Denver City Case Summary

The book is organized through an introduction, four case studies, the creation of innovation districts, global trading networks or economic development, relationships among the federal government, states, and metropolitan areas, and five points guide to how policymakers, governors, or administrators can start off their own process.
A- Case Studies
4 case studies are utilized by authors to demonstrate their opinion better on American metropolitan revolution.
First of all, the authors use New York City as an example for the importance of innovation and of cooperative governance structures. Innovation is related to technology and science according to authors. Universities are playing big part explaining cluster economy. As a result, Cornell campus
Four votes illustrate good relationship between urban city and suburbs over 45 years. Because the issues have been complicated for one metropolitan area, Denver city case is really good example of cooperation between center city and suburb cities to solve or mitigate their problems during this period. Creation of a new airport, fuels collaboration, declaring new regional sales tax, building a new rail transit system are such examples illustrating affirmative relationship in the city. Consequently, as far as I am concerned, Denver case is definitely a model for how metropolitan areas can and ought to work
Although the economy is global in 21st century, the locals or metropolitans have to wait for federal decision to trade with other countries and cities. Therefore, metropolitan areas need to be focus and organized to achieve their economic goals in global economy. The question is for metropolitan areas of US is why they have to wait for federal or state government, that is why there ought to be collaborative federalism in US for the metropolitan