarily existing - ‘the idea that enables me to understand a supreme deity, eternal, infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, and creator of all things other than himself.’ (Descartes, 1993, p.28) This means that for Descartes, the idea that God having far more objective reality than he has formal reality comes into realisation.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes is often credited with being the “Father of Modern Philosophy.” This title is justified due both to his break with the traditional Scholastic-Aristotelian philosophy prevalent at his time and to his development and promotion of the new, mechanistic sciences. His fundamental break with Scholastic philosophy was twofold. First, Descartes thought that the Scholastics’ method was prone to doubt given their reliance on sensation as the source for all knowledge. Second, he wanted to replace their final causal model of scientific explanation with the more modern, mechanistic model. Descartes attempted to address the former issue via his method of doubt. His basic strategy was to consider false any belief that falls prey to even the slightest doubt. This “hyperbolic doubt” then serves to clear the way for what Descartes considers to be an unprejudiced search for the truth. This clearing of his previously held beliefs then puts him at an epistemological ground-zero. From here Descartes sets out to find something that lies beyond all doubt. He eventually discovers that “I exist” is impossible to doubt and is, therefore, absolutely certain. It is from this point that Descartes proceeds to demonstrate God’s existence and that God cannot be a deceiver. This, in turn, serves to fix the certainty of everything that is clearly and distinctly understood and provides the epistemological foundation Descartes set out to find.…

    • 4140 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill On Liberty

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this one brief text, Descartes turns many Aristotelian doctrines upside down and frames many of the questions that are still being debated in philosophy today. Among other things, Descartes breaks down the Aristotelian notion that all knowledge comes via the senses and that mental states must in some way resemble what they are about. In so doing, he develops an entirely new conception of mind, matter, ideas, and a great deal else besides.…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discourse on the Method is Descartes' attempt to explain his method of reasoning through even the most difficult of problems. He illustrates the development of this method through brief autobiographical sketches interspersed with philosophical arguments.…

    • 764 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human Resource Management

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    7. Cause and Effect - Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because the events occur together.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summa Theologica

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Something can’t be self evident to us because we don’t know the definition of God…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This principles reflects the idea that causes of emotions, behaviour and thought lay within the human body.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics