Preview

Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus Summary
In Derek Bok’s article “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus,” he states that while some free speech is degrading or offensive, it is still our First Amendment right to say what we want (31-33). Bok brings up the example of two student from Harvard University who hung up a confederate flag. Some people believed that this action was demeaning, since often times the confederacy is equated with slavery. Students of the campus fought to have the symbol taken down. Bok agrees that the way in which the students handled themselves was uncalled for, but at the same time stated that it was their right to display this kind of symbol. Bok believes that deciding what qualifies as free speech, and what doesn’t, is an impossible question to answer.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. (“Tinker V. Des Moines” 3) When students wore the arm bands they were asked to go home and suspended from school. This set up the case for Tinker v. Des Moines independent school district, a case that would determine the right of free speech for students. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Freedom of speech is the right to express your ideas and opinions when you’re speaking. Equality 7-2521 was a very intelligent man. He was the smartest in his class, also known as Home of Students. Home of Students is a boarding school where he lives. He was full of ideas which he wasn’t allowed to express. Everybody had to be the same; nobody…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A century and a half ago, our nation faced a civil war. More than 620,000 Americans lost their lives at the hands of other Americans, which was subsequently equal to the total number of American deaths in all other wars combined (O’keefe). The reason for this senseless war, the Confederate States of the South wanted to keep African Americans enslaved. As Southerners fought and killed to defend slavery, they did so under the confederate flag, which consisted of the colors red, white, and blue. Terrorist groups like the Ku Klux Klan and many other white supremacist groups, led hanise crimes against African Americans which included: lynching, burning crosses, and mass murders, while using the Confederate Flag as a symbol of “unity”. A flag that stands for hatred and white supremacy is not only allowed but glorified. The confederate emblem should, not only be taken out of the Mississippi state flag, but the confederate flag should be banned from the United States.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He goes on to discuss the fact that the display of these flags triggered a lot of controversy on the university campus, over the freedom of speech. He recalled that some of the students expressed that school administration should not allow the symbols because they are offensive to others. He asserts that some of the students felt the flag was the representation of oppressive and deeply unpleasant time in American history. He also mentions the students who felt that the symbols represented free speech and should be allowed.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By definition, a speech code is any rule or regulation that limits, restricts, or bans speech beyond the strict legal limitations upon freedom of speech or press found in the legal definitions of harassment, slander, libel, and fighting words (First Amendment). There is not one real speech code that all public college campuses follow. The first amendment includes freedom of speech, but does not limit any speech codes on college campuses. The first amendment states that students have the freedom of speech unless there is "substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others". (First Amendment). The speech that is protected under the first amendment is very vague especially considering schools and campuses. Finding a set standard for what the speech codes for college campuses should be easier than it is now; there should be a set definition that lays out rules for speech on campuses.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do people burn the flag? The issue of freedom of speech is people are abusing the freedom of speech. This issue is important because some people are burning the american flag. Also after school officials banned civil rights groups from recruiting on campus. Students at the University of California organized sit ins, rallies, and strikes. People who were involved were students from Berkeley named, Mario Savio, and Bettina Apthecker. The common good of people should respect it because they US gave us that privilege of speech. We owe our government the respect because they are the ones who gave us the right.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel if you were told to take down something, or ban something with so much history, education, and expression? This might make you feel angry, uncomfortable, and sad. Banning the confederate symbol is just wrong. Why would they want to take away something with so much meaning?…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The young lady at Harvard had hung up the the flag to celebrate George Washington’s birthday and understandably enough the colored students at Harvard were offended. So as a retort directed towards the young lady another student put out a Nazi flag(Mansfield). Mansfield said that “You take offense by giving offense.” This is an example of how freedom of expression may just be racism and why politically correctness matters to an extent. Free speech is important in order to solve any problems at all but because people are taking politically correctness to such an extreme it is as if somebody were “there’s a black man standing.” They would be deemed as a racist when in all reality all they did was state a…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the dispute of flag burning has come before the Supreme Court several times in the past several decades, “on June 11, 1990, the Supreme Court once again ruled that burning the flag was an example of constitutionally protected free speech” as…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who knows the First Amendment by heart? Word for word? [Rhetorical Question] I did not and I still do not. I just know that the First Amendment gives us the right to express ourselves, at the right time and place. School should be a safe place where students, like us, can come and feel free to learn and share our opinions without any disruptions or negative comments. If such things are executed in class, it should and will call for suspension. But I am not saying that our rights are taken away when we enter school property, that is far from what I am saying. This important constitutional right that is used in our everyday lives is not absolute. The Supreme Court has gone back and forth, and back and forth [Repetition], trying to come to an agreement about what is a “reasonable” act of expression in school and how far is too far. Now, some may argue that developing such policies of limiting an individual’s ability to express themselves freely is a violation of the First Amendment [Concession][Ethos]. But when a conflict arises about which is more important, protecting the interest of the community or safeguarding the rights of that…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bok does not agree with the act of hanging the Confederate flag in public view or putting up a swastika in response. However, he does agree with the law in which every person of the United States has the right and freedom to express themselves in any way that does not cause harm, due to the First Amendment. “It is important to distinguish between the appropriateness of such communications and their status under the First Amendment” (Barnet and Bedau 66). There is no telling how another student will react to such an act of seeing a swastika…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays